I may have been wrong about the food; that combined with the plethora of pet acc gear for pet should be enough to hit decently on harder content (Just speculating and going by comments from other players).
I was the biggest detractor pertaining to bst buffs and food, however, I really sat down and pondered this issue. On weaker mobs, pets are not world beaters by any means, usually, endgame involves difficult mobs which our current pets struggle on.
I am not going to tell you that your experiences were wrong (Who am I to say that? Really...), considering the amount of +acc jugs receive from gear. Also, this thread shows that some individuals did have success with the new food http://www.ffxiah.com/forum/topic/43...mochi-effects/
Bst also has a pretty nasty merit ws. However, I still feel that jug pets are merely naked mobs whom are not that special (Hence does not warrant an invite over a mnk, sam, war, or rng). However, I am going to be positive for once, imo, one thing that hinders bst dd wise is poor jug selection, but that is not gonna happen hence bst will stay were it is, second class job. I still believe the overall concept of the jug is flawed, but bst would be a bandwagon job if they added a scorpion, opo, wivre, or a ram jug (With all of there moves intact). Yea, I said it, bst a bandwagon job.
The key to taking bst to the next level is a careful implementation of jugs. It appears that the devs just throw any pet out there without considering what bst really is, a damage dealer. SE should always release the monsters with the most dd potential; if our next batch contains more of the same second tier dd pets, expect more of the same....
I know you guys/gals are probably tired of me repeating this, but this is indeed a big problem; and if they finally release a dd pet, you guys/gals will see a dramatic difference. That is all I have to say really; I am tired of repeated the same stuff as you are hearing it. Gonna leave this thread until they release a true dd pet, no use repeating the same crap over and over.


Reply With Quote