Oh look old thread locked. New trhead made 5 min later. I'm not having this useless discussion again. Let's make this simple, I'm right and you're wrong because reasons. This topic in a nutshell.

Oh look old thread locked. New trhead made 5 min later. I'm not having this useless discussion again. Let's make this simple, I'm right and you're wrong because reasons. This topic in a nutshell.


You guys need to learn to pick your battles. I support gay marriage in real life and even I'm getting sick of this.
Marriages will add absolutely nothing to this game, it is 100% a waste of the developers' time. They should scrap the whole thing just so there's nothing to complain about.
![]()

What ever happened to using one's imagination? Wedding clothing is coming (from what I hear). What is so wrong with having two people dress up in appropriate attire, have a friend craft some rings, another friend act as the preacher?
Or do people honestly want a whole NPC dialog quest to get "married" in game?
Error 3102 Survivor
SE should keyword "marriage" so when people make threads constantly about it they're rejected before they even show up. If players can't agree, don't add it at all. These threads are just getting ridiculous
Last edited by YmirEsc; 05-28-2014 at 02:42 AM. Reason: typo


Need more Adventure !
/joke
I don't get why Yay'ers and Nay'ers care so much about this.
It's a game, not real, virtual, so why arguing about whenever or not same gender mariage is alowed or not?
It's vecause of people like you (talking to them drama queens/kings ) that SE didn't add wedding any sooner.
If I were SE I would say this;
"What? You're all crying because some whant same sex mariage and others don't? No wedding for you all then."
I'm firmly in the camp that the issue should not be addressed at all. What I mean is - shelve the whole marriage thing for about 5 years and then revisit it. The game has vastly improved, but we're still nowhere near the level of polish where they devs can sit back and fluff it up yet and this is just too big and personal a deal for too many people. We don't need ANY kind of marriage in game, and yes I realize that a handful of people who were really looking forward to it and already happen to have the appropriate sexes on their characters to participate might be disappointed, but it IS a super controversial hot topic right now and if SE knew what was good for them (and the game), they'd put it on the back burner and worry about actual game stuff.
Let us fight new dragons, not each other over what pixel gets to marry another pixel.
Having said all that, I think that the title of this thread shouldn't be "Prove it's controversial". It is. What it SHOULD say is "Prove that including it will make the game and company implode." We all know the answer is no (Lionshead, Bioware, Bethesda all have these options and have for years and years), but in the interest of the vocal minority just don't kick this hornet's nest. Just don't do it. We don't need this particular fluff content THAT badly that it's worth the shitstorm of negative press SE will surely get if they build in discrimination.

@PandaPause
I can't help but laugh each time I see your signature. I hated that damn dog in duck hunt but it is so apt to that Predator scene.
Error 3102 Survivor
Plus, results would be skewed. IMMA MAKE 8 ALTS TO VOTE! HURR
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.








