[dev1001] Item stacking

[Eeek]

I do not agree with that. This would be a better source of gil for low level players.A lot of people will be too lazy to go out and acquire a stack of 99 crystals. We already see it with stacks of 12. A stack of 99 would sell for a lot more gil than a stack of 12 would. Thus the beginning player would end up making more gil after acquiring 99 of them off monsters they killed while gaining levels outside of town.

Please reread my posts. Not once did I mention changing stack sizes for sale on the AH. Everything would still be sold in their traditional stack size as it would be a programming nightmare to adjust the AH and synthesis results to accommodate the sale of all stackable items in sizes of 99.

This has been my point all along: why bother adjusting stack sizes for items here and there when instead the developers could solve the problem once and for all by increasing the stack size for player-held items to 99.

[Ryak]

Please reread my posts. Not once did I mention changing stack sizes for sale on the AH. Everything would still be sold in their traditional stack size as it would be a programming nightmare to adjust the AH and synthesis results to accommodate the sale of all stackable items in sizes of 99.

This has been my point all along: why bother adjusting stack sizes for items here and there when instead the developers could solve the problem once and for all by increasing the stack size for player-held items to 99.

That post was not about your post. It was for Auredant's post. The part where he said new players would not make more money from it,and I disagreed with it.

[Auredant]

That post was not about your post. It was for Auredant's post. The part where he said new players would not make more money from it,and I disagreed with it.

Time will tell...but it's logical to assume that if crafter's can hold more crystals wit less space than they wont need to buy off the AH. The only ones who would would be the ones who never exp outside abbyssea i suppose.