Results 1 to 10 of 1719

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player Supersun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    522
    Enspells conflicting with sambas is a pretty big thing.

    I'd almost rather them just restrict future enspells to the first strike and double the intended damage than letting it activate on all hits.

    Sure you might lose a bit if you double attack or are dual wielding a joyeuse, but that's nothing compared to the +50% damage bonus you can lose by excluding yourself from haste samba.

    Besides, it's not like single wielding couldn't use the buff anyway.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Windurst
    Posts
    2,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Supersun View Post
    Enspells conflicting with sambas is a pretty big thing.

    I'd almost rather them just restrict future enspells to the first strike and double the intended damage than letting it activate on all hits.

    Sure you might lose a bit if you double attack or are dual wielding a joyeuse, but that's nothing compared to the +50% damage bonus you can lose by excluding yourself from haste samba.

    Besides, it's not like single wielding couldn't use the buff anyway.
    That's why I advocated for JA haste (if they were going to give a serious melee buff but idrc all that much), so even if you don't get Haste samba it's not as big a deal. Doing more damage doesn't really hurt either as long as it isn't 'overpowering', which SE seems to have a problem with.
    (0)