Common Courtesy

[Hoshi]

I can't believe all of you are defending Futchy lol.... and I've been thinking that since page 1 >.>;;;. Perhaps it comes from being on a server with him but I know he's a scammer and a mean spirited person. Don't get me wrong, I'm not impressed with Linh either (some of the stuff he posts on these forums is bizarre +1) but it sounds like he was being scammed by Futchy. YOYD means your orb your drop and if someone says you can lot on something on their orb that does not preclude YOYD.

[Tamoa]

If the deal was "you can lot on BB item if it drops on someone else's orb, we get to lot your behe pop item whether you get BB item or not" then fine. To me, the way the OP is wording it, the agreement was left wide open to being misinterpreted. Especially with the term YOYD being used.

[rog]

I can't believe all of you are defending Futchy lol.... and I've been thinking that since page 1 >.>;;;. Perhaps it comes from being on a server with him but I know he's a scammer and a mean spirited person. Don't get me wrong, I'm not impressed with Linh either (some of the stuff he posts on these forums is bizarre +1) but it sounds like he was being scammed by Futchy. YOYD means your orb your drop and if someone says you can lot on something on their orb that does not preclude YOYD.

It does not matter who the person was. He was right, and the OP was wrong. If the OP said lolfutch, and purposely ran off without using his orb, then we would not be discussing this. However he tried to blame the other guy when in fact he was right this time.

[Hoshi]

He was right? The OP states that the deal was YOYD and you can lot on our behe tongues. He does not mention any deal about the shanks. If the deal was you can lot on our behe tongues and we get to keep your shank that would be one thing but if you find that in the OP let me know.

[rog]

"The deal was [...]we still get your shank.

Was pretty clear to me.

[Arcon]

He was right? The OP states that the deal was YOYD and you can lot on our behe tongues. He does not mention any deal about the shanks. If the deal was you can lot on our behe tongues and we get to keep your shank that would be one thing but if you find that in the OP let me know.

[..] "No, the deal was for a CHANCE to lot the TONGUE on our orbs in return for your shank. [..]"

There .

[Hoshi]

How much should it matter in this game?

I asked if I still get to keep my shank if my orb didn't drop Tongue. He said that wasn't part of the deal I made, that it wasn't his fault I misinterpret the deal.

"The deal was not for the BB item itself, but the chance for you to lot it if it drops on our orb. Even if it doesn't drop on your orb, we still get your shank. You misinterpret the deal, not our fault."

From this post no deal was made about the shank beforehand. Really the point is moot, in YOYD runs you ask for QM and leader or someone runs off with your PCC (usually Futchy... what a coincidence).

[rog]

From this post no deal was made about the shank beforehand.

Yes there was, he clearly refers to it.

[Hoshi]

Ahh I see ... 5 posts down. Fair enough. I still cheer for anyone who pulls a number on Futchy though. >.>

[Zyeriis]

If the deal was "you can lot on BB item if it drops on someone else's orb, we get to lot your behe pop item whether you get BB item or not" then fine. To me, the way the OP is wording it, the agreement was left wide open to being misinterpreted. Especially with the term YOYD being used.

That's because the OP left out the actual quote line for the /tell where the other guy proposed the deal. He also left out the part about the shank until he started talking about when it was his turn. Also forgetting that the OP waited until it was his turn before getting "clarification", and that was only because he tried to back out of the deal just because it didn't drop yet. Which leads it open to interpretation that the OP knew full-well, or at least had some degree of understanding, what the deal was. Since he didn't get anything out of the deal, he decided to not use his orb, and save it for the next group, where I can assume he'll try the same thing again. Which would be to get the Tongue off of some one else's orb.

The YOYD argument holds no water whatsoever when the OP agreed upon something that completely contradicts that. If he wanted YOYD, he shouldn't have agreed nor should he have gone. He just wanted YOYD, so long as it was only his orb.