I'm running with my Paladin in almost full str accesoirs (one ring is vit) and there was not yet any content in which i thought of it as inappropriate (that said I'm talking about after reaching lvl 60 and having full ilvl170/180 armor).


The only time i was using my full vit (again besides one ring) was in Alexander and that was only because all of us were new and when asking if the healers would prefer vit acc instead of str acc they said yes (we failed the fight, the bosses were still at over 10% when they self destructed and str acc would not have changed the outcome this much but sometimes it helps^^)

That said i would assume after reaching ilvl170 and higher i think there is no real reason to go vit as Long as you are not synched and your healer is good equiped (still Keep the vit acc just in case^^)

For These who say "we are tanks, we Need def,...." I would actually love that if there was an uefull stat for that, parry is utter garbage (and i really tried to see sometthing good in that stat) especially for Paladins and vit is just not that usefull after some time (sure not useless and if I would have to choose vit or parry it would always be vit, but... for known content it is just not really needed to the degree in which it is aqcuirable)
It's a shame they nerfed str as that at least gave some increased block and parry rates which made str actually quite defensive but sadly they took that away and gave nothing of equivalent value...