
Originally Posted by
Karbuncle
First I'd like to say, The chances of empyrean wS being quests are probably 0%. you have 2 Weapon choices to get them already, One of them Clearly designed to be the "Easier" choice to just have the WS.
Secondly, In terms of Relic weapons... I know this is kinda a curve-ball, But wouldn't the Relic weapon itself be more of an accomplishment than the Sh*tty mostly useless Relic Weaponskills?
Not only would a random quested WS not get the Aftermath, It wouldn't get the DMG boost the Relic Weapons give Relic WS's on the Level 90+ Relics. (yes, Relic Ws's got a (I think it was 25%?) Boost on the 90 Weapons, Still shit mostly though).
So the Relic WS's would still be junk. Which begs the question why make them Questable, But at the same time, The anger from Relic owners over the thought of someone suggesting a Quest for them is unbelievable. They are all mostly terrible, and the True Reward form Relic Weapons is the Weapon itself, some cases, the Aftermath, not the Weaponskill. (Maybe in terms of Bow/Gun the WS, and Mercy Stroke...? Catasrophe has been about the Aftermath for the most part.)
I wouldn't mind either way, But as it stands, There are ways to use Relic Weaponskills outside of Relic Weapons (The fake-Relics in abyssea), theres ways to use empyrean weapons outside of Empyrean Weapon (WoE Gimpyreans), and theres ways to use Mythic Weaponskills outside of Mythic Weapons (The Mythic WS Quest).
SE clearly decided they wanted more than 1 way to use the above WS, and each one was given its own unique way to obtain it with less effort than the "Real" Relic/Etc. I don't see Relic/Empr being "Questable" on the same level as Mythics ever.
However, I would not be against the idea, I just see it being very unlikely.
And that theres way too much Anger from both sides over some arguably Terrible Weaponskills.