Edit.V.1.1 (have to incorporate a few great ideas from players in this thread still)
TL;DR Only read the bold parts.
Hello Yoshi P. and FFXIV Devs, As someone who has supported FFXIV since its original launch and one who went to school for Game Development I'd like to take a few dozen minutes out of my day to give some suggestions that I hope you read so that maybe one of them will help you shape the world we all enjoy and love.
1) While the current housing scene is functional as a place where you can display furnishings and hang out with friends, it lacks the feeling that housing would typically have; Community. Far more often than not there is little to no engagement with your fellow residents and neighbors, making the purpose of an entire ward of houses rather than a completely instanced experienced rather unclear at best. With this in mind you would have two options to remedy the issue, either A) Do away with wards and shared area housing completely and opt for purely instanced based housing, which has the benefit of ensuring that 100% of players would be able to own a house, or B) Make the housing districts feel alive. To achieve this would be a somewhat simple task truth be told, and some of the techniques used in this could also make every other city and area feel alive as well. Option B is the option I will expand on as it has great potential and would improve the experience, rather than option A which would simply destroy it.
To begin with let's look at something simple. In this patch, aside from adding Shirogane, you also added swimming to every area and along with it you added NPC's that randomly sit around in the water swimming. This is the launch point for this "alive" feeling I'm speaking of. NPC's play a crucial role in making the world of Hydaelyn feel alive. Adding NPC's within city and sanctuary areas provides a feel of activity and liveliness, but having them stand in one spot while repeating a very small loop of animations can actually create quite the opposite effect. Rather than these small loops, if each NPC had a twenty-four Eorzean Hour schedule of set actions, where they walk from place to place, chat with other NPC's without text bubbles, disappear into buildings from time to time, these things would create that aforementioned feeling of life. Add to this interactivity with NPC's, where at set times per Eorzean day they sell exclusive or discounted items, repair gear for a reduced price, affix materia for a reduced price, etc, players will engage with the zone more and travel around the estates for these boons, bumping into one another and perhaps chatting, eventually making new friends.
Additionally, there currently lacks much of a point for players to go around to another player's housing and either tend to their crops, feed their chocobos, or simply engage any house that is not their own. The reason for this is that Players do not benefit from these actions in any way whatsoever. By nature the human species has a desire to not waste their own time, and while helping others is a great thing we all strive to do, if we obtain nothing for it then it is disadvantageous to spend time doing it. I would propose then that upon doing beneficial actions for other players, either by tending to or fertilizing other players crops, feeding and training their chocobo's, or perhaps in new and other unique ways, players would then obtain an amount of tokens based on the action in question (actions that require the player to use items of their own would give a higher yield of tokens). You could then create an exchange system with the NPC's of the zone for exclusive items and use these tokens used as the currency (perhaps used for all exchanges between them?).
I am aware that based on lore there is little reason for NPC's to be in these housing districts as they are designed to be used by adventurers only, but that does not mean that NPC's can't have jobs that they work there, giving the Adventurers the quality of life that is expected in that area (for instance cleaning the walk ways, tending to the grass and plant life, selling cuisine, etc). If you were to utilize this system I can assure you that players would not only enjoy it, but use it immensely.
2) While I know not the limitations of your current servers I do know that players can load vast maps and effects on their home computers. As the years advance this will only become a more and more true statement. I believe that at this point players can quite easily load the housing areas and have a large amount of RAM, Video Memory, and Processing power to spare. Add into this the fact that there is already item culling wherein once far enough away/if there are too many items at once, the furthest of them don't render any longer, which takes a load off computers as well. That is why the limit of only thirty houses per ward is somewhat crippling to a community atmosphere. A residential area in the offline world is expansive and filled with many of the same kind of house/amount of land allocated per house. While having three different sizes of house is appealing, I believe that in the current set up it actually strains the amount of players you can give housing in each ward as well as taking away from a feeling of progression with your house itself, simply paying Gil to erect the final product. The solution to this is separated into parts, but in this point I only wish to posit that there could and should be more houses, perhaps sixty to seventy-five houses per ward. If that means making a bigger and redesigned map, then so be it. Additionally, if you were to do this the need for a subdivision per ward would be eliminated, adding to the community feel as players in each ward wouldn't be separated by an unnecessary instance.
3) The second part of this then comes to the house sizes and what would happen to current residents if they were to be changed. First and foremost, the player should be buying a uniform plot of land, not a specific house/plot size, which would be separate from the size of the house they will build. I would suggest that players are given the option of what size house they'd like to build on their plot, which would also mean that they can always upgrade to a larger house later on when they have more Gil/resources. The sizes of the plots should be slightly larger than medium plots, but smaller than large plots, all being the same in price (five to ten million gil?). Players would essentially be able to choose between having a large house and small yard, medium house and medium yard, or a small house and a large yard. There would then be Gil/resource prices based on the size of the house they desire, equating to nearly the current price of houses in the end. This gives a great amount of customization to the players, customization I believe they would enjoy immensely.
4) With the previous two points in mind there would then arise the problem of the displacement of current residents. One could even call it the Housing Calamity. If in the event the team decided to change to this system or even going so far as to create the larger map, there would be a simple solution for current residents. Refund them 100% of the price they paid for the original house, then allow them to directly purchase a plot in the same ward they were in before any other purchases by non-residents can be made. This "Reclaiming" period of time could last for at least a month, perhaps two, after which the remaining new houses would go up for sale to all players. This would allow the new system to be in place while not neglecting nor upsetting the previous residents. Furthermore, it is a well known fact that fake/alt/secondary FC's and Alt characters acquire multiple the houses in the housing districts. To alleviate these issues, if you were to make the housing system tied to a player's account rather than a character of theirs, this would prevent them from purchasing multiple single player AND FC houses per character in a world server and would free up quite a few houses to other players. As for whether a plot is single player housing or FC housing, I would suggest that FC housing be an entirely separate experience.
5) You see, even though this would be an improvement on the current housing system, it still leaves many without the opportunity to purchase a home as until dynamically generating and culling wards can be introduced there would always be a shortage. That is where Ishgard would come in. There's no housing district for Ishgard because they are opposed to outsiders, perhaps less so in recent times yet still enough to not desire a flood of adventurers into their city. But what if they didn't have to? As we all know, not all that far from Ishgard are certain lands that are more unique than most. I talk of course about the Sea of Clouds and Churning Mists, where land floats within the sky. Perhaps if Ishgardeans were to stumble across a large amount of floating rock and shear it into large plot sized land, players could reside on them! Indeed, this would be beneficial to all and form the phased instance housing. Just like apartments there can be a vast amount of these houses, all independent of one another. FC's and single players alike would be able to purchase a floating slab of land to build upon in their respective sizes. You could visit the houses just like apartments to ensure that players in this "district" would be able to accumulate the benefit tokens without traveling to one of the other four housing areas. This would create a way for a vast amount of the player base who miss out on buying or being able to afford a house in other zones an opportunity to still become the proud owner of a place they can call home.
6) Finally I come to my last main point. How would players be purchasing houses? To this I only need say one word, Auctions. If houses were to run on an auctioning system it would give all players a chance to snag their favourite housing plot. It is a simple system to create would make a great deal of players extremely happy, even if only because it allows them a chance rather than having to deal with post patch login issues and losing their chance altogether. It should be noted however that as players can only own one house per world based on their account at this point, any who already own a house would be unable to place bids. Furthermore, when bidding the Gil must be deposited directly into a vault at the plot in question. When the auction is over players will be able to obtain their gil again by visiting the Vault Master(?). Ishgard and Apartments could still follow an instant purchasing model, as the amount of these available is already vast in size. If a player is outbid they would be able to either go withdraw it from the vault and bid on another house, or add more Gil to the vault and outbid their current contender. Additionally, when a house is being demolished there should be a notification option that players can opt into, either sending them a cute moogle-mail in-game, which would also be the same method that players are notified about their bids.
Overall I of course do not expect all nor any of these ideas to be implemented, but if any of you on the development team read this I would implore you to consider them and to use them in your creative process to find the ideal way in your own eyes to improve the housing in the game going forward into the years.
Happy Adventuring everyone and may Hydaelyn's light always guide you.
Housing Improvements · Post Your Ideas Here
Printable View
-
10-12-2017, 11:11 PMAyirezHousing Improvements · Post Your Ideas Here
-
10-12-2017, 11:49 PMDravlinKuraiyoru
Auctioning without a stricter limitation on ownership (as it stands one single account can potentially own 16 houses) could very easily be problematic and lend more fodder to the house flipping economy. On the other hand, auctioning plots in a scenario that sufficiently provides supply to meet the demand would be an extraneous convolution to the system.
And if house ownership were more strictly controlled, then what of those previously purchased? I don't believe punishing current home owners is a step in the right direction either. Personally, auctioning seems like a lose-lose choice to me. If the housing system is to move forward into a position that can satisfy the player base, it needs to do so in a way that doesn't disenfranchise anyone.
I'm not sure what the steps needed are, and what the best direction to take is. I can only hope that the majority of us without access to housing aren't marginalized even further, which is what I believe an auctioning system would do.
*Edit to add; I'm not sure how I feel about your other ideas. I think you bring up several interesting points, especially concerning the concept of community and its current lack-thereof. If the shortage can be overcome, this seems like the next priority for housing development; how to enrich the neighborhood aspect.
Because otherwise, persistent location community housing has zero appeal to instanced housing. I'd rather see a system that celebrates the community rather than one which enforces a deeper sense of solitude amongst the players. -
10-12-2017, 11:51 PMZStarPart 1 - Instance and Ghost housing
One solution would be this:
(Instance house/or maybe even plot housing)
Have an NPC that sells ghost plots. Meaning paying for a plot that doesn't exist in the game. So long you have the money you can just pay it.
Pros: Zero randomnesses, Zero obstructions and 100% availability so long you have the GIL.
[If instance]
Then once it is paid, you will immediately receive the plot
[If normal plot]
Then once it is paid, you wait for the next "Ghost housing implementation patch day" where Square Enix will launch those houses for people used the NPC to buy the house. That way there will be no oversupply and won't stress the server. You will get it eventually maybe wait for a month or two instead of never getting it. This will also give you (developers) time to put in plots/wards that will balance out demand/supply. Everyone will get a house, so long they can pay for it. That should be the only ceiling of getting the house.
Also, 1 house for personal and 1 for FC. This is key. -
10-12-2017, 11:51 PMZStarPart 2 - Condominium > Apartments
Change apartment to Condominium
The condominium will be a duplex type condo meaning there will be two floors and will be the size of a small house. A balcony can be purchased as an upgrade for gardening.
Put fun into getting a condo, you can add Condominium utility which everyone in that condo unit can share these utilities, these utilities would be:
1) A gym - training dummies for everyone to use
2) A SWIMMING POOL (So people can swim and stuff)
3) Workshop (Where people can use crafting station for a small fee)
4) BBQ pit! People can buy food there and be a gather spot for people to chill and meet with her condominium owners!
5) ChocoPark (Carpark) where you can park your chocobo there and do Chocobo stuff
6) Condo transport to people to Exploratory Voyages.
These will help because you will then eliminate the need for people to get their own house because they can do everything in it!~
PLUS IT IS AN INSTANCE thus helping with the server stress if any. -
10-12-2017, 11:54 PMZStarI am also against auctioning.Quote:
Originally Posted by DravlinKuraiyoru
-
10-13-2017, 12:28 AMDravlinKuraiyoruIf something similar to this were an available option instead of apartments, the housing shortage would be far less of the issue it is. Well, the numbers wouldn't change, but the feelings absolutlely would.Quote:
Originally Posted by ZStar
I think an unfortunate lack of foresight is the primary cause of the challenges this feature faces today. As it stands, there aren't any drawbacks to owning a house, where as there many with our secondary option of apartments. Without drawbacks, the choices aren't really choices, are they? They're just consolation prizes. Our current choices simply aren't comparable to a degree that merits discussion.
An "apartment 2.0" would be a welcome addition to me. -
10-13-2017, 02:00 AMAyirezQuote:
Originally Posted by DravlinKuraiyoru
The reasons you're both against auctioning are covered in my suggestions, FC's would require a minimum of 10 people to bid on a house thus getting rid of skeleton FC's that are actually another FC that bought up another house, and single players would only be able to buy a single house per world server, and maybe if we capped that to four houses total across all world servers that would also help. As for there being a surplus of housing thus making bidding unnecessary, that would never happen. Housing will always be limited aside from instanced housing like apartments, private chambers, and my suggested Ishgardian housing, and people will always want one of the houses in the community area.Quote:
Originally Posted by ZStar
The point of what happens to the current residents is also covered in my points, as I said they would get first pick for at least month before any of the houses go on sale, these people and FC's would get their Gil back and then be allowed to purchase a new one directly without an auction and they'd have time to relocate and set up again first before *any* other players that don't have a house could purchase one. So there really wouldn't be any concern about them getting the raw end of the deal.
Finally, the whole point of an Auctioning system is to give players time to not only notice that there's a house for sale, but to get the gil together and bid on it. If instead of launching Shirogane and where only those lucky enough to login without errors could buy a house, if they had an Auctioning system there would've been time for everyone to try claiming the house as theirs, it would've at the very least been fair game to all those that wanted to buy housing. If there are any negatives in an Auctioning system I do not see it, the rich will win the bids, but the rich who already own houses won't be able to bid either and there'd be even more houses meaning that it wouldn't take as much gil to purchase them in the end anyhow.
I like the condo idea though, pretty neat.
I updated my main post to be more clear about the issues you spoke of. -
10-13-2017, 02:19 AMZStarWell, what you said is true but auctioning will require a very thought out system to be effective. It could end up in last minute bidding and might even have a bidding war haha. But hey, if they disallow house owners from bidding eventually everyone will have a house (if they add more houses and cater for at least 70-80% of the player base)Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayirez
-
10-13-2017, 02:20 AMThamorian
We can keep the wards with current neighborhoods but could also make instanced housing where its just a single house of whatever size you bought with your yard, for those that don't care about being part of a neighborhood and who just want a whole house to decorate or with FC's who need a house to do stuff exclusive to owning a house. Could make them a list accessible to other players like apartments are. There are those who don't care if their house is part of a larger neighborhood. I know this is in no way an original idea and been suggested before. It's a solution I wouldn't have a problem with though.
-
10-13-2017, 02:33 AMcactusbees
One house per account. This ward belonging to two people thing is ridiculous.
In-apartment gardening? Window boxes, please? -
10-14-2017, 06:46 PMAyirez
A couple more ideas I had/want to also agree with;
1) Window Boxes (and gardening in general) are a much needed thing for, at the very least, apartments, and here is why. Small houses can have an outdoor garden which allows them to grow eight crops, medium houses have double that at sixteen, and large houses have a whopping triple at twenty-four, but wait, there's more. Inside the houses themselves you can have two, three, and four flower pots respectively, which you can still use to at least grow crops you desire (not just flowers, and obviously not for cross breeding). So this means that their actual number comes out to ten, eighteen, and twenty-six.
Now, how many crop spaces do Apartments, the only thing many of us can even purchase at the moment to call something our home, hold. Two. Only two flower pots, and nothing else, which makes it so that a great deal of players are not only stuck with small yields for their day to day gardening, but also can never cross breed. That's huge, because while a seemingly small part of the garden at first, it actually locks a load of fun and content out from the player, forcing them to either not grow crops or buy them from the market board.
Window Boxes would be a step in the right direction, as they allow even us peasants who can only obtain an apartment to still partake in this small aspect of the game. The size of the Window Box should be appropriate in relation to other houses, which means they should be either three or four crop plots. Three would be in a straight line along the window, four would be a square and slightly more compact against the window OR two separate Window Boxes with two crop plots each. This would allow for cross breeding to still take place, just in a very limited capacity. If this were to be added I and many other players would be grateful and overcome with joy.
2) Though not a necessity, especially since we have a moogle downstairs who is happy to deliver and send our letters, an in-apartment mailbox would be nice.
3) But what we really could use, and this is a general housing item altogether, is a place-able market board furnishing, so that we can conduct our merchant business from the comfort of our own homes. I'm sure I'm not the only one who wants this and I think it is well deserved, we spend a lot of time decorating our houses and chambers, but more often than not I find myself standing outside my apartment so that I can use the market board as well.
that sums up my additional ideas, will add more when I think of some, hope you all add some more too!
tl;dr read only the bold parts. -
10-15-2017, 04:02 PMBourne_EndeavorActually, it wouldn't since you can just make alts and add them into the FC. This also punishes players who prefer to have an FC with just a group of close friends and not expand beyond that point. At the moment, a friend and I make up what is essentially a two person FC yet both of us are probably more active than 100 person FCs. We're just friends outside the game and help each other out with crafting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayirez
-
10-15-2017, 04:21 PMAfydeHousing part 1
1 house & 1 fc per server is a good idea. Alts on same server cannot buy housing.
1 per account thing isn\\'t. People have spent years playing multiple servers. They should each have an option to buy a house.
Fc should be separated or have a different type of house for ranking systems. They can spend company seals for houses or make new fc currency. Do journeys to upgrade plots.
Give it an area that can do the shops since no one really uses those house skins & big markets with its own currency. Keep fc out of residential areas. Make 3 new areas for fc to be in.
keep it so private housing can do shops as well.
Make a "friends access" option. people are coming up on the land or in my house asking me to sell my home to them .I am in lavender beds. I had friends over so i opened the access. It wasn"t meant to be open for the public.
Not only are the people without housing unhappy but the people bugging the ones with housing are getting that way too. -
10-15-2017, 04:24 PMAfyde
As for the rush? Make a real estate center. People place a request one for a house, cottage, or mansion. They have 4 styles to choose from. Which is the goblet, lv beds, mist or Shiro. They can customize it to a point. They can choose plots available. If its not available, an estimated time it will be will post.
Some plots may sell out. Oh well. Not everyone can live in plot 30 or 60 in a shiro. there are others.
At least they know they will get what they want & when instead of not knowing when the next housing is coming out.
"When" is much better than ' if '
Move out fc to new areas first. Getting fc out of housing will free up a lot of plots. Let fc convert gil to the new fc currency to buy plots or transfer to fc zones temporarily. Have fc earn more new currency by opening shops and stores with items from voyages and things from the work shop.
Fc are supposed to be ready stations for battle and planning. They really shouldn't look like my rich neighbors' house should it? -
10-15-2017, 04:25 PMAfyde
Thank you for listening to us. I hope our ideas help.
-
10-15-2017, 09:21 PMAyirezFair enough, I didn't consider that. Maybe if a player's account can only join a specific FC once? That would prevent you from adding alts to the same FC and "expanding" that way.. but you and 9 other friends could still accomplish the same effect. And like you said, there are some pretty tiny FCs out there, I owned one for a year with less than 10 that dropped to just me for months lol. So indeed the minimum cap wouldn't work, or at the very least it'd hamper a lot of small FCs. Like others have said, maybe FC's should be completely instanced and the community housing should be single player only, as there is no real way to prevent alt fc's and alt characters from creating a large FC to fake it till they make it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourne_Endeavor
-
10-15-2017, 09:37 PMAyirezI agree with the one per account notion, it would indeed be unfair to essentially lock players out of owning a house on another server if they frequent between two or three, which is why I said there should be a four house cap on accounts. Any more than four I feel would be overkill though as it's pretty unlikely that someone can split their efforts between four separate characters on separate worlds in separate friend groups and still play the game to its fullest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Afyde
Again, I feel that due to the aforementioned FC sniping and alt character roundabout methods that Bourne brought up there isn't much leeway for community FC housing. I'm now under the impression that only by instancing FC housing can we fix that problem. But! I do have a small idea. Perhaps FC's could form Alliances with one another. If they did this, their instanced houses could "merge" and be side by side (In the case of my Ishgard housing idea, the two islands would be tethered to one another! would be neat). This would let you have that same community feel while preventing FC snipers from taking up all the houses in an area. On that note, if Ishgardian housing were a thing.. maybe you could spend FC currency to get FC exclusive islands? For instance, up to 3 Airship hangar islands, FC exclusive merchants, that FC wheel buff thing but better on an island, etc etc. There's a lot of potential for customization and additions if SE were to go an instanced house on a floating island honestly.
As for the second post, I think a Real Estate Center is a necessity, as not only could it let you see all available houses at once and prevent you from having to sprint out there to each one to place bids/purchase a house, but it could also send out notifications about housing that is to be demolished via moogle mail. A great idea indeed, there's no real downside to it other than players not looking at the plot in person, but I figure most people would want to do that anyhow. -
10-17-2017, 08:33 AMAyirez
One more addition that's probably been suggested before but would be great for customization; Lawn Flooring. I can't be the only one who is bored (and always have been) with the normal green grass day in and day out. While it seems that Hydaelyn doesn't experience seasons, we here on Earth all know them quite well, and so when it's Christmas and I see everyone with green as heck lawns, it strikes me as unrealistic. Now of course, there are some places in the world where Winter does have green lawns, but as I'm personally from Canada that's never been the case for me. So, rather than a seasonal change in lawn colours or anything like that, letting players choose their lawn, whether it be green grass, dirt, stone, snow, etc, would give them that feeling of home and belonging. The only foreseeable issue that I could see being brought up is that loading these floor textures would be taxing, but if they're tagged as an item they despawn just like all other items do when far away enough, leaving the default map underneath. Wouldn't cause an issue at all.
-
10-17-2017, 09:03 AMSargonius
1 house per account per server... its isnt hard....
Put a price value on an house and put max price according to x% house value...
Everyone should be able to buy an house
Why would someone own 4 plots when new comer cant get one because of selfish players that bought em all just to resell em to other people for crazy profit? -
10-17-2017, 09:12 AMWolftamerNot everyone with multiple homes buys them to flip them. Seriously, I make more money using the gardens of my 6 houses than I ever could flipping and then hunting for the next buy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sargonius
-
10-17-2017, 02:28 PMAyirezYou monster! lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Wolftamer
If what you say is true and you do own 6 houses, how did you manage that, and, how do you feel about how 5 other people can't partake in housing cause of it? I won't judge your character just on your greed alone, I'm willing to have a conversation and try to understand your side of things, it just sounds pretty absurd is all. -
10-18-2017, 10:23 PMSargonius
Thats exactly what i call greedy and selfish....
For your own profit, some people cant even have one...... -
10-18-2017, 10:57 PMAlien_Gamer
Why someone choses to have multiple houses is irrelevant. He put the work into it and bought them, therefore he gets to use them. That you don't have one is the fault of SE for not creating enough supply, not the player for buying them.
-
10-19-2017, 09:46 AMAyirezQuote:
Originally Posted by Sargonius
I can see both aspects you two bring up. Obviously I too believe that the housing market is quite absurd at the moment and that for someone to have six houses at once indeed ruins the game for at least 5 other players, or even an FC full of people. On the other hand, I also can respect the notion of working hard and earning yourself things you desire, I think everyone likes to believe that's possible both In-Game and out. However, putting the blame completely on SE is where I'd disagree. SE does deserve blame, they designed a system that can be easily abused, an oversight that they've never addressed and may not address even in the coming patches. But they do have *some* measures in place, a character can only own one personal house for a reason. Thus, by making alt characters that Wolftamer may not even intend to play, but simply add his main as a roommate and have complete control over the houses himself, he has played the system and has still taken up houses he undoubtedly knows others would love to have. Like I said before, that doesn't make him innately an awful person, he played within the limits of the system, but it's still an exploitative action that has cost multiple people an experience they should've had the chance to have.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien_Gamer
It of course rests squarely on SE's shoulders to fix this issue, and how they choose to do so (if they do at all) will be revealed in time. For now we can simply suggest things to them and their team and hope, pray even, that they take some of the good ideas and make them their own. -
10-19-2017, 10:08 AMAlien_Gamer
Alt characters can't make other alts tenants because you have to be on the friend list to do that so there is no direct control by one character for all the houses.
SE very purposefully created this game to let one character do everything at once and to allow for players to have more than one character. This effectively means, in the eyes of SE, that every Alt is a different character completely separate from every other character. Alts share nothing from achievements to items to currency to anything innately. The only workaround for this is to use an intermediary (FC chest, a separate account) to transfer things to an alt, but that is just using the system as intended because your Alt is considered no different than a character on another account.
Based on SE's design that all Alts are separate, having an Alt buy a house is not an abuse of anything nor is it an exploitation, its using the system at its designed to be used. The failure is not in how alts are handled, the failure is in the lack of housing to meet the demand. For SE to make it one house per account would run counter to some of the very fundamental concepts they used to build the game, I don't think thats going to happen...it may not actually be possible for it to happen depending on how the game is built. What is possible and what SE is willing to do is increase the number of wards, or maybe instance housing.
I also reject the notion that the game is ruined for 5 other players because of it. They're locked out of intercrossing with gardens and airships, thats it. If thats a person's main reason for playing and not having access to it is ruining their experience then I think they've got bigger problems than housing. Not having a house sucks, I won't dispute that but really, not having one is an inconvenience at worst. That said, I do honestly hope SE finds a way to give housing to everyone and all their alts. -
10-19-2017, 12:47 PMAyirezInteresting points you've made, and I am familiar with how alts don't share anything with one another innately. You are however making many assumptions in your reasoning, some of which any of us have the information for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien_Gamer
1) SE's intentions were when designing FFXIV: ARR were quite clear; to use what they had to remake the game so that it wouldn't die off. They of course added more and changed things as well, but they used the base coding from the original FFXIV. This creates what is called spaghetti code, basically code that references and uses bits from all over the place and ends up being extremely messy. This is the most likely cause of alt characters being completely separate from one another as creating a single character variable and assigning it various information is vastly easier than creating an array of character variables that each have intermingled information between one another. The limitations of technology have and always will hold us back, whether it's hardware, software, or just our own disorganization. So to say that they intended for the system to be this way isn't quite accurate, the system is the way it is most likely because it was easier to do at the time and to do quickly. But it's been over four years now, they've had time to assess things and figure stuff out, who knows if they've cleaned up the programming since.
2) While you're right, FFXIV isn't ruined for people, as there is much much more to the game than only housing, I simply meant that an aspect that they, and an enormous amount of others, wanted to partake in is blocked from them because of a single person. Whether it's right or wrong isn't for me to judge, that's SE's job. However, you say they're only locked out of crossbreeding crops and airships which is true, but you forgot a pretty important piece of the puzzle behind housing.. having a house and a home, to decorate and have fun with, to see what furniture you can collect or create, which in and of itself can create massive goals that span hours to achieve (or long). I made a rug for my apartment a couple days ago and it took me two hours to figure out where I'd have to get the mats from, and the mats of the mats, some of which I couldn't get and had to buy off the market board, and after I finally got it all together and made it I then placed it in my apartment and felt fantastic, it looks great and the size is perfect for what I wanted, thankfully. Housing is more than just a garden or airship where you can do some fancy things and earn a ton of gil. It can have emotion for people, it can be a place where friends meet up and hang around while in queue, it can be something you change up every season and show off, and overall it's something that is fun. And while it may not have been malicious and was within the system's boundaries to do, buying six houses all for ones self still prevents others from having all the fun it can bring.