PUPdate is a fail ;_;

[xiozen]

Unless SE decides it's necessary to allow more attachment slots on the frames or increase the number of elements each frame may allocate---we'll have to make some sacrifices. I personally have no problem with that. If someone can explain why you feel it's necessary to have everything you had before in addition to what has been added... that doesn't make sense to me.

Even now you must make sacrifices to equip our automatons'; not enough ice maneuvers, ok... remove something and add something else to compensate for the loss. The addition of these new attachments is really no different than anything else we already have to do... we make sacrifices in order to equip our automatons...

What this really boils down to is... Player A has gotten "use" to using his/her automaton a specific way... albeit, mage frame, ranger frame or other... Player A gets new attachments to play with from SE... Player A is "SHOCKED" that the new attachments means, he/she can't attach his/her favorite well used attachments... so Player A is confused as to how Player A can incorporate the new attachments AND keep his/her favorite well used attachments in play... OH BUT SHOCK... Player A can't keep all of the attachments Player A is use to keeping because Player A's automaton doesn't have enough slots... so, Player A grumbles and spits fire in frustration that SE delivers such "Trash"... Player A is upset because Player A doesn't want to go back to the basics of assembling his/her automaton again... Player A considers it too much work...

Adjusting is never easy...get over it. As you learned many, many levels ago to work with what we're given and MAKE IT WORK... you'll do the same with this new combination... that's all it is, additional attachments to be "COMBINED" with our automaton to create a new way to play. Experiment and have fun doing it.... don't knock it until it's implemented... try to stop passing such negative judgment prior to implementation.

[Gotterdammerung]

Unless SE decides it's necessary to allow more attachment slots on the frames or increase the number of elements each frame may allocate---we'll have to make some sacrifices. I personally have no problem with that. If someone can explain why you feel it's necessary to have everything you had before in addition to what has been added... that doesn't make sense to me.

Even now you must make sacrifices to equip our automatons'; not enough ice maneuvers, ok... remove something and add something else to compensate for the loss. The addition of these new attachments is really no different than anything else we already have to do... we make sacrifices in order to equip our automatons...

What this really boils down to is... Player A has gotten "use" to using his/her automaton a specific way... albeit, mage frame, ranger frame or other... Player A gets new attachments to play with from SE... Player A is "SHOCKED" that the new attachments means, he/she can't attach his/her favorite well used attachments... so Player A is confused as to how Player A can incorporate the new attachments AND keep his/her favorite well used attachments in play... OH BUT SHOCK... Player A can't keep all of the attachments Player A is use to keeping because Player A's automaton doesn't have enough slots... so, Player A grumbles and spits fire in frustration that SE delivers such "Trash"... Player A is upset because Player A doesn't want to go back to the basics of assembling his/her automaton again... Player A considers it too much work...

Adjusting is never easy...get over it. As you learned many, many levels ago to work with what we're given and MAKE IT WORK... you'll do the same with this new combination... that's all it is, additional attachments to be "COMBINED" with our automaton to create a new way to play. Experiment and have fun doing it.... don't knock it until it's implemented... try to stop passing such negative judgment prior to implementation.

im confused. why did u feel the need to delineate "player A" if there is no player B,C,D, ect in your example O.,o?

Anyway, on topic. I don't think people are having problems adjusting. It seems to me they are just examining the true worth of the new options and finding them mostly lacking.

[Dfoley]

im confused. why did u feel the need to delineate "player A" if there is no player B,C,D, ect in your example O.,o?

Anyway, on topic. I don't think people are having problems adjusting. It seems to me they are just examining the true worth of the new options and finding them mostly lacking.

PLayer B didnt know how to play his job
Player C didnt have the optimal attachmetns player A had so the new attachments are actually upgrades
Player D Prefered to solo outside of abyssea and never knew what he was missing.

Think that covers most of xiozens bad example...

[Bhujerba]

im confused. why did u feel the need to delineate "player A" if there is no player B,C,D, ect in your example O.,o?

LOL I just read his post xD

Player C didnt have the optimal attachmetns player A had so the new attachments are actually upgrades

or we can make All players from A to Z happy by introducing new Attachments that even OUTSHINE what we have , how about that for an upgrade? (to xio and whoever still think of side-grades is teh shit!!1!)

Even now you must make sacrifices to equip our automatons

Sacrifices... why is it perfectly fine for a Monk or Warrior or the rest of the overpowered jobs that hardly sacrifice ANYTHING but when it comes to pup or pet job in general, oh we HAVE TO SACRIFICE GUYS! we cant have our cake and eat it like the rest of the jobs!

this is a call to the rest of PUP community and beyond..., GET RID OF THE SACRIFICING MENTALITY, so we can suggest things better, is it really fair for the other jobs to be extremely powerful and useful without them sacrificing anything to reach that, but its ok (and a MUST) for us to be lower in power and usefulness with lots of sacrifices? THE HELL WITH THAT