Originally Posted by
ty_taurus
We don't have it really good right now given how much frustration stems from job design. It shouldn't be this extreme, and balance isn't perfect right now either despite how railroaded job design has gotten. There will always be some amount of job exclusion because the cause of that is not job imbalance, it's party leaders that haven't passed their critical thinking test. You can always find a party to do savage with as any job. You can do that now, and you could do that in HW too. If the criteria that makes HW have bad design is certain jobs were excluded by some players, then I guess DT is also just as bad. To my knowledge, certain role imbalances have been far more egregious than anything we saw in HW. But for the record, not many people are asking for HW back. If anything, the more common answer is SB, though realistically the answer is something new with a balance of depth and simplicity on par with SB.