Either do I, to be honest, but that's not the the point of this particular argument. WHY someone wants to do something is their own business.
WHAT they can or can't do is the issue.
Is it only me who noticed they took the question wrong? as many people have asked around to lift the glamour restriction on SHARED gear with different jobs, aka mages, healers and tanks (and ninja+monk now) wearing AF glamours, nothing to do with the answer they gave related to be able to wear a tank's gear as a healer. Or at least that's how I interpreted the question.
"Ninja is a DoT based class that will require more managing of the battle" - Actual truth : Ninja is just a Faster GCD Dragoon with magic instead of jumps.
"Housing will be separate from FC housing" - Actual Truth : Private and FC housing are shared in every way.
" We don't want to break immersion with outrageous glamours" Actual truth : You can be a Reindeer, Santa Claus, wear a tux/dress, wear practically nothing, look like a mage as any class and still go into battle.
"warrior is just as viable as paladin 2.0" -actual truth : Everyone went double paladin because SE is crazy.
Are you really surprised? There's more but I don't feel like going over it all. To be honest it doesn't seem like they're trying to lie or be dishonest though. It just seems like they don't really know 100% what's even inside the game or how it works sometimes.
It isn't, as they seemingly based glamours entirely on class restrictions rather than armor class (FFXIV does not have armor classes the way LOTRO and WoW do). And this was more because when originally discussed we had a bunch of people already complaining about how they didnt want black mages in full plate armor and how tanks in bikinis would look ridiculous.
Chances are they'd have to create a completely separate ruleset for glamours separate from class restrictions or make everything available for everyone. Of course, they could go the SWTOR route and implement "all classes" sets that are plate and dyeable acolyte gear and so on in the cash shop. I don't think they'd be dumb enough to do that, but...
* The sad thing is that FFXIV turned RDM into a turret, and people think that's what it's supposed to be. It's supposed to combine sword and magic into something more, not spend the bulk of gameplay spamming spells and jump into melee for only 3 GCDs before scurrying back to the back line like good little casters.
* Design ideas:
Red Mage - COMPLETE (https://tinyurl.com/y6tsbnjh), Chemist - Second Pass (https://tinyurl.com/ssuog88), Thief - First Pass (https://tinyurl.com/vdjpkoa), Rune Fencer - First Pass (https://tinyurl.com/y3fomdp2)
That is a very good point that I did not consider! I'm not a MNK or a NIN, so I was not originally aware of this contradiction.Is it only me who noticed they took the question wrong? as many people have asked around to lift the glamour restriction on SHARED gear with different jobs, aka mages, healers and tanks (and ninja+monk now) wearing AF glamours, nothing to do with the answer they gave related to be able to wear a tank's gear as a healer. Or at least that's how I interpreted the question.
All I really care about is them making it so I can glamour my Odin Armor onto other gear instead of being forced to wear JUST the Odin Armor when I want to look all Dark Knightish.
~ Eternal Dawn FC ~ Male Player ~
I always figured it was convoluted and retarded.It isn't, as they seemingly based glamours entirely on class restrictions rather than armor class (FFXIV does not have armor classes the way LOTRO and WoW do). And this was more because when originally discussed we had a bunch of people already complaining about how they didnt want black mages in full plate armor and how tanks in bikinis would look ridiculous.
![]()
I'd actually prefer it if the tightened up those items that can be used to look unlike your role. I also really dislike swimsuit tanks and Snowman heads.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.