Quote Originally Posted by Demon6324236 View Post
Agreed. No reason I should be able to watch Ifrit's erupt however, no weather at all still...
Keep seeing this type of argument in these threads. Hot lava does not automatically mean hot weather---you can have active and errupting volcanoes in snow covered regions. Ifrits is in a tropical zone, so it kinda makes sense for it to have the high rainy weather.

Some of the other zones could go different ways. Deserts are not necessarily hot, but most people do readily accept the frequent dust storms in the typical desert climate (you can have frozen areas designated as a desert)--it is the lack of humidity/high evaporation that is used for a desert classification, not the temperature. The beaches...that's a tossup I guess--typically, oceanic beaches get a fair amount of wind, and temperatures vary greatly according to location--forget exactly where the Cape is in relation to the full world map, but if it's more north then close to the equator and thus puttting it in a cooler climate, might have something to do with it not getting more hot weather cycles outside of the late spring to early fall cycles.

Halvung/Mt. Z is probably the most viable one to adjust fire weather frequency, as it's kinda just out there with no real readily defined features other than it's massive shoreline....probably why it is so dusty (lots of wind from the surrounding seas). If anything, I would expect this could be the best candidate for SE to look into tweaking for more fire occurences if they were to consider doing it. They probably have too many reasons to keep the others as they are.

And, that is probably really what you are fighting on this issue....SE's desire to stick to more real-life representations of the weather according to how things are situated in the scope of topography/geography and such.