Results -9 to 0 of 69

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player Annahya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    San d'Oria
    Posts
    107
    Character
    Annahya
    World
    Bismarck
    Main Class
    PUP Lv 99
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightfyre View Post
    As I showed, you can negate 30% of all damage taken (assuming plain 5/5 Shellra V as a baseline for MDT, more with any enhancements) with a single standard macro. That's realistic for everyone, not just PC users. There was no reason to mention Spellcast at all and doing so was in fact counterproductive because that + the quoted text implies that those who don't use it can't realistically use defensive swaps effectively, which is simply untrue.
    This shows, rather pointedly, that you did take my statement out of context, however. To take a statement that begins with "so," without considering it against what came before it, is evidence as such. Even the qualification regarding "at least for PC players" is a contextual nod to the example I gave; one that is stripped of its relevance by separating it from the previous statements.

    My statement spoke to the ability for people to use third-party macros/programs to do a great deal in the span of casting a spell, with relative ease should they be on a PC, so much so that it negates the ability to consider the timing "unrealistic." Your comments about a standard macro support my position that it is incorrect to state that it is unrealistic; but my cutting straight to the chase was not counter-productive. Your statement was a more concise counter to the person who made the original comment, but doing so does not show that it is counter-productive, nor does it invalidate its function as a conversational device.

    My statement doesn't address anything about the capabilities of those without Spellcast, either - it merely states that because Spellcast exists, one cannot state that inhumanly fast gearswapping is unrealistic, because Spellcast makes it real. That is all. What I am guilty of, in the initial post regarding Spellcast, is my inability to restrain the disgust I feel for its use - and while it does bother me that I suffered from such lack of restraint, it in no way created the implication, in my words, that it was required to do so.

    I entirely agree that one can defend oneself with standard macros, but defending oneself was not the crux of my statement.

    Quote Originally Posted by Nightfyre View Post
    I assumed that you had enough experience and understanding of BLU mechanics to know that physical spell damage, especially the damage of spells that neither have an attack bonus nor the ability to crit, will take a nosedive on high level/def targets and thus could only infer that you were using Delta Thrust on such NMs for the Plague effect given that it would otherwise be quite useless in that situation. I apologize and assure you I will not make that mistake again.
    I hope I am mistaken in reading combative tone into this - it reads as though you are insulting me for clarifying my position in a way that used your quotes to thank you, and make a general obsevation about "consequence."

    "To someone who" wasn't a reference to anyone but the one who said "i understand delta thrust is a good spell but i dont understand how people can act like they use it anywhere but xping and then say its worth wasting half your set points on fast cast."

    And in my initial post, like others also said, I commented that combining this into one sentence was confusing, so I was addressing the points separately. "I understand delta thrust is a good spell but i dont understand how people can act like they use it anywhere but xping" influenced my comment of "clearly spelling out the spell's capabilities to someone who appeared not to fully comprehend its value." To wit, "why would you use it on anything but exp?" "Because it has great damage-to-cost ratio, and can debuff the monster."

    Hopefully that clarifies any confusion.
    ~Anna

    [Edit: I went back and removed the "First," from the beginning of a sentence you quoted. This was a legacy from a previous structure that I had not caught in the proofread, and I feared it may have cause some confusion regarding tone, subjects, etc. - the initial post also bears a note regarding the edit. I apologize if that was part of the confusion.]
    (0)
    Last edited by Annahya; 12-31-2011 at 01:31 PM.
    "Play the way you want and have a good time - but understand that your performance can have an effect on the fun of others. Be effective for those counting on you, and never lose sight of the fact that enjoyment for yourself and others is the ultimate goal."