I don't think they care enough to do such thing and no, it's not the best we have, it's the only one we have. Which can be disregarded because of how biased it is.
Printable View
So much salt in here.
Btw people voting for genderlocks makes them a minority as well. A minority of a minority, I suppose.
to me, this seems like a 'false dilemma fallacy'. When we're thinking its an "either/or" simply because there is no other option. but in reality, the only option is deceptive [this poll] and a better, less biased option should be pursued [doesn't exist at this time].
I don't care about the genderlock but I'm probably borderline supporting it because I have no interest in male viera or hrothgars in their entirety. It's not out of petty, it's just not an interest of mine. I care more about memorable, engaging combat encounters, job balancing, and diverse equipment models.
It doesn't bother me at all. I don't really see much wrong with genderlocking (at least in this case) in principle either.
Just stop to create new threads. There are enough! And stop pretending to talk for the majority. The majority don't care that much about genderlock. Don't take your obsession for universal. Talking of a noisy minority would be fairly more exact.
The following message resume everything :
"majority" ? I don't want ... keep going SE ignore the blame form few who scream loud to get heard.
Threads like these do more to push people away from supporting the OP and moving opinions toward hoping they don't cater to their unreasonable spam and push for this even after the team said they are evaluating feedback and will give a response. The one thing for sure is those pushing for this are NOT A MAJORITY.
The question of how to spend the resources is a genuine one and lets not kid ourselves creating two addition genders isn't an inexpensive proposition. The Director and the team will hopefully clarify what will happen soon so we can move on and put this issue to rest.