So, after the patch, how goes it with Paladin?

When has that happened? T8 missile, A1 prey, and T4 spins are the only things I can think of off the top of my head. Oh, well the slaps in A3 I suppose would actually be a good example.

Right now you can't really have major physical damage on the whole party because healers have a disproportionately high amount of magic defense compared to physical defense. All the physical damage above is part of a mechanic that you are intended to do to lower that damage to easily managed levels.

The system is designed originally around physical damage=>tanks (sometimes melee), magic damage=>party.

The Bahamut farts on T13 were physical too, but yeah, physical raid-damage are a big minority in this game. Everything is magical.

Am I really the only one who's seen the Shield Swipe change as a nerf? It's on a 15 second cooldown (as opposed to 2.5 seconds), still requires a proc to use, and deals LESS damage. So, we can use it less often, and it has less damage. Using Shield Swipe on mobs was my bread and butter, as it nullified some of their worst attacks.

I've played Paladin a lot less since the update. It's just taken a lot of the fun out of the job for me. Seriously, who gives a care about the TP costs? They're not even that big of a reduction. I'm more concerned about them screwing up the skills I use regularly.

@Lemuria: The devs most likely mainly only looked at raidsituations when they changed the skill. When tanking bosses, especially in raids, most didn't use the skill at all, since it got lower damage than the combos and pacification doesn't work on those targets. Kinda funny how many of our debuffs are only useful again normal trashmobs, and useless against bosses. I think it's time that they made an overhaul of the entire skillset for PLD.

It's not a nerf because it's off GCD now so it has no opportunity cost. It's an underwhelming upgrade, but it's still an upgrade. Pacification should just be replaced if they're not going to stick it on another class, because it will never be allowed to be really useful. Same thing with One Ilm Punch's dispel. If they're supposed to be for PVP, stick them on PVP moves.

@Lemuria:
If you're not utilizing an oGCD attack every chance you can, you're doing it wrong.

150 potency every 15 seconds is actually a solid dmg increase. Let's compare the other tank attacks that fill a similar role. Brutal Swing (WAR skill) has a 100 potency attack & a 20 second recast time. Reprisal (DRK skill) has a 210 potency attack & a 30 second recast time & requires a parry. If we assume a 30 second time period:

• PLD uses Shield Swipe twice for 300 potency total;
• WAR uses Brutal Swing once for a 100 potency total;
• and DRK uses Reprisal once for a 210 potency total.

I see no reason for to complain about Shield Swipe.

I can't believe that so much people don't understand what an oGCD is

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Freyyy

I can't believe that so much people don't understand what an oGCD is

---

This board has like... 2 posters that actually play the job at a high level and have an educated opinion about the issues. What were you expecting?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brian_

This board has like... 2 posters that actually play the job at a high level and have an educated opinion about the issues. What were you expecting?

---

/pets The grumpy one, "May you feel better today, and tomorrow." :3

...lol had to do it, since you seem to be idk grumpy to me sometimes in your post. Reading ffxiv threads are bad for your health anyways, but for me the ones involving Pld, just makes me sad. D; So I read them less now, I feel little better now. :D

-fyi Brian_ just poking/goofing around, so don't take what I said with any weight.


As for Pld changes:

Nothing has change for Pld in endgame content, not even a little bit after the "buffs." Really in all seriousness, SE actually give decent buffs to Pld. Making content around Pld does not change it's outlook in the future. All it does is make us feel Pld is okay, when it is not. The Thordan EX Trial from what people are saying is fun to tank as a Pld...but like I would ever know...I get stuck as the ot, while the other tank a drk is mt during the fight. So we can have more group dmg as a whole...so these good feel fights made for Pld mean NOTHING TO ME, BECAUSE PLD IS STILL A PIECE OF GARBAGE IN THE META...I am personally thinking about dropping my static group over this, because I can't tank the one fight made fun for Pld, and make Pld enjoying to tank again to me. Personally, I feel like garbage as a Pld in endgame. Where I feel like a crappy dps with meh for dmg with medicore utilities. I have lost a lot of interest in tanking in HW, and if Pld honestly doesn't change from now to 3.2. Well I won't be staying. gg SE for "fixing" really nothing.

It's not that I'm grumpy. It's that I'm really sick and tired of all these garbage topics with nonsensical, impractical, and stupid suggestions for how a class should be changed based only on personal opinion. These days, it just seems like because they can slap you in the face with a wall of text, they deserve to be heard and noticed. They drown out the good posters with educated opinions based on experience with the hardest content -- players who actually get the most out of the class and are thus most qualified to speak about how they fall short.

Honestly - once again the biggest problem with the changes is they really don't address the clunky design issues with the Paladin toolkit.

Look at this thread - how many people made posts assuming you'd perfectly get a proc. every 15s and manage to catch Shield Swipe as it comes back off cooldown? Sorry but there is no guarantee of that happening. Even with Sheltron you have to wait for an AA to proc - meaning the appreciable DPS/Enmity gain varies heavily and is, at best, unreliable as a damage boost. The Pacification component is very nearly pointless.

Unfortunately the amount of situational skills Paladin labors under is what causes it to have a lack of utility; and those core problems create a lack-luster Tank when coupled with limited damage capabilities.

Cover is outright useless - it only redirects umitigated physical damage, and I'm going to stress this, the unmitigated damage is only redirected (and can interrupt your casts!) - so healers still have to make sure that damage won't kill you or leave your HP pool vulnerable - it at best allows you to prevent an interrupt on a caster or redirect auto-attacks away from a MT after a Tank buster. The issue here being Paladin is designed with the MT slot in mind as it's supporting functions, such as Clemency, are just too slow to be an effective stop-gap heal, and contribute to further squashing Paladin down the DPS-ladder. Clemency itself is too easily interrupted to be used practically or reliably when in a raid setting where you are target taking frequent damage, and it's MP cost further limits it's utility to two or three casts when you do manage to cast. Many of those casts will be wasted overheal or cause overheal for your healers. Divine Veil is just an AoE shield for everyone to the exception of the Paladin themselves - which again suffers under unnecessary clunk.

Clunk laid out;
Oaths - GCD loss
Cover - Phys./Range/Unmitigated/Redirected Damage = Redirected Heals
Clemency - Interrupts/MP cost/Cast time/Damage loss
Divine Veil - Heal proc/Redundancy/No effect on the Paladin
Shield Swipe - Block proc/Useless additional effect

Sub/Cross-class junk;
CNJ
Cure - Low potency/Redundant (see Clemency)
Stoneskin - Redundant/Cast time
Raise - Non-combat use only
Protect - Redundant

Paladin can limp along for now - but it is not a well designed tank by any measuring stick.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dhex

snip.

---

In the event that you don't need to save Sheltron or Bulwark for anything specific, it's not that hard to get very good overall usage efficiency with Shield Swipe. You Sheltron on the pull to force one in your opening enmity rotation, you Bulwark to force 2 more Shield Swipe procs, and then you Sheltron again to force the next. If you get a natural block during any of this, you can delay the CDs accordingly. You are also forgetting that with time and better shields, PLD's natural block rate is going to increase. In that manner, Swipe scales better than its equivalents because Reprisal is parry based and parry rating rating has horrible returns + is eating up stat budgeting that could go to crit. Block rate is not costing PLDs stat budgeting on their gear.

Even if you need to save Sheltron based on mechanics, you can easily readjust your overall skill usage around such timings.

Divine Veil is redundant? What does that even mean? It stacks with other shields and is really, really good for mechanic damage. The problem is the up-time is garbage compared to other raid mitigation. At the same time, if it had higher up-time, it would trivialize a lot of mechanic damage. Any time you buff raid mitigation like Divine Veil, you need to do so with content in mind -- and in this case, future content. A party needs to be able to live through mechanic damage. This is part of why AST / WHM groups are not a thing. SCH Adlo + Deploy on a WAR in Defiance with Conva + Sacred Soil is insane raid mitigation. Do you re-scale damage based on the possibility that a group will run PLD for DV, WAR / DRK for Path / Reprisal, MNK for DK, SCH for Adlo + Deploy + Soil + Virus, and just laugh at every single raid-wide damage mechanic while a group with a worse comp gets crushed like an ant? Or, do you scale damage down so that it is survivable regardless of comp and the optimized comps are barely tickled by it?

A lot of other classes also suffer from having largely irrelevant cross-class options. PLD is not alone in that aspect. SS has always been a very good skill. Redundant? Why? Because you expect healers to cast it on you during downtime when they often have more pressing matters to attend to?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brian_

It's not that I'm grumpy. It's that I'm really sick and tired of all these garbage topics with nonsensical, impractical, and stupid suggestions for how a class should be changed based only on personal opinion. These days, it just seems like because they can slap you in the face with a wall of text, they deserve to be heard and noticed. They drown out the good posters with educated opinions based on experience with the hardest content -- players who actually get the most out of the class and are thus most qualified to speak about how they fall short.

---

So grumpy that you're raging at how the internet works. Haha!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IndigoHawk

So grumpy that you're raging at how the internet works. Haha!

---

As if the internet is a singular entity rather than a cluster of differing communities. If you go to a forum like teamliquid and a pro-gamer or a known high ranking player posts something, people not only pay attention, but their point often dictates the direction of a conversation.

Yes, the internet.

The point is would I like to see PLD improved? Yea. Is the current state of these forums helping accomplish that? Nope.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kosmos992k

Is the reduced TP cost noticeable?

---

I'm actually having more TP problems after the patch than before. This is partially because on trash pulls, I would actually use shield swipe to pacify mobs that could do Big Damage, and I can't do that anymore, so I use more TP. The change to Goring Blade is also barely noticeable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kosmos992k

Exactly how has the behavior of Shield Swipe changed?

---

I actually find myself with fewer opportunities to use Shield Swipe after the patch as well. Most mobs don't hit physically with enough frequency for it to be the full +600 potency per minute that I thought it was going to be, and often it'll just sit there off cooldown for a few seconds before I finally block another attack. This would be alleviated by a buckler-style shield, but those aren't really available as much, unless I'm mistaken.

All in all, the changes feel insubstantial, and as though they may have actually made the job slightly worse.

With the release of the diadem "stat budgeting" is not a factor. I have already seen pieces of gear on tanks with 5-6 stats with primaries as good as other 210 equipment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brian_

In the event that you don't need to save Sheltron or Bulwark for anything specific, it's not that hard to get very good overall usage efficiency with Shield Swipe. You Sheltron on the pull to force one in your opening enmity rotation, you Bulwark to force 2 more Shield Swipe procs, and then you Sheltron again to force the next. If you get a natural block during any of this, you can delay the CDs accordingly. You are also forgetting that with time and better shields, PLD's natural block rate is going to increase. In that manner, Swipe scales better than its equivalents because Reprisal is parry based and parry rating rating has horrible returns + is eating up stat budgeting that could go to crit. Block rate is not costing PLDs stat budgeting on their gear.

---

Utilizing Bulwark does not make Shield Swipe 100% reliable. Shield Swipe being ready for use every 15s is entirely based on RNG proc timing - this is not a debatable point. It's fact. You can, at best, Sheltron proc - wait 10s Bulwark ?RNG? proc (maybe) wait 15s - wait 5s Sheltron or if RNG proc'd wait 15s leave Sheltron alone. Again - without some extreme luck you will never see perfect back-to-back-to-back use of Shield Swipe. It is a very small unreliable gain to potency and damage potential. Additionally I need to stress that Sheltron =/= Instant Shield Swipe as you still have to weather at least one Auto-Attack to activate it. All of this means variation to the potency gains from Shield Swipe. Also you throw away Sheltron as a mitigation tool in any fight where it can be used to mitigate Physical tank-busters by doing this. Yes you can fiddle with cooldown timing but it won't change anything - you can't force luck with procs. Your little argument ignores the key point being made; the damage will vary depending on unreliable proc timing. This is not a reliable change to Paladin damage. This is not a fix.

Arguing about stat budgeting in regards to Shield Block & PLD is utter nonsense since there is nothing else for us to equip in our off-hand slot so thanks for that inconsequential tidbit.

If you want a good reminder of what is wrong with PLD I suggest you try Ramuh EX - this is an example of a fight where Paladin's toolkit is extra useless and it highlights the key deficiencies we labor under.

Quote:

---

Divine Veil is redundant? What does that even mean? It stacks with other shields and is really, really good for mechanic damage.

---

Divine Veil is redundant because there are already two healer Jobs with AoE shields - if a heavy raid-wide buster is coming healers should already be putting out shields and have already determined the amount of AoE healing required to maintain raid health after the mechanic - if they couldn't do it Paladin & Divine Veil would be a 100% necessity to clear the fight. Divine Veil lets the raid "mitigate more" than it could without it but it does not provide such a significant barrier that the required healing is reduced - meaning the same amount of MP and the same number of GCDs are being expended by your Healers to top off the raid. It at best becomes a skill that is 100% situation reliant for use making it impractical when most raid-wide damage is heavily scripted - this makes Divine Veil a dead zone on the hotbar reserved for a very specific emergency. At best you might save a wayward DPS that stepped in something right before a raid-wide attack; of course assuming your healers take time to proc the shield at all. It's a superfluous skill that is a waste to the toolkit at best.

Quote:

---

A lot of other classes also suffer from having largely irrelevant cross-class options. PLD is not alone in that aspect. SS has always been a very good skill. Redundant? Why? Because you expect healers to cast it on you during downtime when they often have more pressing matters to attend to?

---

Stoneskin is 10% of your max HP. Even if you're in full VIT, with food, and a VIT bonus allotment that is still less than a 2,500HP shield. SS is a spell - thus it can be interrupted further wasting GCDs - Clemency also easily outweighs your Stoneskin shield - so the only situation where utilizing Stoneskin is viable is when you're capped HP. Think about the nature of that - because if you're low on HP and have no healer attention then you best be refilling your HP via Clemency (good luck with interrupts) not mitigating what equates to roughly an Auto-Attack. If you are capped HP you already have Healer attention/Regens/Fairy and should be focusing on your damage output and completing the main goal - kill the monster/push the phase. Stoneskin becomes a redundant, even useless, spell. If you're using it to shield other players you're deliberately squashing your own Damage/Enmity output for even smaller inconsequential shields. If you're using it as an OT you're deliberately squashing your own Damage output; which by-in-large is what most raids need from an OT slot.

CNJ contributes nothing practical to a PLD.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jpec07

I'm actually having more TP problems after the patch than before. This is partially because on trash pulls, I would actually use shield swipe to pacify mobs that could do Big Damage, and I can't do that anymore, so I use more TP.
...I actually find myself with fewer opportunities to use Shield Swipe after the patch as well. ...often it'll just sit there off cooldown for a few seconds before I finally block another attack.

---

Yeah, I've noted this as well, now that there is a 15s timer on use, the irregularity of proc'ing it means you can never achieve 4 swipes per minute on a consistent basis. So now it has reduced potency and potentially reduced occurrence since before the change we could still use Sheltron and/or Bulwark to force it. All in all, I can easily see how this change actually ends up using more TP than before and producing less DPS. Which really goes against the stated aim of the change I think.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dhex

snip

---

It's a reliable increase to PLD damage and while it's a small buff, it's still a step in the right direction. You're basically also saying that crit is a worthless stat because it's RNG when it's the best point for point secondary. Over a 10+ minute fight, you will have a consistent damage contribution from shield swipe that will be quantifiably higher if you make an active effort to increase Swipe's up-time. It might not be the perfect scenario where you get it to proc before the 15 second recast is up every time but it's entirely extra damage because it's oGCD and costs you effectively nothing.

And my point about stat budgeting is only utter nonsense to you because it went straight over your head. If you still haven't realized, our off-hand shares combined stat budgeting with our main-hand. In order for a DRK to have a higher parry rate, they actually need more parry on their gear and that parry comes at the cost of another stat. All a PLD has to do to see their block amount / block rate increase is increase their ilevel because block rate is not linked to secondary stat budgeting. It's like people have totally forgotten how strong block was in 2.5.

I don't know why I would have to go back and try Ramuh EX to experience the issues PLD has. I find that pretty laughable because I farmed the crap out of Ramuh for Markab. The strengths and weaknesses of PLD are apparent enough in current content -- if I want to feel the weakness of PLD, I can just play PLD in A4S.

Your description of Divine Veil sounds like you basically don't do any meaningful end-game progression content and makes me think having this conversation is pointless. Just look at A3S or Thordan EX. There is enough raid-wide mechanic damage that an extra shield is incredibly meaningful because like I said before, it stacks. There are scenarios in progression content where if you do not have enough shielding, people essentially get one shot and succor is not consistent enough and adlo-deploy has a 90s CD. In the early period of A3S progression sluice protean in p4+ was A LOT easier with divine veil. Mass splashes was A LOT easier with divine veil. Having an extra shield to factor into the overall healing rotation during p4+ made a big difference.

Like I said, the only downside is that its long CD means its up-time is horrible and it has a somewhat bothersome activation condition. The meat of the skill itself is hardly "impractical," "superfluous," and "a waste to the toolkit." Just because you fail to use it correctly doesn't mean it sucks.

That same logic applies to SS. Again, the way you describe it makes it sound like you don't do any meaningful progression content and don't try to get the most out of your job. There are openings to cast SS in virtually every fight. It's extra free max HP. This has been true since 2.X. As a PLD, if there is nothing to do because a boss is phasing, can't be targeted, or there is some other scripted down-time, you always want to be casting SS on someone. You can cast it before Hyper Compressed Plasma in A1S (which mattered during week 1 clears) and during jump downtime. In A3S, you can cast it during the gap in man>hand phasing in A3S, before p3, during the gap between p3 and p4, etc. In A4S, you can cast it before Mortal Revolutions. In Thordan EX you have tons of opportunities to cast it during down-time. There are plenty of opportunities to give people extra free temporary max HP without it costing you anything but MP.

It's only a dps increase short term, FB>SB>RA combo is an average potency of 230. old shield swipe potency was 210. Before they changed it with bulwark, sheltron, and natural blocks you could at times shield swipe 3+ times in a row. I had one instance where I had 7 swipes in a row. the potency may be slightly lower then a RA combo, but the TP cost more then made up for it in the long run. Now I find myself consistently running out of TP in raids where we don't have ninjas even with proper rotation between the RA combo and GB combo. Now this only came into play against physical bosses mind you, magical bosses go slightly better then before since we do have a TP reduction to our DOT combo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brian_

Twaddle.

---

I cleared FCOB & SCOB before they were nerfed to hell so sorry to disappoint you on that point - been doing Alexander Savage as well. Just because you have a different opinion on the viability of Paladin's utility is no reason to resort to direct personal attacks and making wild assumptions about my personal progression. Pretty sure we're discussing functional issues with Paladin. Not how good I am at Paladin. However you still dodge the facts presented and the issues the Paladin essentially has to work around with it's toolkit with a lot of anecdotal information. Yes, as a Paladin I too have attempted A3S; you can utilize HG to soak the first swipe ideally allowing your melee to continue their positionals and allow healers time to recap MP, and yes you can then Divine Veil between the next two swipes - but once again this is a specific situation in which to utilize the skill - and it does not make Divine Veil needed, good, or seamless. It is not practical skill or a particularly well designed skill. The Healing & MP required during the swipes phase is not drastically changed by having DV up - considering groups clear the A3S swipes without even bringing a Paladin. It works under a very specific set of circumstances - circumstances that don't even necessitate it's use. Divine Veil it is unneeded in general use and is impractical in it's design.

The comment about shields is pointless because Shields are an inherent part of Paladin's itemization. You in one breath say that they are budgeted together but then flounder around in a comparision with Dark Knight as if they're separate. Last time I checked there are only two i210 options for Sword & Board - equalizing XYZ stat on Shield, and only XY on a Sword means your potential XY cap will always be lower than a Greatsword which can only have XY. So what - Dark Knight would have to sacrifice secondaries elsewhere to equalize? Was that your point? I lost it in the pedantic explanation. It's apples to oranges. We (Paladins) avoid parry because it specifically acts as a detriment to the roll-check for damage calculation and potential of blocks. If a Dark Knight wants more Parry - they buy/craft/farm gear with it. End of story. Parry is not good for Paladin, but it is for Dark Knight. The point is moot and to continue arguing from your standpoint about "budgeting" is absolutely asinine

Stoneskin has it's use - down time. Great - what is the point of a 1500(+/-) shield when the damage to the raid is scripted? Additionally if 1500 HP making or breaking a phase/fight for any given role/class is a bad sign in any fight with the size of 3.0's HP pools - if you're failing here it's A) Healer inadequacy. B) Missing the gear metrics by a large margin. C) DPS/Tanks eating excess/avoidable damage.

The way I describe Stoneskin - and all the other problematic skills Paladin has - are to addresses the key deficiencies and draw backs in regards to utility. Divine Veil, and Stoneskin net you an almost inappreciable gain in raid-wide mitigation while crippling your damage contribution - Paladin needs to function. It needs to function well, and it needs to function in OT or MT.


I said it a few posts back - Paladin works and it can limp along for now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dhex

snip

---

What "facts" are you talking about? Because I don't see any regarding the points I took issue with.

It's not anecdotal evidence that Shield Swipe adds to your DPS if you use it. How is that anecdotal. You said "this is not a reliable change to Paladin damage." I pointed out that if that's your reasoning, neither is crit. Over a prolonged fight, it is a reliable and consistent increase in PLD DPS.

How is it anecdotal evidence that a shield that stacks with all other mitigation actually helps you mitigate damage. By your logic, Path is also not needed. Delirium / Reprisal are not needed. In that way, PLD's raid mitigation is no longer worse than DRK or WAR because it's all not needed anyways. Makes sense.

Here are some actual facts. Splash is ~2600 damage per splash. Cascade is ~12000 damage. Fluid stike is ~60000 damage split between targets. Divine Veil is ~1700-1900 HP worth of shield. Is that anecdotal mitigation? It mitigates a much larger amount of damage than Path, Delirium, and Reprisal for those abilities. In terms of raid mitigation, DV does a better job. But, LIKE I KEEP SAYING, the issue is the CD and the resulting up-time, not some irrelevant babbling about redundancy, clunk, or how it doesn't shield the PLD. I'm not even saying the ability is fine. I'm just saying that you're completely oblivious to the actual weakness of the ability.

What is the point of a free temporary 10% HP shield? Really? Staying alive as a raid is not only the healer's responsibility. It is everyone's responsibility. That's why you have abilities like Path, Delirium, Reprisal, Dragon Kick, etc. The only difference with PLD is their raid mitigation is activated / casted rather than applied. If you are going to argue that a free shield is not worth it, then applying Path, Delirium, DK, Reprisal, etc. are also not worth it. Your healer just needs to git gud.

How DV costs you damage is beyond my understanding. It has no cast time. And like I said regarding SS, you use it when you cannot deal damage or when the added damage is inconsequential and less important than staying alive.

And, I don't get what is so hard to understand about block.

If a DRK wants to proc Reprisal or Low Blow more, they need more Parry stat. More parry comes at the cost of other secondary stats.

If a PLD wants to proc Shield Swipe more, they will naturally do so as ilevels increase. More block-rate does not come at the cost of other secondary stats.

I didn't think I had to do this but I guess I need to spell out the result -- assuming gear progression and stat valuation is the same as it was in 2.X, 6 months from now DRKs will still have roughly the same proc-rate on Reprisal and Low Blow. Why? Because they will still be stacking Crit and Det instead of Parry. PLDs will have a higher proc-rate on Shield Wipe. Why? Because while they're still stacking Crit and Det, their block-rate naturally increases because of shield ilevel. Is that really so hard to understand?

Now, you're probably wondering why that matters? Well, like I originally pointed out -- Swipe scales better than its equivalents. So, while we might have low up-time based on natural block-rate now, it will change naturally in the future. Like I referenced earlier, it's like everyone forgot 2.X happened.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brian_

What "facts" are you talking about?

---

Anecdotal in it's meaning - that is to say being based on personal experience. You continually point to your experience in niché settings. Nobody is making the argument that Shield Swipe is not an appreciable DPS gain - it is not however 150 potency every 15s with any sense of reliability as some people are making it out to be. Shield Swipe is a variable amount of potential potency dependant on an unreliable source proc <- this is not a debatable point and will vary on personal experience as we all know there will be "that one guy" out there that claims to always land a Shield Swipe every 15s on cooldown always which is not feasible.

Yes - the higher the shield the more Block Rate - the more you get Shield Swipe procs yadda yadda. Someday - but not right now today. i210 is the highest and that hasn't changed or changed the (im)balance between tanks yet. Hell the potential of Shield Swipe drastically changes depending on shield type; Buckler/Kite/Tower. Still take a look at the stat distributions across a single Sword/Shield combo and you'll see stats are distributed across a wider set of secondaries; to get the absolute best itemization requires an upgraded Esoterics Shield & Gordian weapon whereas Dark Knight only requires an upgraded Deathbringer or a Gordian GS. So again your argument doesn't really hold water with me. Until Shield Swipe somehow closes the gaping chasm of a gap between a Dark Knight's MT DPS and a Paladin's MT DPS then we can start discussing imbalances in itemization and stat budgeting.

Additional points; I never said anything about DV "costing" damage anywhere - only that it potentially can save a DPS that missed being topped off - DV front loads the mitigation and has a ridiculously small effect towards easing healing requirements and overall damage intake for the duration of an encounter. Until there is a mechanic that you literally cannot survive without DV; where no DG Kick/Path/Adlo will ever be enough then it's just a security blanket of "extra" to pad for healers that have trouble timing heals or DPS that make mistakes before raid-wide hits. DV provides a short lull after a raid-wide where a healer might save a single GCD or afford a slower healer with a chance to compensate - though even that is highly unlikely given that it does not so significantly decrease damage that is prevents the Healer expending the same number of GCDs and MP as they would have done if you had not used it at all.

You fail to address the key point in the argument against Stoneskin; if damage is scripted and predictable what is the function of minor reductions to damage that healers are already going to heal through? Think about it like STR vs Excess VIT. Having mitigation like Storm's Path, Delirium, Reprisal allow both WAR & DRK to continue to actively contribute damage while reducing damage intake with minor DPS loss - Stoneskin is outright sacrificing GCDs to achieve a less effective outcome in comparison.

I normally don't bother with quoting because I trust people to remember what they've said, but this is getting ridiculous.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dhex

Even with Sheltron you have to wait for an AA to proc - meaning the appreciable DPS/Enmity gain varies heavily and is, at best, unreliable as a damage boost.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dhex

Your little argument ignores the key point being made; the damage will vary depending on unreliable proc timing. This is not a reliable change to Paladin damage.

---

I was never making the argument that it was 150 potency per 15 seconds. My point was that you can increase the proc rate of shield swipe through proper skill usage and that over the duration of a standard encounter, your DPS gain from shield swipe is going to be consistent and is going to be reliable. It is the same as crit. The damage does not vary heavily and is not unreliable as a damage boost. THOSE ARE THE WORDS YOU USED. Parse yourself using the same rotation on the same encounter 100 times. Then look at the variation in shield swipe DPS contribution. You are not going to see much of a difference.

My point with block-rate scaling is if you are a developer, how something scales greatly influences how you balance it. What do you expect them to do? Make Shield Swipe 300 potency to compensate for the lower block-rates in i210 gear? Then, when people are rocking i300 shields with 100% swipe up-time, they'll have to nerf Shield Swipe or change how block-rating works AGAIN. That's terrible planning.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dhex

I never said anything about DV "costing" damage anywhere

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dhex

Divine Veil, and Stoneskin net you an almost inappreciable gain in raid-wide mitigation while crippling your damage contribution

---

Sure.

Inappreciable gain = a higher gain than DK, Delirium, Reprisal, Path, etc. on key mechanics. I gave you the numbers. It's not worse for mitigating huge, scripted raid-wide damage. What IS worse is the up-time. It's not the clunk, the face that it doesn't also shield the PLD, the redundancy, or some other BS.

The point I keep making but the point you keep missing, the point you dismiss because it's "anecdotal" when it's ACTUAL REALITY. How about you actually give some real support for your claim that it doesn't impact healers in any way? You dismiss real examples of where you're wrong without any actual factual reply. You just say something and assume it's true.

Look at A3S p2. You have 2 Fluid Strikes 10 seconds apart for 60k split raid damage each. Look at A3S p4+. You have Cascade > You have Sluice Protean 20 something second later > You have Splashes shortly after. You have limited mitigation and very short windows to actually dodge, re-position, and heal. Being able to throw a Divine Veil into the mix helps A LOT. Does it change how a healer deals with incoming damage. YES. Is it necessary? No. But, by that logic, neither is Path, DK, Delirium, or Mantra.

I've had to repeat this numerous times. You have failed to actually prove anything otherwise and just continue to spew unsupported garbage.

The use of SS is nothing like STR vs. VIT because YOU ARE NOT SACRIFICING DPS. For the last time, you use Stone Skin during downtime. How do you lose DPS when you cannot attack the boss? The difference is instead of maintaining it through active upkeep, you cast it during a pause in the fight and it's active until it is used up. If I cast SS on a DPS and they end up taking a 3k damage unavoidable hit, SS just mitigated ~1300 damage. In comparison, if Path was up on the boss, it would've only mitigated effectively 300 damage on said DPS.

And that's how the walltext battle started

I think the difficulty here is a disconnect in ideologies that comes back to the current tanking paradigm/meta. In the current situation, because of how predictable and low the damage going out is, and because of how tight the DPS checks are, groups in general are prioritizing DPS capability over just about anything else. Tanks are actively encouraged to gear Slaying for max-level content, and to tank in their DPS stance as often as possible because of how precious DPS is. While a pair of excellent healers will be able to capitalize on extra mitigation to greater effect, the majority of healers simply don't have that capacity for one reason or another. And so the damage meta persists and reigns.

Extra mitigation is good. As a tank, any time you can give yourself even a small chance at taking less damage, it should be The Thing To Do. But because of the persistent prevalence of the DPS meta (where WAR-DRK reigns supreme), mitigation in general holds very little value. A survival-minded tank will want to Stoneskin as many autoattacks as they can, because it puts less stress on the healers. And in my Alexander Normal runs, when I've spammed Stoneskin on myself for ~50% of the fight, I've had more success than when I try to hang out in Sword Oath and DPS the boss (mostly because it means I generally require less healing, and I'm personally a lot less trusting of DF healers--and the DPS checks aren't as stringent). But I expect that in Savage, my ~18k HP pool and 1800 HP shields won't really help out that much (because of how heavily the raid relies on good DPS output).

To paraphrase my FC healer, even when there's scripted damage going out, every little bit of mitigation and healing helps contribute to their ability to keep the raid alive. I got to 195 in full Slaying, and she asked me to go Fending, bringing me back down to 190. While I saw my DPS dip a bit, she reported that because of the extra mitigation, she had a lot more room to keep her DOTs up and spam Stone/Holy (which she could get away with, because she didn't need to use as much mana to keep me up). And the extra DPS she was able to put out more than made up the difference.

Point being a good healer will be able to capitalize on every scrap of extra mitigation you can give them, but healers that can do that are relatively rare. And when you couple this with the fact that Alexander Savage trivializes mitigation, it makes Paladins feel about as useful as mounted cavalry in modern warfare.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Freyyy

And that's how the walltext battle started

---

They're both PLDs. It's like watching them try to kill each other with pool noodles.

EDIT: What's also interesting (intentional or not) is how Clemency scales. When you're Fending-geared, Stoneskin is more mana-efficient, because it will shield for 1800-2000 (actual mileage may vary), while I've seen Clemency only hit for 3500-4500 (so a little more than double the mana for a little more than double the healing). However, in Slaying gear, because Clemency scales with Strength, I've noticed my Clemency consistently topping 7000-8000 (while Stoneskin only mitigates 1450-1500). This makes Clemency about five times as mana efficient as Stoneskin. Not sure what this says about the skills and the tanking paradigm/meta, but I wanted to float it out there.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jpec07

Extra mitigation is good. As a tank, any time you can give yourself even a small chance at taking less damage, it should be The Thing To Do. But because of the persistent prevalence of the DPS meta (where WAR-DRK reigns supreme), mitigation in general holds very little value. [snip]

---

I think part of it is that the "mitigation-minded guy" doesn't like the idea that doing more dps actually does equate to taking less damage overall.
In other words, if you push phases & kill the boss more quickly, you actually take less damage. That idea is VERY applicable to the current meta.


That said, I hope the next meta does require a bit more mitigation than the current meta -- on 1 or 2 fights, that is.

That's been applicable to like every boss fight that's been in the game. High DPS makes them all easier. Even in Melusine, which people like to cite as some magic fight where being good at your job makes it harder, you can just pause your DPS to wait for a shriek and still be wayyyyy better off than a low DPS team.

I understand his points but I feel maybe we both put the blinders on when it comes to compositions and effective utility - the way he describes his reality as Paladin you'd think it was some mitigation juggernaut shielding the party from otherwise unstoppable damage with it's capabilities; when in my reality the shields and utilities PLD provides are a very small amount of mitigated damage over the entire encounter's duration. Appreciable yes; but not game changing to the point that you're saving any effort or resource expenditure by your healers. If Paladin was really that indispensable people would've been bringing them up through Alexander Savage with far more regularity.

I just simply disagree with his assessment of Paladin's current state; mechanically and by design Paladin is the clunkiest most contradictory Tank design of the three. Warrior functions extremely well to the point that it is guaranteed a raid slot, and Dark Knight does roughly as well in direct mitigation as Paladin while bringing significantly more damage.

Personally when I am given the option - I readily bring my Warrior or Dark Knight rather than playing Paladin in end-game fights because they work better within the meta; they contribute more damage and provide enough usable party wide benefits that you do not need a quasi-healer tank popping Stoneskins, Clemency, or needing DV triggered to pass incoming damage checks. By bringing DRK/WAR you distribute the burden of outgoing damage more evenly - and allow groups to push/skip phases.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brannigan

That's been applicable to like every boss fight that's been in the game.

---

Of course it is, and I suspect that SE is testing out with AS1-4 & seeing how it works in a raid meta if they fully commit to the idea of groups doing that. /shrug

Addressing the topic directly, i would say that 3.1 has been good to PLD.
With the new gear available, PLDs can increase their DPS quite a fair bit via the new gear available from void ark and thordan ex.
I don't think anyone should complain about PLDs supposed lack of DPS anymore.
Just lacking the void ark body piece and 1 more week of farthing upgrade to my helm to complete my ideal gear set right now.

If anything else, i would just like clemency to be cut to 2.5 seconds cast instead of 3 seconds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AeresSilverfox

Addressing the topic directly, i would say that 3.1 has been good to PLD.

---

The only good thing in 3.1 to pld is the oGCD shield swipe, which should have been done since day one. Even in the new Thordan fight I'd say PLD is sub-par to a well played DRK and WAR.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seku

The only good thing in 3.1 to pld is the oGCD shield swipe, which should have been done since day one. Even in the new Thordan fight I'd say PLD is sub-par to a well played DRK and WAR.

---

Shelltron is pretty damn awesome for Heels tho, also Clemency and DV has its uses in there aswell.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Synestra

Shelltron is pretty damn awesome for Heels tho, also Clemency and DV has its uses in there aswell.

---

So is the DPS that goes out to allow a better chance for you to skip the first heel all together and to lower damage from ultimate end. Why would you even be using clemency in any part of the fight? DV does ease the burden on healers, I'll agree to that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seku

So is the DPS that goes out to allow a better chance for you to skip the first heel all together and to lower damage from ultimate end. Why would you even be using clemency in any part of the fight? DV does ease the burden on healers, I'll agree to that.

---

On add phase if you have shield add healer can ignore you and focus on sword tank/or keep dps:ing as shelltron+clemency is all you need to survive from blade dance as it doesnt interrupt casting, same combo works on all heels but it requires good timing(cleme lands the moment heel hits you). You will keep GB up via RB combo so might aswell use that excess mana on something usefull.