why only blips and beeps, I'm offended that there wouldn't be and boops. And also what have you got against a square of polkadots, or a tetrahedron of stripes?
female characters can't equip the male outfit for the eternal bonding ceremony
why only blips and beeps, I'm offended that there wouldn't be and boops. And also what have you got against a square of polkadots, or a tetrahedron of stripes?
female characters can't equip the male outfit for the eternal bonding ceremony
Last edited by Gralna; 04-23-2015 at 01:30 AM.
I don't mind it, and it's one of the only armors that actually look different on male and female.
Male Front:
Female Front:
Male Back:
Female Back:
Note the distinct and utter lack of an undershirt for females. It is NOT the same. The difference in amount of skin shown is actually greater than with the DRG outfit.
I didn't have a female Lalafell available for modeling purposes right now, but they lack the undershirt as well.
Uh... If you find the difference between the BRD outfits not "noticeable", you may want to have your eyes examined. How providing picture proof is "trying to stretch it" eludes me. I really don't think shouting "IT'S THE SAME!" is more valid.
Last edited by Felis; 04-23-2015 at 02:15 AM.
Well, Lily, when you see the animations for some DRG skills, DRG are... pretty impressive in terms of flexibility x)
But yeah, indeed, female WHM don't get underpants, female BRD are slightly more exposed, and so. My point is, even though that's the case, do we really need to make such a fuss about it ? Some are justified, some are not, and that's it, it's not as vulgar as in other MMO (*cough* TERA *cough*), and it's no big deal... And it would be awful if my WHM had underpants like males have =(
Even if that's the case, Gralna, I want my male Roe to wear a wedding dress once in a while, why not ? ;-;
Certainly there is. But we're talking about DRG armor specifically in this thread. There's no arguing that glamour allows for a rainbow of options - but none of those options allows for Dragoon armor on a male character with stomach exposed. Or, for that matter, Dragoon armor on a female with stomach covered.
Honestly, it's a discussion that has no end. SE is extremely unlikely to do anything about the original armors at this point, and so folks are going to be bickering about it until the end of time.
With any luck, though, in the future they'll avoid the silliness. Armor can be cut differently across genders - females DO have a different body shape than males, there's no denying that - but if it's going to be fanservicey on one gender, it should likewise be on the other.
I honestly can't believe people are still arguing about this. Why do you want everything to look the same? I find the tank classes to be unbelievably dull for this very reason. I hate my character having such a "masculine" look to her when in the Poetic tank gear. It's dull. It's boring. It's unexciting. I will never understand some people's need to try and "fix" things for everyone else. If you don't like the DRG look to the AF armor, don't use it, there's plenty of other options that don't have that small feature on it. And yes, it is a small feature.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.