Quote Originally Posted by Biggs View Post
The lack of ls loyalty in this game really bothers me as well. There is no incentive to just stay on one shell. I really feel like this is one of the major ways SE is not supporting the current community.
While i strongly agree Linkshell leaders and officers need a lot more options to manage shells...i really do not understand the loyalty thing you're talking about.

Do you want SE to force us to be loyal to one LS? Hell not even in XI did that happen lol
In my opinion, a system like it is now, where you can be in multiple linkshells and chat between them (see chat from LS you don't have equipped...i just wish we could switch them faster lol) is great, an improvement over XI and damn, even improves and supports community/socializing in my opinion.
I've met some nice people from various linkshells and it's always nice to switch LS and chat with them.

I'm always for freedom of choice, player is either going to be loyal...or not, I do not see any reason for SE to "force" players to be loyal to single LS.

If things like endgame (one day lol) bothers you, where you don't want people who do not have pearl on to see the chat, SE could simply add option to temp. hide LS chat from players who do not have a pearl on.

If i misunderstood what you were trying to say, then i apologize
Again, I'm all for better LS management options.