Common Courtesy

[Ordain]

7 years ago even though it was only started yesterday?

He said 7 pages ago, don't take it out of context against your fellow man.

----

All I can see is Linh is a person who though may not realise it is rather selfish.

Would you have gotten scammed? No. Why? Because the rules prevented any scamming to take place.

This is what you have said the rules are.

a) You have a CHANCE to lot on the Behemoth Tongue if it drops, period.
b) They also can and will try to lot on the Behemoth Tongue.
c) They can lot on your Shank.
d) (This part is unclear, you never tell us if YOU can lot on your Shank or not.)

Now if you both can lot on the tongue and the shank. It's an equal trade deal. You both have been given boosted rates and better chances as such.

If you can not loot on your shank then from what you've told us, you didn't clarify the deal good enough. I could see if this was the case that it would seem like a scam, but since you didn't get it all fleshed out ahead of time it really isn't.

---

You warping out when you saw that the deal wasn't what you thought you got into was right, to some degree. It also was wrong. Though you made a mistake you did BREAK you're part of the deal. Even though you weren't aware fully to the terms.

There was no Confidence Man act pulled on you. Simply you CHOSE not to read or ask about the small print. It's everywhere and if you ignore it, it will ALWAYS bite you in the rear.

[Linh]

This is what you have said the rules are.

a) You have a CHANCE to lot on the Behemoth Tongue if it drops, period.
b) They also can and will try to lot on the Behemoth Tongue.
c) They can lot on your Shank.
d) (This part is unclear, you never tell us if YOU can lot on your Shank or not.)

Now if you both can lot on the tongue and the shank. It's an equal trade deal. You both have been given boosted rates and better chances as such.

If you can not loot on your shank then from what you've told us, you didn't clarify the deal good enough. I could see if this was the case that it would seem like a scam, but since you didn't get it all fleshed out ahead of time it really isn't.

---

You warping out when you saw that the deal wasn't what you thought you got into was right, to some degree. It also was wrong. Though you made a mistake you did BREAK you're part of the deal. Even though you weren't aware fully to the terms.

There was no Confidence Man act pulled on you. Simply you CHOSE not to read or ask about the small print. It's everywhere and if you ignore it, it will ALWAYS bite you in the rear.

I did not even ask if I could lot on my own shank. I asked if I could KEEP my own shank.

And small print? I stated before I don't live in some perpetual state of a flick or something to always expecting my fellow man to do me wrong and screw me over. Common Courtesy dictates this as what I strongly had faith in:

Here's how I'm interpreting this. In the original post, the tell said the TC would have a chance to lot on the tongue in exchange for the the shank. No tongue, no chance to lot. Therefore I side with TC.

I've seen similar deals set up with Royale Ramble back in the day. Members would trade their ingot to lot a weapon that they wanted.

, not that words would be convoluted into:

"You only can lot, I didn't say you would win it."

As this would deteoriate into (due to all this Face Value convoluted mess):

"You can lot, but that doesn't mean I can't kick you from the party after you do."

All of that is truly trying to keep your fellow man down.

He said 7 pages ago, don't take it out of context against your fellow man.

Alright, my bad.