
Originally Posted by
Greatguardian
Blue procs: Worthless because having Sword Blues isn't going to do you any good if you end up with Scythe, or Katana, or any of the myriad other non-PLD Weapon classes in Slashing Blue time. If you are after Blue procs, you should be bringing a MNK and a WHM, period. The second best, but still absolutely horrible option is to bring a THF, DRG, and RNG together for the Piercing time procs. Slashing is absolutely terrible and no one in their right mind should be attempting Blue procs during Slashing hours.
Grellow Procs: Flash. Holy. Banish 2. Banish 3. Unfortunately, if you're doing Grellow within Light-potential hours, you need Banishga 2 to complete your set. In order to get Banishga 2, you need a WHM. If you have a WHM, PLD is redundant at best and useless at worst.
Red Procs: Here is where a lot of people give Paladin way, way more credit than it deserves. Yes, Paladin has a large number of Red procs. Unfortunately, it doesn't have enough of the right ones to make it at all useful in this regard. Every Red proc PLD has, WAR also has. In order for PLD to not be redundant, you have to assume that there is not a WAR in the group.
If there is not a WAR in the group, your best option for additional Red procs becomes Ninja. Unfortunately, a lot of Paladin procs also overlap with Ninja. The only Weaponskills that Paladin has that Ninja does not are Sunburst and Freezebite. Unfortunately, this only brings you up to 12/13 reds. Neither Paladin nor Ninja has Shadow of Death. Since you are assuming that there is not a WAR in the group, this means that the only job which has native access to your last Red proc is Dark Knight. Your only other options are a BST or BLM subbing Warrior or Dark Knight, which is beyond ridiculous.
In a nutshell, in order for Paladin to not be completely redundant for Red procs, your group must not have a Warrior, and must also have a Dark Knight. If you can't figure out what's wrong with that situation, then I just can't say anything else.
If you somehow "Countered" this argument in a previous thread, I did not see it and I'd be more than welcome to hear it again.