Bumping this.
Printable View
Bumping this.
key mechanic for DRK being a tank IMO (even though they shouldn't be [again imo] but probably will be) is Reverse.
Well in exploring the idea of a Gladiator being the class for the DRK, I remember that shields since the Roman period were often sharpened. They were the single "no-nice you suck now" weapon of the period when made out of metal. They would bash an opponent then harshly thrust the shield to the side cutting the opponent. Due to the lack of prevalent metal armor, this was about an unstoppable tactic. So i could see a stance that made all the enmity production split between damage and enmity reduction with the exclusion of provoke (perhaps pure damage for provoke?). It would be an interesting take, on the entire job due to its history of getting a lot of attention and dealing with it, constantly fighting over enmity with the tank in XI.
Never mind he actually went to Japan and talked to the decedents of real ninjas. If you knew a little more about real ninjas you knew that they worked primarily in villages not their own, and had to blend into their environment and most importantly their community and stay that way as spies. If they were to do in-depth recon/sabatoge activity they would need to conceal their identity else their, sometimes life long, efforts would be lost and they would probably die.
Weaponizing shields happened through their entire use so it's not just a Roman era thing. Sharpening the edges of a shield doesn't even make much sense given that it weakens the defensive capability of the shield (thin outer edges) and adds significant weight (since you can't really sharpen wood, the outer rim would need to be made of metal). The only common offensive addition to a shield was a spike bolted/screwed to the center to improve the traditional shield bash without screwing with the center of balance or weakening its structural integrity. Punching with the edge of a shield wasn't an unknown tactic, but it wouldn't really need a sharp edge to cause appreciable damage since it would accomplish much the same thing as brass knuckles.
GLA already has Shield Bash and Shield Slam which cover the most of the offensive shield tactics (they're held by your hand and forearm so you have limited range of motion and, with the exception of smaller shields like bucklers and targes, they're too large to move around a great deal). The only really missing attack is punching with your shield (hitting with the edge of the shield rather than the face) but that's basically impossible with anything larger than a targe.
P.S. The roman shields everyone thinks of (scuta, sing. scutum, the tall ones that Roman infantry used) were cylindrically curved so as to deflect arrows (as opposed to block them, which is basically asking for an arrow through your arm or a broken shield) and too large to effectively move around tactically (you kept it vertical at all times). Sharpening the sides would basically be useless as would the top since it's so tall. The only edge you would bother sharpening would be the bottom though the only use would be used to slam it into the ground and attack an enemy's feet/toes in a full on melee rather than moving from side to side but that's something of a specialized and not particularly deadly tactic (if you're looking to distract, slamming their foot with an blunt edge is just as effective).
P.S.S. Metal armor was actually very common in the Roman era. Mail armor (lorica hamata) was standard issue for heavy infantry (you wouldn't want to put much armor on light infantry) and plate armor (lorica segmentata) was basically the choice of anyone who was looking to spend money on armor.
Because it's not like the Japanese hypermythologize ninjas and samurai, which was my entire point.
After the Meiji Revolution, there was a monumental amount of internal propaganda that mythologized medieval Japan. It happened over a century ago so having talked to your grandpa/grandma about ninjas, samurai, or whatever means next to nothing because they were the ones raised by the people exposed to said propaganda and most heavily influenced by it. It's why people think that every Japanese archetype was bound by and followed a code of extreme honor and self sacrifice there really *was* no code and, at best, was something like a general guideline. The government wanted to create links to their nation's heritage while they were changing *everything* by rapidly modernizing from the enforced medievalism of the Edo era while simultaneously setting exceptionally high standards of behavior for people to strive towards.
The mythologizing of the ninja and samurai are effectively the same thing as the mythologizing of the European medieval knight. No knight seriously followed the code of Chivalry nor did anyone think that the Arthurian tales were anything approaching reality. They're idealized constructs based upon what we *wanted* those archetypes to be, not what they actually were.
Fine, you can needlessly troll and dispute it all you want but it is obvious to anyone that isn't blinded by ninja fanaticism that the simularities between the outfits are worlds more in common with the assassin than your presented ninja.
http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2...a-assassin.jpghttp://www.ffcompendium.com/jobimages/3-ninjaarc-a.jpghttp://cdn.pcgamesn.com/sites/defaul...1394041545.png
Complete with similar color pallet, and similarly shaped caplet. Not really a point but both characters even have over-sized ears!
Now it is my understanding that class appearances, names, and abilities do sometimes get switched, mixed, and matched between similar jobs/abilities; for example, the Red Mage and Rune Fencer frequently do this between different games. So this could be a ninja, just looking like and maybe even named assassin to better fit the European market/esthetic.
http://img4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb2...TNinjaMale.png
and
http://cdn.vanillaforums.com/pennyar...xf4bjznwob.jpg
Ears are because...well, she's a cat person.
Side note: Why do you call everyone who disagrees with you a troll? It's fair to call you a troll since your opinion differs from ours?