Thanks for Temper SE

[saevel]

you were the one that came in here saying it was effective. Parsing shows if that is actually true. Or would you prefer we go back to 2005 where we still though melee sucked and blm were WTF awesome because they casted a spell once per fight but that spell did super damage?


Basically, you don't have to parse, you don't have to care about your "l33t" DD. But it's rather silly for you to come in and post that you did good damage without any proof to back it up.

Except when the "fight" part of the fight is 30s, parsed data would mean absolutely nothing other then to determine Accuracy / Defense and such stats of the NM. Seriously, building TH takes longer on the NM then unleashing on it. So the argument of "deal optimal damage to make fight shorter" doesn't work. Next time I'm at event killer mass mobs I'll parse it, but on NM's it's just not worth it. Especially when the person with the highest "damage" will the PLD and THF's who are on it all the time.

[Romanova]

Except when the "fight" part of the fight is 30s, parsed data would mean absolutely nothing other then to determine Accuracy / Defense and such stats of the NM. Seriously, building TH takes longer on the NM then unleashing on it. So the argument of "deal optimal damage to make fight shorter" doesn't work. Next time I'm at event killer mass mobs I'll parse it, but on NM's it's just not worth it. Especially when the person with the highest "damage" will the PLD and THF's who are on it all the time.

that's when you start creating controlled situations so you can parse to actually show some data. Basically, if you've got no data on how good it is, a lot of people just aren't going to believe you (or shouldn't).