Quote Originally Posted by MarkovChain View Post

I used this for relic and this for empy. And no they are not the best the final difference is self explanitory as to why better sets won't change the ratio a lot.

1301 damage average
1834 damage average
Ragnarok
121 badedamage 90+68str 64+48mnd 62+25chr
121 158 112 87
(121+18+38+29)*3.28*1.73*1.25=1461
206 675.68 1168.9264 1461.158
1461 Average

Caladbolg
120 basedamage 90+73str 78+32vit
120 163 110
(120+19+56)*5.05*1.73=1703
195 984.75 1703.6175
1703 Average

Why is it that when I use your pdif value, and my characters stats with your sets my numbers are so much different than yours? Not that either of these sets are optimal, I'm just pointing out that you must of done something wrong cause my torcleaver isn't that far ahead of scourge, like 15%, not 40% =3