Free Company Capacity - Insufficient Resources to Complete this Action

[Astorra]

No honest man needs an FC capacity over ten

[UguuTwerk]

No honest man needs an FC capacity over ten

Honest catboys do

[TheRac25]

I find the lack of English comprehension in this thread appalling, in addition I support the motion to flip a bit (or two) in the FC size limit constant.

[Camate]

Greetings,

While we do not have any plans to increase the cap for the maximum number of free company members, in the future we will be implementing a free company alliance feature that will allow you to connect with friendly free companies. We'll keep you updated on this feature!

[Alhanelem]

I find it hard to believe there are any free companies large enough to be anywhere near the current size limit.

[Brevitic]

I find it hard to believe there are any free companies large enough to be anywhere near the current size limit.

It's you. You're it. MY EVERYTHING.

[Sinth]

Why don't we just put everyone in a server in one FC? Boom problem solved.

[DNA]

I find it hard to believe there are any free companies large enough to be anywhere near the current size limit.

And now the thread has come full circle.

[Gleditsia]

I find it hard to believe there are any free companies large enough to be anywhere near the current size limit.

I find it hard to believe people still comment without knowing what they're talking about or reading the thread at all.

[Rowyne]

The problem with that idea is that Linkshells have a fourth of the capacity as Free Companies do. As much as we would like to try, there's no way you're going to arrange 600 people or so in such a way that everyone can talk to everyone else, even with 8 Linkshells.

This is something I just fail to understand. Keeping the linkshell system as a chat function was smart, IMO. However, linkshell limits should be higher than free company limits so that you can use them to communicate across groups. The 128 person limit just makes no sense.