Tell me something, when you ran out of mp (and you have at least once) what happened to you and the pt?
Printable View
A label doesn't make something so. I could label a Warrior a healer but does it make it a healer? Sing the songs when they are needed. Or perhaps I should throw up cleric stance, ignore healing and "Pride" myself on being a better DPS then whoever. We do what can to help our pt. that is everyone's job. Screw labels.
What makes you even say that when I'm over 20% of dps in endgame raids, sometimes I wonder if people in the forums see the bigger picture, all content has been designed with no bards in the setup in mind. If you so desperately need a song that you call bards who don't sing bad, then just You're just a bad player period
I don't need disembowel to show up dps who don't know how to play their job
What, your logic is different and completely different than mine, I'm basing this off the label sqaure enix gave each job accordingly. Healers heal (green icon) dps do damage (red icon) and tanks keep aggro/mitigate (blue icon) bard is a dps (red icon) so they can focus on dps if they want
Lack of the proper learning curve would create a bunch of players who have no idea on how to play their own job. You can check out blizzard's lol instant lvl 90 cash grab and it's social impact and bad influence on the players. Is it just bard?
Oh now I know your lieing. I'm sorry but nobody is 100% perfect (yes that is exactly what you are implying.) You keep implying with everyone of your posts that it's always someone else's fault. That you can do no wrong. The point of this thread is for bards to sing when they are needed to sing. Not blame someone else for their own inaction. Take the hint.
EDITING THIS TO INFORM YOU ALL
Daily post limit reached which Is lame, wanted to say so much, but until another controversial topic comes up, I doubt you all will see me. :P bring more to the table, I play songs and my raid all does over 400 dps on t8. Monk and drg over 450. T9 is when im 20 percent dps but that's because bard is most suited in that fight. Anyway I don't think any song is needed in 4 mans or 24 mans except foes, none of the fights are long enough to strain tp and if you die or others die and your mp ooms you need to have back up to get out those situations, I'm not perfect, but reality check, I know what bard is, and it's a dps so I'm going to focus on it more than your badly managed mp pool
But if you have the skills that can help your group if the situation arises, then you should use them! Why is that such a hard concept to grasp? Do DPS players forget about their self-healing skills and SMNs refuse to SC Ress because they're not "green icon" so they can just focus on DPS if they want? That's the whole concept of utility, and BRDs just happen to have the most of it. Lack of flexibility will make you a poor group player, no matter how good you claim your DPS to be.
Right, you are saying that because a bard is labeled a DPS that that is what they should *only* be doing. That is not true. Everyone should do what they can to support the pt. I have even seen monks tank with fists of earth and skullsunderer. My logic: labels mean NOTHING.
You implied that you were perfect from the start. Do you honestly think your the first person figure out how to say something without actually saying it? Stop fooling yourself. Stop looking for reasons not to use song. Sooner or later, they will be needed and it will be your job to sing the songs that are needed. Period.
Stop trolling.... please. We all know Bard is a DPS. It's listed on the box.
The point that you're not getting or perhaps refusing to get is that Bards are DPS, but they're the weakest dps out of ALL other dps classes (assuming gears of equal tier). The trade off for being the weakest is the ability to sing songs that benefit the survival and dmg output of the rest of the team PERIOD.
Without songs, I wouldn't even consider bards in most encounters simply because their dmg output is crap without the utility. Think of Bards as insurance, they suck but you pony up the money anyway in case shit happens.
And people think I'm bad because if what I posted in the earlier pages...a lot of the stuff posted here now doesn't even compare to what I posted....
I don't really enjoy bard's dps style but these threads make me use it in dungeons and trials for the last couple days (I had it at 50 for a while because I was bored).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v67r4UHs4m0
the dancers: bards
the cops: me and other non bards
Problem was trying to make archer become bard in the first place. If it was obv. a DD class with no support abilities as a class itself, then it should have become a Ranger not a Bard. So you force people who choose ARC as a beginning class cause shooting bows is cool, then half way through tell them they are a support class. The fact BRD's LB is a healer LB makes it more ridiculous.
I wonder if bard was truly a pure DPS why don't they have a DPS LB. Some people want to play in ignorance fine. But hopefully not everyone is that bad of a bard. I feel like this thread got trolled really hard. I feel silly for feeding it :/
I have no idea why this thread is continuing for this long. The amount of butthurt here is unfathomably through the roof.
The thread is targeted at a few players that play bard but don't know when to use songs. It doesn't imply that all bards are bad.
There are tons of threads regarding bad experiences with WHMs, PLDs or other healers and tanks. But that doesn't mean all WHMs or PLDs are bad either. In fact, in those threads, people don't get all butthurt like in this thread.
If there is a thread that complains of tanks that don't use flash, you don't see the tanks raging. Because it's just targeted at a few specific players that don't know how to play the class.
If you see a thread complaining about Scholars that don't shield pre-emptively, you don't see all the Scholars raging either.
So, my question to the Bards raging in this thread is, "Why so mad?".
Not really. That's basically what you call a support role, no matter how much Bards will hate the term. Yet it's because of their, I'm a DD only, mentality that preventable wipes happen. If they managed their songs better and realize that maybe using the LB3 instead of a healer that it would be much better all around. Yet they are bards that would rather ignore a large portion of their toolkit for the sake of a childish statement.
Bards aren't the only offenders though yet they stand out the most because they have a big toolkit that revolves around supporting their party
Sure, but it sounds like the support role was haphazardly plopped on. Heck "support" isn't a valid role in the trinity. I'm not saying bard isn't a support role, I'm just saying the way it was designed seems off, and would cause some players to treat BRD strictly like a DD due to the fact that the game tells you it is besides a few spells it gives you post lvl 30. Then again, the game is suppose to "branch off" post 30, but since it's strictly ARC>BRD, it is strange.
I agree especially since it's a shame that it's currently the only range physical DD until the gunner class is released or they make a secondary job for archer. Yet in the long run it wont be the only job of its kind so it's better to get used to it now so those that decide to play class/job that plays like the current Bard, per se Dancer. Those player don't go around doing the same thing Bards currently do that don't want to use their full kit.
Once upon a time there was a elfish bard.
http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2..._Artwork_2.jpg
Who wanted to be human.
http://www.ffxivinfo.com/images/disciplines/bard.png
Because they wanted to be with a prince who despised elfish people.
http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2..._Form_KHII.png
Her father said No to buying a fantasia since she had already bought one before.
http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/...wkxirisjpg.jpg
The elfish girl was upset and ran to the evil witch and made a deal but at the cost of her voice
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_brUUlX3EFZ...600/Ursula.jpg
This is why bards don't sing.
THE END