You mean they are both junk? I guess from that sense that is correct. Scholar too me is more the worry than red mage for Cure V. I would probably be ok with Red Mage having cure 5, mainly because having both red mage and white mage I know what a weak group healer red mage is. It's horrible to heal AOE damage on Red Mage. Scholar is right on the cusp of being overpowered though, always has been. If scholar had T5 nukes taken from them I would support them getting Cure 5, but not as is. Therein lies another problem, once a spell is given, it won't be taken away. Why SE is hesitating on giving Cure 5 out.
Yes, tier 1's are stronger than cure. But when comparing the enemy's HP to yours, it should make sense looking at it that way, I hope.
Either way, before this gets into headache territory, I'm only saying that I'm not going to accept RDM getting Cure 5 without getting something else that keeps it from being a secondary solo white mage.
Last edited by Quetzacoatl; 10-04-2011 at 09:51 AM.
This doesn't reduce the fact that Cure IV is still not enough, not unless they want to increase the soft-cap.
---
I actually don't think RDM nuking is that bad, it's come quite a long way recently.
OFF TOPIC: Has anyone checked if RDM got MDB III this update, they should have to fall in like with MAB III at 90, I wouldn't know how to check it.
Last edited by Daniel_Hatcher; 10-04-2011 at 09:54 AM.
|
|
© SQUARE ENIX FINAL FANTASY, SQUARE ENIX, and the SQUARE ENIX logo are registered trademarks of Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. Vana'diel , Tetra Master, PLAYONLINE, the PLAYONLINE logo, Rise of the Zilart, Chains of Promathia, Treasures of Aht Urhgan, and Wings of the Goddess are registered trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd. The rating icon is a registered trademark of the Entertainment Software Association. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Online play requires internet connection. |