I know it's human nature, that's why this post is more about raising awareness. Just because it's human nature doesn't means it's how it should be. I mean ... human society basically is a constant fight about using logic and reasoning to fight against our natural desire and instinct. It's just that ... we always talk about how positive "reinforcement" is a better tool comparing to negative "reinforcement", yet most of the time without thinking we always opt for the latter as our default and natural option.
And maybe it IS the more natural option, doesn't mean it's good or sufficient though.
For one, I do. For two, this has been brought up so many time that I think it's stale.
Anyone who have been doing relic since 2.0 know for a fact that the relic has been constantly "adjusted" to the trench of the complains as outline in the first post. Whether you think it's a small margin or relevant margin or not, the adjustment and wave of complain matched each other almost perfectly, especially during Eureka/Borza era. It may be a causation, or just a co-relation. But I don't think you can expect a fair judgement where one side have overwhelming representative while the other side is almost invisible.
Like I said somewhere above, politic is a clear real life example. The argument of actual number is not as important as the number of actual engagement. You may believe that the people liking the game are majority (and trust me I do to), but you also need to commute it on human term. When was the last time you were praised for doing a good job? Did you like it? I know I do. How do you feel about being a content creator where the majority of the feedback you receive on your work are trash talking despite the actual result seem to indicate otherwise? How would you think that gonna do to your moral?
