Request for Super Savage difficulty

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lambdafish

eureka.

---

I keep seeing this name mentioned but still have no idea what it is. I can only assume it's not referring to the emote?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Core1019

I keep seeing this name mentioned but still have no idea what it is. I can only assume it's not referring to the emote?

---

It is a piece of content being released in 4.15 that we know very little about other than it is a zone of some kind and that it is tied to relic in some way

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sylvina

There is nothing wrong with having to work to beat content. There is everything wrong with content only 1% of the playerbase can clear.

Right now Savage is clearable by an estimated 80% of the playerbase (the 80% being the players without severe mental or physical handicaps) assuming they put in the effort required. that is a good thing.

Making content only 1% of the people who actually make the effort to beat can clear, is stupid. Why would a company indulge in such unprofitable practices?

---

WoW is still a juggernaut.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lambdafish

It is clear that this is the intention for raiding, but my far bigger complaint was regarding the titles for SCOB (savage), and how that content was essentially wasted because you can just level sync and do the fight not as intended. My request is that for the super savage fight (coming out in 4.1) specifically, as this fight is clearly intended for the top end players, can we put in a restriction that this fight cannot be level synced, and that it has an ilvl cap, or at the very least have it so that this is the condition for obtaining any mounts/minions/glamour/titles that it may drop. It is too late for SCOB, but please keep super savage as something that statics can challenge throughout the games lifespan.

---

No No No No No No No No No No

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LathusWHM

No No No No No No No No No No

---

There is literally nothing wrong with OP's suggestion. What do you disagree with?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sylvina

Savage isn't content for the 1% then, and that's a good thing. If anyone who applies themselves can learn and do content, it's well designed and worthy of being made.

---

That's literally why story mode was made you ingrate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Atmora

That's literally why story mode was made you ingrate.

---

Oh, here comes the insults.

This thread is getting exciting.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Verius_Nox

Oh, here comes the insults.

This thread is getting exciting.

---

I've explained why the whole "why would you ever cater to just 1% of the playerbase" thing is stupid before and have no desire to do it again, but I do think he's an ingrate and feel like expressing that.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Atmora

That's literally why story mode was made you ingrate.

---

Not sure why they're an ingrate, just seems needlessly insulting to me

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Atmora

I've explained why the whole "why would you ever cater to just 1% of the playerbase" thing is stupid before and have no desire to do it again, but I do think he's an ingrate and feel like expressing that.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

---

Obligatory advice to edit post to avoid name calling. People have been permabanned for calling someone a nitwit. SE mods mean horrific business if one person hits report.

Also, we can add a super savage, but not sanctioned ps4 playable parsers. Because parsers cause toxicity and elitism? K.