Pictomancer is insanely overtuned and needs to be fixed before savage drops.

The lack of changes to Pictomancer is weird. it feels like they are waiting to see if it is actually overperforming in content that is level relevant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jason_Ashford

The lack of changes to Pictomancer is weird. it feels like they are waiting to see if it is actually overperforming in content that is level relevant.

---

VPR changes are a net buff, so it's probably gonna be top dog in al three categories unless the fight is unforgivable for melee and passable for casters anyway.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jason_Ashford

The lack of changes to Pictomancer is weird. it feels like they are waiting to see if it is actually overperforming in content that is level relevant.

---

Maybe it’s because people are dramatic with out “OP” it is?

I'm glad they didn't nerf PCT. I think it's overall a better feel to just leave a job as is and then buff the ones that need it, which they did.

Well Ice paradox is back which is nice. I didn't expect this because I have low standards for the job design team but still doesn't fix how awful fire phase feels, hopefully its a step in the right direction for BLM.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Memyx

I'm glad they didn't nerf PCT. I think it's overall a better feel to just leave a job as is and then buff the ones that need it, which they did.

---

I just hope they did their math better. Not nerfing it really made them do more work for themselves. Which also could have been more directed towards better changes for other jobs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jason_Ashford

The lack of changes to Pictomancer is weird. it feels like they are waiting to see if it is actually overperforming in content that is level relevant.

---

Picto is where it should be, serval underperforming jobs got buffed.

Nerfing picto makes no sense anyway considering that Picto is a caster without rez, it needs to be competitive with melee and black mage spots.

Huh... surprising, is it going to double caster double melee kind of savage then? Lol, I mean phys range kinda got dumped on again with lack of decent buffs...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rithy255

Picto is where it should be, serval underperforming jobs got buffed.

Nerfing picto makes no sense anyway considering that Picto is a caster without rez, it needs to be competitive with melee and black mage spots.

---

Right, but people seem to think that with the exception of black mage, casters should deal significantly less damage than melee.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sequora

Right, but people seem to think that with the exception of black mage, casters should deal significantly less damage than melee.

---

Melee mains think that all range should do less than melee, they have a false idea that melee uptime makes melees way harder than range when historically the hardest jobs from both a technical and uptime based standpoint have always been ranged especially casters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ramiee

a false idea that melee uptime makes melees way harder than range

---

https://i.imgur.com/ccEEjSGl.png

/tenrabbits

Hahahahahaha that is rich range being more difficult than Melee.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyth

https://i.imgur.com/ccEEjSGl.png

/tenrabbits

---

same game devs that think a weakness dot on an auto combo melee is hard and healers having one button rotations is fine when healer damage is important to the game. yeah lol.
Guess rdm should do the most damage of all range because it has a melee combo cus its so hard to stay in the massive hitbox that have been around since shb.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ramiee

same game devs that think a weakness dot on an auto combo melee is hard and healers having one button rotations is fine when healer damage is important to the game. yeah lol.
Guess rdm should do the most damage of all range because it has a melee combo cus its so hard to stay in the massive hitbox that have been around since shb.

---

It's funny when people take what the devs say as gospel just when it's convenient.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyth

https://i.imgur.com/ccEEjSGl.png

/tenrabbits

---

Just because devs say this does not make it true. Melee has never been that hard when it comes to uptime, shoot ways to solve mechs always put melees first so they don't lose uptime while casters have to suffer. I say uptime-wise casters have the hardest time with mechs and uptime bc a lot of times to solve mechs it require long moments of movement. I have never once had any issues as a melee to keep uptime and time where I do need to leave a boss it is usually only for one GCD. Don't forget you are talking about a dev team that rework a caster into a basically a phy range that is completely braindead to play(smn)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyth

https://i.imgur.com/ccEEjSGl.png

---

Kinda ballsy from them to base their balance on this reason...
While it's true maintaining melee uptime is more difficult, the gap of difficulty doesn't excuse the current DPS gap.

I'd like anyone to tell me who had difficulty maintaining melee uptime in Pandaemonium raids, DSR, TOP, EX1 or EX2.
Current savage prog is still going on but as far as I've seen, we're not dropping a lot of GCDs...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rewd

It's funny when people take what the devs say as gospel just when it's convenient.

---

If i showed the SAM description when Kaiten was removed melee players would have a lot to say about why the dev opinions don't matter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CKNovel

While it's true maintaining melee uptime is more difficult, the gap of difficulty doesn't excuse the current DPS gap.

---

The DPS gap between melee and PCT, when it exists and isn't in PCT's favour, is an order of magnitude smaller than the DPS gap between tanks and healers. I'd be curious to know if you'd be willing to have healers overlap with and conditionally outdamage tanks.

There's an expectation that players have going into melee of higher risk, higher adrenaline, higher damage gameplay. It always feels safer attacking from range. The devs design for that experience. That's not to say that you can't find skill expression on other roles, but melee exists for the thrill of the challenge.

The current issue with magical ranged DPS is that they offer tremendous flexibility collectively as a role. Gearsets make it trivial to switch jobs within the role during progression (especially in contrast with melee), giving you access to raises, raidwide mitigation, mobility, and high damage as you need between lockouts. PCT has upset the balance by being a BLM replacement that even SMN mains can swap off into while offering no real drawback outside of a loss of raise. There needs to be a bigger trade-offs in terms of ease of optimization and utility, or else the job ends up dominating progression.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyth

The DPS gap between melee and PCT, when it exists and isn't in PCT's favour, is an order of magnitude smaller than the DPS gap between tanks and healers. I'd be curious to know if you'd be willing to have healers overlap with and conditionally outdamage tanks.

---

Definitely! While it's true their rotation isn't complex, I don't think it's a good reason to have them so low, I don't think complexity of a job is a good basis for balance.
So having healers outdpsing me in a content where I must disconnect a lot or play badly? It makes sense to me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyth

There's an expectation that players have going into melee of higher risk, higher adrenaline, higher damage gameplay. It always feels safer attacking from range. The devs design for that experience. That's not to say that you can't find skill expression on other roles, but melee exists for the thrill of the challenge.

---

Well that's a correct expectation, you'd think the more fragile ranged character should be able to dish damages safely from a distance and that's been the case in many MMOs.
But in XIV the reality is completely reverse, I've played the both sides and even in Eden that mobility was worthless, most mechanics can be dealt with at melee range and we can find strategies that allows melee uptime.
Even in the case where we must disconnect, it's very rarely more than a GCD. Melee also have tools to recover much better and I just question myself if MNK isn't straight up better than DNC in terms of healing support... But that's another debate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyth

The current issue with magical ranged DPS is that they offer tremendous flexibility collectively as a role. Gearsets make it trivial to switch jobs within the role during progression (especially in contrast with melee), giving you access to raises, raidwide mitigation, mobility, and high damage as you need between lockouts. PCT has upset the balance by being a BLM replacement that even SMN mains can swap off into while offering no real drawback outside of a loss of raise. There needs to be a bigger trade-offs in terms of ease of optimization and utility, or else the job ends up dominating progression.

---

In the case of PCT that's true, the trade-off is to low for all the advantages. I don't disagree there's a need for a trade-off.
What I disagree with is that many jobs pays a tax on what should be their strengths.

PCT needs to be more taxed while RDM, SMN, MCH, BRD and DNC are overtaxed.

I think gear set are more of a game issue, there was no point in having more than 2 sets, they pretty much shot themselves in the foot with NIN gear. Plus, I don't really think you'd move away from a job during prog as you're acquainted with timings at this point.
Playing a job we're familiar with is more often better than playing a job that's meta.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyth

There's an expectation that players have going into melee of higher risk, higher adrenaline, higher damage gameplay. It always feels safer attacking from range. The devs design for that experience. That's not to say that you can't find skill expression on other roles, but melee exists for the thrill of the challenge.

---

Please, melee isn't any more risky than most of the other jobs in this game. That may be true in other MMOs but not FF14. Mechs rarely ever make melees leave the boss for more than a GCD or two plus groups go out of their way to make sure to solve mechs so melee can continue to attack the boss even making casters with long cast times like blm to move into solve those mechs. I play both caster and melee and I never felt I was safer as a range or in more danger as a melee. Both feel pretty much the same in terms of risk and danger. Also, I like to add melee this expac got one of the easiest jobs in the game outside smn that is also a selfish dps. VPR requires hardly any thought or skill to play since the job is just flowing the dotted line and does high dam with sam. I guess that's another debate for another time tho.

I say this I only accept pico doing less damage as melee job if and only if they either delete casters rise or make it a role action. The rise is the major reason the balancing of caster has always been terrible for years now and picto has made the role even harder to balance now since you now have two casters with no rise while having two that do. Smn and rdm is and will always have the caster spot in most groups bc of the rise while picto and BLM are left to fight for the 4th flex dps spot along with other melee jobs. If Picto doesn't do at least melee levels(non-sam and vpr) it will never be accepted in most groups or ppl be asked to switch to smn/rdm.

People who think that casters are easier to play than melee how do you explain casters higher IQR’s in most fights

The damage casters have the highest IQR of the roles (and RDM also has a wider IQR than most jobs and healers have far wider IQR’s than tanks)

FFlogs shows us that people struggle in modern fight design with casters more than they struggle with melee, why should PCT get taxed more heavily when the players show they consistently cannot play casters as well

The nebulous “feeling” that melee are in more danger does not translate to the rough competence of the playerbase

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Supersnow845

People who think that casters are easier to play than melee how do you explain casters higher IQR’s in most fights

The damage casters have the highest IQR of the roles (and RDM also has a wider IQR than most jobs and healers have far wider IQR’s than tanks)

FFlogs shows us that people struggle in modern fight design with casters more than they struggle with melee, why should PCT get taxed more heavily when the players show they consistently cannot play casters as well

The nebulous “feeling” that melee are in more danger does not translate to the rough competence of the playerbase

---

Agree, I really don't understand where ppl get this idea that melee is harder and in more danger than casters in the game. Im guessing that just believing whatever the devs are saying or taking what they have said at face value but melee has never really been that hard or been dangerous role.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Supersnow845

People who think that casters are easier to play than melee how do you explain casters higher IQR’s in most fights

The nebulous “feeling” that melee are in more danger does not translate to the rough competence of the playerbase

---

My experience with the XIV community seems to show that everyone thinks their job is the hardest unless it's comparing it to BLM or comparing SMN to anything else.
I believe that's because we are familiar with our job small optimisation and the risk it involves. You need to greed a cast to build ressources, you need to greed a positional, you need to pay extra attention to your tight rotation...

Difficulty is subjective and wildfly differs on the context.
There's a significant difference between a RDM in P7S and a RDM in M2S.
The same way there's a difference for a MNK between E8S and P7S. (Before the dash)

Jobs have their strengths and weakness but somehow the balance is done in a way that suggest only melee have a weakness

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Supersnow845

IQR

---

I'm also interested in the use of descriptive statistics to understand how player skill is distributed, but I think it's important to reflect on the limitations of this approach. I've tried using your approach previously, but I don't think it works quite the way that you'd expect.

First, there is no direct measure of player skill. What you can measure is DPS. Different jobs award DPS differently. While you can compare the performances of two players on the same job, it becomes much harder to correlate two performances on two different jobs. How does a 90th percentile PCT correlate to a 90th percentile GNB, for example? You're essentially comparing apples and oranges.

The next issue that arises is that the IQR is really only interested in the 25th and 75th percentiles. You have no idea what happens outside of those percentile ranges. What it tells you is how average performances vary with internal job changes, rather than letting you compare high skill play on two completely different jobs. For example, let's say that you increased the benefit of a job's damage up buff. That's probably going to benefit a player who knows their optimal opener and burst moreso than a player playing freestyle. So you'd increase the IQR without changing the difficulty of the job. What you've changed is the reward structure. You'd also increase the degree of positive skew and positive kurtosis, both of which are worth considering in your analysis as well.

But the conclusions in here precede the statistical analysis anyways.

Either way, I think the point here is not actually about comparing personal biases about relative job difficulty, but rather the fact that PCT has a lot of utility. I don't really mind if you want a high mobility, freeform job as your flagship caster instead of BLM. But you should pay a price for that utility and versatility, or lose it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyth

Either way, I think the point here is not actually about comparing personal biases about relative job difficulty, but rather the fact that PCT has a lot of utility. I don't really mind if you want a high mobility, freeform job as your flagship caster instead of BLM. But you should pay a price for that utility and versatility, or lose it.

---

You say PCT has a lot of utility but it really doesn't. In fact, it has the same amount of utility as most of the other jobs in the game. It has a team shield, well a lot of jobs have that as well or something similar to it and it has a 5% buff which again almost every nonselfish job has as well. Im not including Star Prism's heal as a utility bc is a tool no one can plan around and chances are its heal will not get any value unless the fight is designed to dish out a large amount of dam doing 2-minute burst windows. Star Prism is as useful as phoebix's heal, its a heal you have no real control over and no choice in using it since it's tied to an attack or phase in your rotation. In fact I have no clue why they even added that to star prism to begin with. Based on the amount of actually useful utility and the fact it doesn't have a rise, it is along the same lines as any of the other melees. Once again you putting too much behind the idea that Melee has the hardest time in a fight when that is just simply not true. No boss I have seen has ever forced melee out of melee range for more than a GCD or two and once again groups will always find ways to make melee uptime easier.

With all that said I don't see why PCT shouldn't do numbers close to a drg/mnk/rpr/nin since a)it has the same amount of utility as any other job, b) it has no combat riz, and c) melee uptime isn't as hard as you and small amout number players say it is. As I said a few times if PCT did number closer to the other casters then it would never be picked over an rdm or smn bc it has no rez. In fact, over half of the community will always pick rdm/smn over any other caster for the caster spot in a party bc they have to have the beloved combat rez. This only leaves PCT with one spot on a team and that is the same spot that BLM and the other melee fight over for which is the flex spot.

If pct lost its raid buff that just means it filler would have more damage and it would become even stronger to balance out the fact picto's damage is 90% from their burst phase.

If 'utility' is all you guys care about I hope you put the same energy into asking for MNK nerfs but I have yet to see it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rewd

If 'utility' is all you guys care about I hope you put the same energy into asking for MNK nerfs but I have yet to see it.

---

MNK is probably the best comparison of PCT’s utility. Earths reply and star prism are functionally identical, they both have a 5% raid buff that also provides internal rotational benefit (starry muse gives you star prism, hyperphantasia and rainbow bright, brotherhood gives you access to other players generating chakra for you) then manta while not a shield itself can buff the healers or the tanks shields like Tempra grassa. Tempra is put as stronger of the two but MNK also has more HP, riddle of earth and bloodbath

So their utility is almost identical but MNK has regularly been the highest damaging job since its rework in 5.4 to delete greased lightning stacks and nobody seems to bat an eye about it

Mantra doesn't work as a standalone action. Tempera Grassa is a 90 second recast defensive barrier that works on all types of damage. I'm sure that DRK and GNB would be willing to swap you for Dark Missionary/HoL. I think if they wanted to preserve PCT's identity as a 'BLM-type' caster, then the job should only have been released with Tempera Coat. I think adding another layer of defensives to the role (Magicked Barrier, Tempera Grassa) was a bad idea if you want the role to be damage focused, as you're essentially heading towards Physical Ranged territory with this. Addle is plenty strong on its own, given that magical raid damage tends to be more common.

Smudge is too powerful in its current design. 5 seconds of sprint uptime is a lot, especially when paired with a 20 second recast targetless gap closer. That gives you 25 seconds of sprint every minute. If you wanted to keep the Sprint effect, the recast should probably be a minute. Otherwise, the Sprint effect needs to be 1-2 seconds at most on each use.

PCT probably has closer ties to RPR, in that you have an rDPS orientated job with a lot of burst potential. A critical difference is in the resource acquisition, though. Most jobs, even burst orientated ones, still need uptime to build up their burst. This also leads to an asymmetrical burst, where your opener is usually slightly weaker than subsequent burst windows. Motifs are supposed to be your long cast actions that challenge your movement. Yet you can stockpile them out of combat and start with a full burst. It's a bit like letting RPR charge up an extra double enshroud out of combat or during downtime. Motifs should be usable in combat only, require a target, and generate enmity/a small amount of damage on use.

Another point worth mentioning is that it's much easier to swap out with a Raise Caster on PCT than you can on melee. If you want to treat PCT as being in its own separate category from the Raise Casters, then they probably should introduce gearset splits in Caster like they do for melee. Let PCT and BLM be on a separate gearset from the other two casters. If you want equivalence, you need to lose the advantages that you currently have as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Memyx

I'm glad they didn't nerf PCT. I think it's overall a better feel to just leave a job as is and then buff the ones that need it, which they did.

---

This is only a good thing if they tune the savage fights around it
if they buffed all these jobs but didn't tune the HP, then the tier becomes a joke where enrages don't matter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lyth

Mantra doesn't work as a standalone action. Tempera Grassa is a 90 second recast defensive barrier that works on all types of damage. I'm sure that DRK and GNB would be willing to swap you for Dark Missionary/HoL. I think if they wanted to preserve PCT's identity as a 'BLM-type' caster, then the job should only have been released with Tempera Coat. I think adding another layer of defensives to the role (Magicked Barrier, Tempera Grassa) was a bad idea if you want the role to be damage focused, as you're essentially heading towards Physical Ranged territory with this. Addle is plenty strong on its own, given that magical raid damage tends to be more common.

Smudge is too powerful in its current design. 5 seconds of sprint uptime is a lot, especially when paired with a 20 second recast targetless gap closer. That gives you 25 seconds of sprint every minute. If you wanted to keep the Sprint effect, the recast should probably be a minute. Otherwise, the Sprint effect needs to be 1-2 seconds at most on each use.

---

No, I wouldn't trade Heart of light. Yeah it's a bummer I can't protect raidwide but on the positive it also makes me think about where I can use DM/HoL instead of just putting circle in circle hole, cubes in cube hole.
We also had too much mitigation, so going back to physical/magical raidwide to make shine different type of mitigation is good in my opinion.

Mantra doesn't work as a standalone and is very difficult to quantify, but due to its multiplicative nature, we know it is very strong.

We don't need more caster gear, we need less melee gear or better gearing options. It also makes no sense to balance jobs based on their capacity to swap to another job.
We should... Nerf Pictomancer because it can swap to SMN? I struggle to follow you, I don't see a world where it makes sense. Imagine a world where there's only 1 type of melee gear, you would nerf Viper because Reaper or Monk exists.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MrJPtheAssassin

Agree, I really don't understand where ppl get this idea that melee is harder and in more danger than casters in the game. Im guessing that just believing whatever the devs are saying or taking what they have said at face value but melee has never really been that hard or been dangerous role.

---

BLM is supposed in line with melee dps (or even higher, im not against that)
PCT slightly under melee dps (or equal to «*melee dps with party utility, im not against that either)

Better mobility + group shield + group heal

People really underestimate how strong mantra is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CaedemSanguis

BLM is supposed in line with melee dps (or even higher, im not against that)
PCT slightly under melee dps (or equal to «*melee dps with party utility, im not against that either)

Better mobility + group shield + group heal

---

So by that logic shouldn’t MNK also be beneath melee

Group heal+better defence+heal up buff+bloodbath

Why do casters have to “justify” being equal to the melees when the melees get nearly the same utility and just do more damage because they are melee

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CaedemSanguis

BLM is supposed in line with melee dps (or even higher, im not against that)
PCT slightly under melee dps (or equal to «*melee dps with party utility, im not against that either)

Better mobility + group shield + group heal

---

PCT is supposed to be in line with BLM and melee because the developers have specifically stated so. You can agree or disagree, but they are the ones tasked with balancing and they do it according to their rules. Melee utility is not taxed so PCT's utility shouldn't be taxed either. If MNK and RPR are finally taxed for their utility and are consistently the weakest melees, then I have no problem with PCT being balanced around them. And even then, PCT being the most fragile DPS (if you use Tempera Grassa) while MNK being the sturdiest DPS along with SAM would also justify tuning PCT a bit higher in my opinion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Supersnow845

So by that logic shouldn’t MNK also be beneath melee

Group heal+better defence+heal up buff+bloodbath

Why do casters have to “justify” being equal to the melees when the melees get nearly the same utility and just do more damage because they are melee

---

yes it should be

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rewd

PCT is supposed to be in line with BLM and melee because the developers have specifically stated so. You can agree or disagree, but they are the ones tasked with balancing and they do it according to their rules. Melee utility is not taxed so PCT's utility shouldn't be taxed either. If MNK and RPR are finally taxed for their utility and are consistently the weakest melees, then I have no problem with PCT being balanced around them. And even then, PCT being the most fragile DPS (if you use Tempera Grassa) while MNK being the sturdiest DPS along with SAM would also justify tuning PCT a bit higher in my opinion.

---

why choose blm over picto if he is easier and have a group shield and a group heal ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CaedemSanguis

why choose blm over picto if he is easier and have a group shield and a group heal ?

---

Same reason you pick a SAM over a RPR.
Damage.
BLM should do more damage than PCT but PCTs current damage is fine, BLM needs a buff.
Also people normally don't pick jobs, parsers do, if you choose to be a parser you're signing up for meta monkeying.
Even though double caster is clearly stronger most pfs still have caster/phys range.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CaedemSanguis

snipl

---

I agree that BLM should do more dam and still needs buffs now. BLM should be with the other selfish dps(SAM and VPR) no one is saying it shouldn't in this thread. What we are saying is picto needs to do similar dps as of a rpr/nin/mnk/drg. Picto isn't competing for the caster slot in parties, that spot will always be filled by a caster with a rez(smn/rdm). It's competing for the flex spot in a party and that seems to be a fact so many of yall are overlooking or forgetting. With the amount of jobs in the game that offer the same types of utilities picto doesn't stand out enough. Every utility PCT has another job as well. As some said MNK offers much better utilities than PCT yet its allowed to be one of the top melee dps. Also PCT group heal is barely a utility no one going to say "Lets take PCT bc it has a group heal that can only be used every 2 mins and cant be held." The group heal is more favor than anything like smn's healing abilities. I still don't understand why PCT even has a heal tired to a burst window dmg button.

As for the comment from Lyth about how PCT can easily swap to smn/rdm. All I have to say is, so? Why do you think we should balance a job around the idea that someone can easily swap to another job with better utility? That makes no sense. It seems to me you're just mad you can't easily swap around the melees but that's not a caster issue that's a melee issue. Go beg the devs to change their gear mindset and make it where there only one melee gear set instead of 3 gear sets. We cant help that melee is like that and on one here has asked for melee to be like that. Just because I can easily switch to rdm or smn doesn't mean Im going to. I HATE post EW smn, SMN used to be my main back in SB and ShB. Smn was my baby but it was taken out back just because ppl thought the job was hard or it didn't live up to their idea of what a smn should be base on the other ff games. Because of these ppl smn has been made into a job that plays itself and as fun as a wet paper bag. Either way my point is just bc I can switch doesn't mean I will and I bet others feel the same way.

At the end of the day PCT needs to stay near the other melee in terms of dam bc its has to compete for that 4th flex spot. Parties need a reason to bring a PCT over a 2nd melee or blm. PCT with no rez will never be able to compete for caster spot unless one day they decide to finally delete the bane on the caster role that is the combat rez but till that day comes every party out there will always choose or prefer a smn/rdm bc they bring a lot more value than PCT or BLM even tho they do less dps. PCT utility isn't anything special either any of the other melees have the same amount of utility as PCT and some have better utility like mnk. This why I don't see why PCT shouldn't be doing numbers similar to a rpr/mnk/nin/drg. As for BLM it still needs a buff and should be boosted to sam levels of dps.

If we look at the collective savage statistics right now PCT is 3rd in rDPS on average (1st in gold), 2nd in cDPS (first in gold) and 5th in aDPS. We know that PCT is the strongest burster in the game but its averages are basically exactly in line with the rest of the melees and BLM (though BLM really suffers in cDPS)

Is this a roughly valid position for PCT to be in for people, all the melee are almost exactly equal right now, both the selfish and the utility melee and PCT sits with them, if you don’t want PCT where it is right now is your problem

1) its above BLM->if yes
a) would you buff BLM
b) nerf PCT
2) it sits with the melee in general
3) its gold parses are still quite high

I just really don’t see a problem with PCT’s damage profile except its comparison to being BLM damage but with utility but that’s not something that’s a valid comparison against the melees as they have equivalent or stronger utility on some of them. What is really the valid argument against PCT sitting where it’s sitting in regards to the melee (ie not BLM) that isn’t built on a nebulous belief that melee are hard and PCT is easy