Myth Caps

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mitski

NO ONE IS SUGGESTING THAT SE REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF TIME OR EFFORT REQUIRED TO OBTAIN TOMESTONES.

Please stop making irrelevant comparisons. Even if your comparison was relevant, it wouldn't be accurate because you've assumed that the only motivation to play is to acquire gear. For many players, gear is simply a means to an end.

---

The point of this thread is saying that people dont always have time to get to cap, so just it roll over right? So my question is.. why should the guy who actually had time to do it be equal to the one that didnt? typing in bold caps and underlines doesnt make it any less stupid

Another horse that hasn't beaten enough, I'd rather have Coil lockouts removed so I could play it more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hanabira

What does this have to do with anything? We all pay the same price so we should be able to progress as much as we want without being limited by other people. If i go to an all you can eat buffet, should i only be allowed to eat a small salad because thats all the skinny vegan chick ate? but we paid the same price!

---

You're missing my argument entirely. My point isn't in favor of slowing down the content with the caps, but that it would be convenient for people who can't play as often to have uncollected tomes rollover into the next week's cap. Which you still seem to be against for reasons I don't understand other than "I don't want people who don't play as often to have a decent chance of ever catching up."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Andevom

You're missing my argument entirely. My point isn't in favor of slowing down the content with the caps, but that it would be convenient for people who can't play as often to have uncollected tomes rollover into the next week's cap. Which you still seem to be against for reasons I don't understand other than "I don't want people who don't play as often to have a decent chance of ever catching up."

---

It's actually a great idea have no idea why people are against it because people still have to run the dungeons like crazy to catch up anyways.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hanabira

The point of this thread is saying that people dont always have time to get to cap, so just it roll over right? So my question is.. why should the guy who actually had time to do it be equal to the one that didn't?

---

They will only be equal if both guys do equal work. If the 2nd guy never does the work, he won't get the reward. So my question to you is... why do you think one player should receive less than another for accomplishing the same task?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bizniztyme

It's actually a great idea have no idea why people are against it because people still have to run the dungeons like crazy to catch up anyways.

---

Let me see, ok, let's be shaddy:

Buy a new copy, lvl a character to 50, let it sit there for three month. Go back, grind all carry over points, full ilvl90 AF+1 stuffs. Sell to someone on e-bay for $1,000 or more. Even paying subscription for three months, it is still a profit

On other hand, in the game, congratulation community, we got another ilvl 90 who dont know how to play.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Divinemight

Let me see, ok, let's be shaddy:

Buy a new copy, lvl a character to 50, let it sit there for three month. Go back, grind all carry over points, full ilvl90 AF+1 stuffs. Sell to someone on e-bay for $1,000 or more. Even paying subscription for three months, it is still a profit

On other hand, in the game, congratulation community, we got another ilvl 90 who dont know how to play.

---

People have suggested putting a cap on how many can roll over. Like only up to four weeks. Should probably read the entire thread. The OP's idea with a few tweaks from other posters actually makes it a pretty decent idea.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Faedden

People have suggested putting a cap on how many can roll over. Like only up to four weeks. Should probably read the entire thread. The OP's idea with a few tweaks from other posters actually makes it a pretty decent idea.

---

I read the tread, does it matter? I already said even by sitting on the account for 3 months, you can still profit. Even 6 months of subscription, i will still be profiting, the account can be sold for moree than $1,000 to lazy people. This also encourages those RMT to start laying their pawn into selling characters for money. It is more harm to the game and community.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Divinemight

I read the tread, does it matter? I already said even by sitting on the account for 3 months, you can still profit.

---

I don't love the idea, but it doesn't seem like you even read the quote you replied to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Divinemight

I read the tread, does it matter? I already said even by sitting on the account for 3 months, you can still profit. Even 6 months of subscription, i will still be profiting, the accoutn can be sold for mroe than $1,000 to lazy people.

---

The same amount of time has passed, and the same amount of effort has been put into getting the gear as someone who grinds out the 300 tomes each week. Anyone can be guilty of account selling, what evidence do you have that this would cause the practice to increase other than wild suspicion?