Can't say I was expecting much from your response Greatguardian. As all I ever see is you basically calling any form of idea that anyone else has "rubbish" (I have literally yet to see otherwise) without any backing or any form of alternative solutions (which is called constructive criticism). "May as well rewrite the game from scatch" isn't much of a counter-argument. Since you're not denying the fact that the system is broken and seem hell-bent on derailing any train of thought on fixing it, I see no reason to continue this irrelevant debate where all you do is try to insult other people, in a passive-aggressive manner.
For some one claiming that some one else is not understanding what you're saying, you sure do not read much of what other people say. Evading the "equality" statements still while repeatedly saying "it's broken but, don't fix it".
I am still waiting on an actual response to what I said regarding this. This doesn't count as one as it completely misses the point (that people complaining is irrelevant to fixing something, that you yourself admit, is broken, whether it's a nerf or not and regardless of which imaginary side of the fence the people complaining are on or how many people are complaining).
Note: I used the word imaginary because you're basicaly making up a conflict between 2 groups that don't exist (unless you consider yourself to be the other group by yourself). Imaginary Group A wants to be equal to Imaginary Group B, not superior.

Reply With Quote