Originally Posted by
Gurgeh
@voidmage , no
TwiceDamned is correct.
Good player conduct is part of the ToS.
If a party leader kept announcing in chat that they are kicking someone because of the standard of their tombstone.gg profile they would be halled up in GM jail not for having said something but for the circumstances of their kicking of someone who already joined.
If someone kept on doing it ignoring the gms they'd be account suspended.
If they kept returning from suspensoins and kept doing it they'd be account TERMINATED.
Actually, I'd argue that they most certainly are entitled to a spot, if they've posted a *public* PF. If someone doesn't like that they need to either put a static together and use private PFs, or failing that "please pay other games".
* Kick needs to be removed/disabled from 'public' PF all together
* parties can convert private to public but not the other way around
* If you don't like someone your playing with 'you leave'.
* Disband absolutely needs removing from public pf, and an auto-promote adding
* Games need recording back-end so that genuine griefers can be reported, reviewed, and dealt with by SE. If when you've cleared your M4S week 3 you come back to PF just to greif to get your kicks you'll find your self BANNED from the next tier altogether until it's open to unlimited parties.
* (and this is a big one) The PF descriptions need to be made bigger to accommodate roman alphabet languages, so that leaders can be clearer about their expectations. (No doubt that's six years of dev work though)
*Public* PFs need to be recognised as a 'two way' contract. Its not only the party leader making an investment. And the biggest investment is sitting in a boring PF lobby while it fills, only for it to be disbanded six minutes in after the 3rd pull.