More gender locked gear.

Expeditioner's Gloves. Why are these gender locked? There is no male equivelent, so males basically miss completing the set. How are these even feminine?

There's nothing wrong with gender locked gear.
However, hot having equivalents are pretty lame. Primal data centre is down right now, else I'd double check if there was or wasn't, but I'll take your word for it.

The gloves are a bit weird.
If I just keep thinking it was an accident I'll feel better.

It must take longer for them to adapt gloves to our gigantic manly hands these days, we mustn't be so hard on them.

I don't have any real words for how pointless and silly this oversight was unless they're actively trying to antagonise us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

It must take longer for them to adapt gloves to our gigantic manly hands these days, we mustn't be so hard on them.

I don't have any real words for how pointless and silly this oversight was unless they're actively trying to antagonise us.

---

I'd honestly laugh if that were the case. Or if any future gender lock equips are of such minor differences that it's clear somethings going on lol. Nothing but gender locked belts that don't even show up. Would love it if that happened lol. The reason? Ignoring any potential spite on the devs behalf, it'd separate the crowds with the logical and the frothing at the mouth SJW types. People throwing a fit that pointless belts are gender locked, using the rising number of them as some sort of pointless evidence of a pointless argument. Ignoring the fact that that would mean that gender locked gear isn't a thing. The down side? That'd mean one or two things: 1) There's no more obviously distinguishable feminine and masculine glamour. 2) We'll never truly know what was going to be gender specific and what wasn't.

The ponytail hair for males makes you like princess :rolleyes:

Trust me, there was much salt over this today, although I think most of my FC just thought I was being weird again.

But seriously, gloves? GLOVES? When they not only said they'd take more care to keep glamour options balanced in the future, but specifically pointed out head and hand equipment as easier to make unisex? This feels like a slap in the face.

I mean, it's certainly not because the items are too feminine, considering one of the unisex items this patch is the Ureaus Skirt, which looks like a miniskirt on both males and females. So what gives, SE? are you messing with us? Was Zhexos just trying to get us to drop the subject peacefully, at least until the next patch? Was he relaying the truth about the team's intentions at the time, but the designers get easily distracted by the shiny of female-only gear and just can't help themselves (and somehow lack any supervision whatsoever)?

Are we ever going to see a sincere attempt to balance things out? ONE update with no female-only gear and a few male-only pieces (Which wouldn't even have to be new or original, just a remodel of an existing set!) would go a long way. Heck, just unlocking the bunny ears would make me feel listened to (Though I'd still like the whole set to be unlocked for RHPS cosplay justice).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Welsper59

hur dur ESS JAY DUBYAS

---

did you seriously just create an anti sj wet dream dialogue situation where none existed just so u could insert how much u hate queers and women?

like this thread is literally just "so why are there pointless restrictions on this glamour gear?" and here u are with ur barely coherent train of thought all

"yeah i hate minorities too FUCK WITH EM DEVS HOO BOY"

I agree with Canadane here. There is nothing wrong with gender locked gear and when i checked out the Lodestone Database. It appeared that they forgot to include Expeditioner's Gloves for males, or that they might have made a mistake making the gloves gender specific.

If that was the case, then i’d be sure they would fix it through a patch or a hotfix. But, then i remembered that i saw the Expeditioner's Set within one of the recent trailers.

http://i.imgur.com/QRYBybs.png

As you can see here, the Expeditioner's Set for male characters doesn’t appear to have gloves in the first place. So, by looking at it from that aspect, it’s not like they forgot the gloves for the set, but rather the set didn’t include gloves for males.

You could say that the set that’s currently available is not a mistake, but “by design”.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Canadane

There's nothing wrong with gender locked gear.

---

Hum...
Why should girl be allowed to wear Slutty bikini or other silky stuff and my manly aora don't ?

Like the thavnarian outfit...
I want the robe too ! XD

Unfair !
My aora can be fabulous too !
I want him to be !

the gender locks are kind of dissatisfying honestly
in a perfect world square would stop releasing genderlocked gear and just let us dress our men in well, dresses

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aldora

As you can see here, the Expeditioner's Set for male characters doesn’t appear to have gloves in the first place. So, by looking at it from that aspect, it’s not like they forgot the gloves for the set, but rather the set didn’t include gloves for males.

You could say that the set that’s currently available is not a mistake, but “by design”.

---

Shouldn't we get to decide that? The 'no glove' effect is accessible by players with female characters too, yet we only have one option and two fewer glamour items to add to the huge backlog of female-biased glamour options already in the game. I maintain that there should be a warning on character creation that male characters will be much more limited with glamour later in the game so that new players aren't under the false impression that the design team are going to be treating them fairly.

I don't care if they're going to allow men to wear feminine gears but please release more feminine gears like skirts. Most of the endgame leg parts nowadays are long trousers because when they make a skirt, male players complain that they have to wear skirts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Evangela

I don't care if they're going...

---

I agree but I think men only complain if their for example "lore gear" or high end gear gives them feminie clothes. Male players weren't happy with ESO SMN and WhM gear. And now upset at tank gear.

And when girls get like 5 new glamour items restricted to us. And they only get 1. They feel like they're being mistreated and I think just letting them wear our stuff isn't satisfying enough. Because even if girly glamour was made so everyone can wear it. Plenty of people who play man characters will STILL see it as gender catering because they specifically want to look masculine.

So now it seems like SE is gonna make random items gender locked just to meet the quota of "we made it equal" you got 3 items they got 3 items

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

Shouldn't we get to decide that?

---

Aren’t we already? I mean, we get to decide how we want to dress ourselves by using the Glamour system. So, if you want to wear gloves with that set, why wouldn’t you simply wear the ones you’d like with that set?

That doesn’t change the fact that in this case, the design of the male version of the Expeditioner's Set did not include any gloves. However, you are free to wear gloves if you want to. It’s not that the game doesn’t have a small assortment of gloves to choose from.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

The 'no glove' effect is accessible by players with female characters too, yet we only have one option and two fewer glamour items to add to the huge backlog of female-biased glamour options already in the game.

---

I’m sorry, that’s an opinion i don’t share.

I’ve read a few of your posts where you point out that female characters have more options to choose from and i don’t deny that. What i don’t share is the opinion that there is a “huge backlog of female-biased glamour options”. I know you will not agree with me on this, which is fine, but when looking at the amount of clothing options the game has, the amount of “female-biased glamour options” aren’t as huge as you make them to be.

But, like i said. That’s my opinion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

I maintain that there should be a warning on character creation that male characters will be much more limited with glamour later in the game so that new players aren't under the false impression that the design team are going to be treating them fairly.

---

Why should there be a warning on the character creation that male characters will be limited on the glamour items? I’m fairly sure that most of the male characters in the game don’t really care much about gender specific clothing. They go through the list of items they can wear and pick what they think fits their character most.

There will always be gender specific gear. What Zhexos said back then, was that they team would introduce more male specific gear to the game. Here you have a Expeditioner's Set, which has a version which is exclusive for each gender.

However, it’s still up to the FFXIV team how they will design each individual set. It’s up to the players how they would be using the set, by mixing and matching their outfit based on the available glamours.

The item you want to glamour isn’t available? There’s no harm in requesting it. But, requesting that they need to add a warning to the character creation that either gender is “limited in their options” is (pardon my english) a bit sad.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Critical-Limit

Summoner Artifact Set

---

i acknowledge that im probably in the one percent here, but i just wanted to chime in that i absolutely LOVE the summoner set. before 3.2 when esos where still esos and not the new lawstones, i craved the set but couldnt justify getting it because i almost never played summoner(scholar got more use)

it has everything i personally love. its baroque, its sleek, its colorful, its flowy,its androgynous, IT HAS WINGS

needless to say im very happy now that we're hemorrhaging eso

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Evangela

I don't care if they're going to allow men to wear feminine gears but please release more feminine gears like skirts. Most of the endgame leg parts nowadays are long trousers because when they make a skirt, male players complain that they have to wear skirts.

---

Agreed also need more feminine shoes

I am of the personal opinion that they should simply make male/female versions of everything, i mean they could have done that with the guardian corps outfit Lightning wears, there is a male version of it in her game, and why can my miqo'te not wear snows trench coat and bandanna?

So glad the new hairstyles were not gender exclusive (the spikey one especially, I've been begging forever for a true spikey female hairstyle that wasn't Lightnings, thank you SE)

In some cases maybe it makes sense, seeing guys run around in speedos is kind of much.. but oddly placed gender locks i don't understand.. like why can't males and females both wear the oasis MGP outfit? o.o

I just realized male lore tank gear is corsets! :eek:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aldora

Aren’t we already? I mean, we get to decide how we want to dress ourselves by using the Glamour system. So, if you want to wear gloves with that set, why wouldn’t you simply wear the ones you’d like with that set?

---

And if the ones I want are the matching ones that were designed for use with that set, and there's no fundamental difference between a man's hands and a woman's, why are we being locked out for no reason? There's no male-only equivalent to these gloves. I will freely admit that gloves aren't the be-all and end-all of my fashion choices, but almost every major patch since 2.2 has added gender-locked items in a ratio which favours players with female characters. The vast majority of these items aren't especially feminine in the slightest, and the community team has repeatedly acknowledged the imbalance and passed our wishes on to the design team. Yet it keeps happening - and in a way which is so ridiculous I'd take it for parody if I didn't know better.

Quote:

---

I’ve read a few of your posts where you point out that female characters have more options to choose from and i don’t deny that. What i don’t share is the opinion that there is a “huge backlog of female-biased glamour options”. I know you will not agree with me on this, which is fine, but when looking at the amount of clothing options the game has, the amount of “female-biased glamour options” aren’t as huge as you make them to be.

---

You're entitled to your opinion but I respectfully strongly disagree. We're up to 23 items more for players with female characters, which isn't a huge amount if you consider every item in the game but it's a large amount when you consider we pay the same subscription fees and that all of these items are specifically for glamour, not just arbitrary low level dungeon sets. When the gap keeps growing in one direction with each new batch of glamour items, it doesn't take a great deal of paranoia to read the writing on the wall. Especially when it's just a pair of gloves (two, actually) and female characters effectively have access to both the 'female version' and the 'male version' of the sets. If this was about integrity of design, the female players would have no gloves either and their version of the top would automatically cover the hands.

Quote:

---

Why should there be a warning on the character creation that male characters will be limited on the glamour items? I’m fairly sure that most of the male characters in the game don’t really care much about gender specific clothing. They go through the list of items they can wear and pick what they think fits their character most.

---

Because they charge money to change gender (and in cases like mine, a name change would also be needed if I did; I'm not going to). The preferential treatment for female characters began in 2.2, and they keep sending messages implying that it will be addressed - yet it isn't, and in fact they just keep making it worse. If this is an actual policy then it's only fair to communicate it; nobody knows that aesthetic choices made in character creation actually limit your access to the same treatment later on. To you it's not important that we don't get to be excited about as many new glamour sets per patch. Others have a different outlook.

Quote:

---

There will always be gender specific gear. What Zhexos said back then, was that they team would introduce more male specific gear to the game. Here you have a Expeditioner's Set, which has a version which is exclusive for each gender.

---

Sorry, are we supposed to be happy about being treated not quite as badly as we could have been?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jeibird

i acknowledge that im probably in the one percent here, but i just wanted to chime in that i absolutely LOVE the summoner set. before 3.2 when esos where still esos and not the new lawstones, i craved the set but couldnt justify getting it because i almost never played summoner(scholar got more use)

it has everything i personally love. its baroque, its sleek, its colorful, its flowy,its androgynous, IT HAS WINGS

needless to say im very happy now that we're hemorrhaging eso

---

Completely agree, I'm buying that set this week now the esoterics are rolling in. It's stunning.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eul

I just realized male lore tank gear is corsets! :eek:

---

Thats why it is awesome!

Now this is interesting I once had a discussion in another game with this well-meaning idiot about how gender locked gear is basically discriminatory against transgendered players.

WMI: "Transgendered players should be allowed to create male characters and make them wear dresses.

ME: "Why?"

WMI: "BECAUSE, they're transgendered!"

ME: "No, that's stupid."

WMI: (After calling me hurtful names. I am NOT a Neocon.) "Why do you say that?"

ME: (Logic bomb) A trans woman would just roll a female character. Do you not know how this stuff works?"

There was probably 200% more cursing involved in the conversation, but jeeeeez. People want to be supportive but they have this twisted idea of what being supportive actually means.

While I agree that the freedom to choose one's gender in the game makes some concerns less critical, I think the view on 'men in skirts' is a lot more complex than that. What if you want to be a guy who wears fabulous robes, or a a female character who is a tomboy with short hair and actual trousers (my male friend who plays a female Miqo'te and wants to see her dressing conservatively could write essays on this topic)? You can appreciate that kind of aesthetic regardless of your real-life or in-game gender expression. The design team has been pretty supportive in general of these options, with tons of skirts available to male characters. So strictly conforming to western gender norms and modern society don't seem to be high up on their list of concerns.

In any case, this topic is about gloves so let's not confuse it with cross-dressing.

I haven't played on my male characters/designs yet to try on the new gear and see if their is any differences...the PVP ones seem gender neutral which I love, the hair cuts were a great job and a step in the right direction (I also don't have the new poses to comment on those yet...)

I think the ramie set for girls is beautiful. I always advocate and support threads like these, so don't let this statement mar my usual support ...

"It's only gloves!"

Isn't it a kinda great thing that this time ..it's only gloves? That we all got equal amounts of items? That's definitely a plus!

But...

In the same breath the fact that it's only gloves...- why are the gloves even gendered? XD

http://4funz.com/Funny-Pictures/rand...read-again-167

I hope we get even more gender locked gear, just to annoy people

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vivi_Bushido

*sarcastic picture*

---

Imagine how great it will be when they finally address the problem and we don't have to keep defending ourselves against the same recycled 'men just want to wear dresses', 'glamour is stupid', 'make a female character, then' and 'it doesn't affect me so it's not a problem at all' arguments! The forums will be so peaceful.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BrokenFox

I hope we get even more gender locked gear, just to annoy people

---

At least hope for some male-locked gear so it can annoy a different half of the fanbase for once, I'm sure everyone is sick to death of me by now :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

The forums will be so peaceful.

---

No they won't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

While I agree that the freedom to choose one's gender in the game makes some concerns less critical, I think the view on 'men in skirts' is a lot more complex than that.

---

Don't know If you were generally addressing my point but.

I agree it's more complex.

When I talk about letting men wear female clothes I'm not addressing the people who want it. I'm fine with men wearing dresses. And I think most are fine with guys being able to choose female clothes. Or vice versa. The problem people might ignore until a thread is made again by a upset customer is.

Just because square puts out 5 new sets of glamour and both sexes can wear doesn't make it 100% equal and fair. If they release 5 dresses in one patch. Even IF men can wear it. Guys who want the "macho" man gear will feel neglected.

Just trying to put myself in their shoes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

Imagine how great it will be when they finally address the problem and we don't have to keep defending ourselves against the same recycled 'men just want to wear dresses', 'glamour is stupid', 'make a female character, then' and 'it doesn't affect me so it's not a problem at all' arguments! The forums will be so peaceful.



At least hope for some male-locked gear so it can annoy a different half of the fanbase for once, I'm sure everyone is sick to death of me by now :P

---

Personally, I could care less if there's gender locked gear or not. I think the game has far more pressing concerns to worry about then wither or not you can wear a pair of gloves; but then again, I've never been a believer of "Glamour is true endgame" anyway, ya know, considering this game use to not have any glamour at all; so honestly, I'm happy with having what we have now instead of being ungrateful.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Critical-Limit

When I talk about letting men wear female clothes I'm not addressing the people who want it. I'm fine with men wearing dresses. And I think most are fine with guys being able to choose female clothes. Or vice versa. The problem people might ignore until a thread is made again by a upset customer is.

Just because square puts out 5 new sets of glamour and both sexes can wear doesn't make it 100% equal and fair. If they release 5 dresses in one patch. Even IF men can wear it. Guys who want the "macho" man gear will feel neglected.

---

I was mostly talking about the post above that one but you raise a fair point which often comes up too. I think though, that both male and female characters will benefit in the long term if there is a wide selection of options available to everyone. Thinking of my friends with female characters, one likes to dress smartly in trousers while another prefers to (frankly) dress like a stripper most of the time, however she gets upset when she's tanking and not wearing some super-manly armour set as it ruins her mood. If the design team can keep creating sets which suit both tastes and keep gender-unlocked options available to everyone, everyone gets to pick the exact look to suit their character's personality.

If there's a bias towards elegant robes which look awkward on males with larger frames, this should be addressed as a separate problem; the AST esoteric gear eventually grew on me but I'm still not convinced by the lore top and will probably glamour the PVP gear over it immediately. But everyone's idea of what constitutes manliness is different.

Thank you for thinking about the problem considerately.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aryalandi

No they won't.

---

I know, I was being a little facetious ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vivi_Bushido

honestly, I'm happy with having what we have now instead of being ungrateful.

---

Well of course you are, you are posting with a female character! Kudos for replying to me complaining about the 'it doesn't affect me so it's not a problem at all' crowd by making that exact argument in response.

In any case, I'm not going to stop posting about the imbalance until the problem goes away so it may be best to avoid threads on this particular topic if glamour isn't interesting to you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Evangela

I don't care if they're going to allow men to wear feminine gears but please release more feminine gears like skirts. Most of the endgame leg parts nowadays are long trousers because when they make a skirt, male players complain that they have to wear skirts.

---

http://xivdb.com/item/14868/Uraeus+Skirt
with no pants or socks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Felis

http://xivdb.com/item/14868/Uraeus+Skirt
with no pants or socks

---

Skirt for males also. I think it's almost "fair" >_>;

But not for bunny ears

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

And if the ones I want are the matching ones that were designed for use with that set, and there's no fundamental difference between a man's hands and a woman's, why are we being locked out for no reason?

---

But, that’s just the thing. Those gloves were designed for the female version Expeditioner's Set, which looks different from its male counterpart. They share the same name,“feel” and theme, but the design for the male and female version aren’t the same.
From my perspective, they could’ve added “Fingerless Gloves” or “Ringbands” to match the overall look of the male set, but the FFXIV team went for a set without gloves. That is still their decision.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

There's no male-only equivalent to these gloves. I will freely admit that gloves aren't the be-all and end-all of my fashion choices, but almost every major patch since 2.2 has added gender-locked items in a ratio which favours players with female characters. The vast majority of these items aren't especially feminine in the slightest, and the community team has repeatedly acknowledged the imbalance and passed our wishes on to the design team. Yet it keeps happening - and in a way which is so ridiculous I'd take it for parody if I didn't know better.

---

And the Expeditioner's Set is the first set which has a gender specific version for both genders. This is proof that they are listening to the voices of the community, but make no mistake, if they feel that a certain outfit is only meant for males/females to wear, then they are in their right to place such a restriction on it.

Up until now, that meant that certain sets were designed so that only females were allowed to wear it and should respect their decision on it. Like i said in my previous comment, there is no harm in requesting certain glamours for the opposite gender. But, if the FFXIV teams that it does not suit a male character, then so be it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

You're entitled to your opinion but I respectfully strongly disagree. We're up to 23 items more for players with female characters, which isn't a huge amount if you consider every item in the game but it's a large amount when you consider we pay the same subscription fees and that all of these items are specifically for glamour, not just arbitrary low level dungeon sets. When the gap keeps growing in one direction with each new batch of glamour items, it doesn't take a great deal of paranoia to read the writing on the wall. Especially when it's just a pair of gloves (two, actually) and female characters effectively have access to both the 'female version' and the 'male version' of the sets.

If this was about integrity of design, the female players would have no gloves either and their version of the top would automatically cover the hands.

---

Why? Because their male counterparts didn’t have any gloves added to their design? Then what about the rest of the set? The coat of the male version looks more ragged/tattered than the female version, which looks more smooth and clean tabard. The female version has thighboots which the male version has Moccasins.

There are fundamental differences between the two sets, but still share the same theme.

The design integrity doesn’t mean that the outfit of both genders need to consist out of the same amount parts. All of the parts of the design need to relate to each other as well as the whole design. If the FFXIV teams felt that the design of the male Expeditioner's Set worked better without gloves and because of that didn’t make any for the male set, who are we to say that they are wrong because the female version does in fact include gloves (or the other way around)?

Next to that, If you look at the Expeditioner's Tabard they actually do cover the hands (partially). You can make it look even more different if you wear long gloves/gauntles, like the
“Eikon Leather Armguards of Striking” which will cover more the lower part of the arm on one side, while leaving it open on the other.

The Glamour system allows you to change the look and feel of the gear you are wearing, just by trying out different combinations.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

Because they charge money to change gender (and in cases like mine, a name change would also be needed if I did; I'm not going to). The preferential treatment for female characters began in 2.2, and they keep sending messages implying that it will be addressed - yet it isn't, and in fact they just keep making it worse. If this is an actual policy then it's only fair to communicate it; nobody knows that aesthetic choices made in character creation actually limit your access to the same treatment later on. To you it's not important that we don't get to be excited about as many new glamour sets per patch. Others have a different outlook.

Sorry, are we supposed to be happy about being treated not quite as badly as we could have been?

---

Ow, come on… You are not being treated “badly”. Not by a long shot.

From what i’ve read, it’s not really the issue that men can’t wear certain gear (like the Thavnarian Dress or the Bunny ears). But, the main reason is that there is gear present in the game, where there is no equivalent for the opposite sex. It doesn’t matter how much.

Right now, according to your message above, there are 23 items which are exclusive to females, where there’s no equivalent male characters. 23. How many outfits are we talking about? 4 and a half? For every item that exists within the game that is only available for 1 specific gender, there will be someone complaining that it is unfair to them.

Let me ask you this very bluntly: What are we? Little children complaining that “she has more toys than i do”? Do we really need to split every single gummybear so that everyone has the same amount of candy?

There will always be things exclusive to others, be it items in seasonal events that you might have missed, clothing that is only available for a certain gender, items you can only obtain by working your ass off in order to get it (both through skill and sheer effort/time spent).

You are absolutely right that i don’t really care about gender exclusive items (and not because my character is apparently a female Miq’ote). And i don’t really get excited about most of the glamour items they introduce for that matter.

But, what i do care about is people believe that they are being treated unfairly because of silly things like this. And yes, complaining about a “missing” glove and believing that new players should be warned that male characters will be “limited in their choice of wardrobe” because we are paying the same subscription fee, is silly.

While it is clear that female characters do get far more gear options than men I do agree that I find it silly to go to the length of warning people at character creator about it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Aldora

But, that’s just the thing. Those gloves were designed for the female version Expeditioner's Set, which looks different from its male counterpart. They share the same name,“feel” and theme, but the design for the male and female version aren’t the same.
From my perspective, they could’ve added “Fingerless Gloves” or “Ringbands” to match the overall look of the male set, but the FFXIV team went for a set without gloves. That is still their decision.

---

Right, and it's one they keep making in a way which arbitrarily favours half of their user base. I can believe that it was their artistic decision and it just happened to be that way - once or twice. Not every time. This isn't a decision which happened in a vacuum but rather one which was made in the full knowledge that players with male characters from the US to Japan were upset that they weren't getting as many glamour items to choose from, an issue which numerous community reps have responded on several times.

Quote:

---

And the Expeditioner's Set is the first set which has a gender specific version for both genders. This is proof that they are listening to the voices of the community, but make no mistake, if they feel that a certain outfit is only meant for males/females to wear, then they are in their right to place such a restriction on it.

---

I'm not sure that's true so perhaps I've misunderstood? There are numerous sets of gear which have separate male and female versions, even though it's the unisex and female ones we complain about. I very much like the High House Justaucorps in the previous patch, for example, and while it meant I couldn't wear the Bustle you'll find no complaints on the forum about it from me. Because it was fair.

It would make considerably more sense for the sake of inventory management and fantasia addicts to have them as the same item with different appearances when equipped (like most of the older unisex gear) but I don't have a problem with gear having different appearances on different models if that's how the design team want to do things.

Quote:

---

The design integrity doesn’t mean that the outfit of both genders need to consist out of the same amount parts. All of the parts of the design need to relate to each other as well as the whole design. If the FFXIV teams felt that the design of the male Expeditioner's Set worked better without gloves and because of that didn’t make any for the male set, who are we to say that they are wrong because the female version does in fact include gloves (or the other way around)?

---

I'd still prefer to make the decision about gloves/no gloves myself, and I believe the design team generally supports this (going as far to offer the whole /visor feature to allow for individual variations on a theme). Female characters can make that call, and decide whether their version looks best with the matched gloves, another type or barehanded. Male characters don't get the first choice. Even if the gloves blatantly didn't match, it would have been a nice touch to add them in anyway as another item with a different name for males - perhaps they'd match another glamour idea someone has set their heart on?

Quote:

---

From what i’ve read, it’s not really the issue that men can’t wear certain gear (like the Thavnarian Dress or the Bunny ears). But, the main reason is that there is gear present in the game, where there is no equivalent for the opposite sex. It doesn’t matter how much.

---

The two are intrinsically linked to me. I do honestly want the bunny gear most of all, but in principle when you're coming up with ideas it's more fun to work with more options at your fingertips than it is with less. The sets which are locked happen to be some of the absolute most popular glamour items in the entire game (source: the last census) - and anecdotally I can't go anywhere in a crowd without seeing bunnies and Thavnairian pieces equipped on other players. Obviously in this case it's just gloves, but how many times do we have to feel as though players with female characters get special treatment? Those gloves might be the only piece which fit some themes (indeed, I hope they are otherwise there wasn't a great deal of point in them being made in the first place).

Quote:

---

Let me ask you this very bluntly: What are we? Little children complaining that “she has more toys than i do”? Do we really need to split every single gummybear so that everyone has the same amount of candy?

There will always be things exclusive to others, be it items in seasonal events that you might have missed, clothing that is only available for a certain gender, items you can only obtain by working your ass off in order to get it (both through skill and sheer effort/time spent).

You are absolutely right that i don’t really care about gender exclusive items (and not because my character is apparently a female Miq’ote). And i don’t really get excited about most of the glamour items they introduce for that matter.

But, what i do care about is people believe that they are being treated unfairly because of silly things like this. And yes, complaining about a “missing” glove and believing that new players should be warned that male characters will be “limited in their choice of wardrobe” because we are paying the same subscription fee, is silly.

---

Well yes, it's silly. Glamour is silly. Fantasy videogames are silly. There are far more important things to worry about in the real world no matter how you slice it. I'm standing up for something I care about in the full knowledge that it's completely ridiculous in the wider context of world we live in. 99% of the threads on this forum fit this description in some way. And while I appreciate that you're putting so much thought into this debate, I'm afraid that it is weaker to argue from the position of being in the advantaged group and freely admitting that you're not deeply interested in glamour. I'm not interested in DRG rotations so I'd expect to meet some resistance if I tried to tell them that they don't really matter in a thread devoted to that topic.

I will grant that my suggestion of adding a warning to the character selection screen is ridiculous, but in principle the alternative is supporting the company profiting (in the form of name changes and fantasia sales) from a system where players are encouraged to pick whichever options they like during character creation only to find that the treatment differs later on. I don't think that's fair. Obviously I don't actually want them to put a warning on the character creation screen at all - I actually want equal treatment with glamours - but if so much time can pass with this kind of thing continuing to crop up then I think that's an equally silly alternative to the current status quo. And it doesn't financially reward a company for overlooking this irritating situation time after time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Felis

http://xivdb.com/item/14868/Uraeus+Skirt
with no pants or socks

---

That's the best thing I've seen in 3.2 so far. Even though it's just a rehashed of 1.0 skirt barred the socks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Serilda

Well of course you are, you are posting with a female character! Kudos for replying to me complaining about the 'it doesn't affect me so it's not a problem at all' crowd by making that exact argument in response.

In any case, I'm not going to stop posting about the imbalance until the problem goes away so it may be best to avoid threads on this particular topic if glamour isn't interesting to you.

---

Oh geez... your one THOSE people. Sigh...
Guess my opinion doesn't count because I play a FEMALE. Jealously much? And for the record, I have a male alt that I play. Many people have alts. So when I play my alt, I get shafted on this gender locked gear as well, and I still couldn't care wither or not they get access to the same gear. But hey, because I posted in the forums with an icon of a female toon, suddenly my voice doesn't make any sound.

Look, if they make all the gear unisex, then great wonderful more power to you; but seriously... it's just a game. Don't cry over split milk and bring real world equality issues into something that's suppose to be fun and relaxing.(Seriously, leave that stuff at Tumblr please). And I'm sorry, but if not being able to wear gender locked gear is the one thing that is destroying your fun, then maybe you should find something with more customizable options?

gender locked gloves feel unnecessary. with skirts and dresses at least, i can understand why people would not want it but gloves? males can wear gloves far more feminine then the ones that were just gender locked. like the eso WHM gloves.