lol failwhiteknight but ill bite. The difference here is that rifts problems effected far less people than FFXIV's currently are and for a far less time period. Seriously man how long did you play rift for anyway? The first day was the only bad one and throughout that whole time the devs were in open discussion through the forums tot he playerbase the entire time. None of that has happened here. This is far worse than rifts launch and its right up their with WoWs as far im concerned taking in to account SE had 10+ years of history and an already released MMO to learn from. Keep blindly defending though and youll get your dream of FFXIV 1.0 II.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nero
fair enough? :)
MMO Launches
Printable View
-
08-26-2013, 11:56 AMAzurus
-
08-26-2013, 11:59 AMispanoYou may wish to use the proper term, White Knight isn't the one. You also may wish to truly understand the term you should be using, because you don't seem to understand that either. I'll be one of the first to point out SE's flaws, or any other company for that matter. This is barely the second day, and I can already see the issues getting better. I won't repeat my last post, you can go read it yourself, but knowing the type you are, you will just try to label me and ignore it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Azurus
-
08-26-2013, 11:59 AMAzuruslol keep bending my point to serve your failed logic idc. fact is the problems of this launch have effected literally everybody playing to various degrees. And the game breaking bugs have effected far more people then Rifts ever did. So go on keep defending a 3 day fail obt and a severe inbalance in server distribution. the fact remains that launches have been done much better and just because some are also bad does not mean its ok to repeat past mistakes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aviva
did I quote you? I dont even remember mentioning you? care to elaborate on when I labeled you?Quote:
Originally Posted by ispano
-
08-26-2013, 12:02 PMNeroNo Idea what exactly i "white knighted", but yea lets "troll" a little.Quote:
Originally Posted by Azurus
During early Access it did affect everyone not "far less" people. You are obviously talking about Rifts actual Launch and not the Early Access. 1. ARR did not launch yet and 2. during 6 days of EA in Rift i was only able to play 12 hours tops, due 5-6 hours queue times.Quote:
Originally Posted by Azurus
Thought so.. you do not talk about Early Access from Rift, just Launch.Quote:
Originally Posted by Azurus
WoW was bugged and unstable for ~10 Month and apparently i was not aware that ARR is running allready that long...Quote:
Originally Posted by Azurus
did i do it right? enough with the trolling and actually i did not defend the problems of ARR's early access. But yeah.. see what you want to see. :) -
08-26-2013, 12:03 PMAdathain
SWTOR, Rift and Age of Conan. Out of those AoC was the worst for me as I believe out of the 36hr head start we were supposed to get the first 18-24 it wasn't playable, but after that it seemed fine. With Rift and swtor the worst part for me were the wait times but at least the queue system worked in those games so you had a rough idea of when you would on.
It's sad too because after the debacle that was FF14 1.0 you would think at this point they would be desperate to make sure things went as smoothly as possible, especially when the early access folks are probably the ones most likely to stick around and play the game. -
08-26-2013, 12:04 PMChinoMorenoWell I can't argue with reason, but I feel a three day test a week before early access just isn't enough to justify anything. You'd think they'd want to check some stress. 1.0 open beta lasted longer as did the EA. I would have thought they'd go above and beyond given 1.0's history.Quote:
Originally Posted by ispano
-
08-26-2013, 12:04 PMispanoMay wish to re-read my post. I said "you will" not that you had. However, you have already done it to others, so I knew you would try to pull it on anyone who has knowledge of how these things work. You'll just say they blindly defend without being rational or logical.Quote:
Originally Posted by Azurus
-
08-26-2013, 12:07 PMKayo
Like Ive said before, EA is a bonus. Im definitely disappointed I couldnt spend the weekend playing but oh well... they have until launch (which seems to be the 29th now).
That said, theyre really screwing it up. Honestly ive heard launch horror stories before but Ive personally never experience something as bad. Maybe ive just been lucky but I havent had a horrible launch since LotRO. Sure ... ive had horrible lag, some crashes, insanely large queues, maybe even some quick maintenance here and there ... but the game being downright unplayable at all for this long? Not since LotRO and even then it wasnt as bad. LotRO had major rubberbanding issues happening within 10 minutes but at least it wasnt everyone.
AoC
Aion - worse were the incredibly long queues from the "AFK personal shop" cheat.
WAR
Champions Online
SWTOR
Guild Wars 2 -
08-26-2013, 12:15 PMAlhanelemUncomparable. WoW already had plenty of capacity at the time because they knew how many players they had and how many players could possibly be attracted back with an expansion. In other words, they both already had the infrastructure and already knew how much they needed, because the game was ALREADY RUNNING and they had YEARS OF DATA DIRECTLY FROM THEIR GAME to go on.Quote:
not really true considering the amount of people who would come back for WoW expansion launches often outnumbered those who would show up on launch days of new MMOs.
|An new expansion != an MMO launch. If you want to bring up WoW, it has to be WoW's original launch, not an expansion.
Where Y is a much greater number than X:Quote:
And as we know, there were no congestion related bugs in beta 4 preventing logins
It doesn't matter how long phase 4 is. Having X people on your servers during phase 4 does not help you alliviate problems that occur when Y people are on the servers afterward.
Its like if you build a stadium that's just big enough for a brand new (american) football team before it's proven itself, and then you don't have eneough seats for everyone when their popularity explodes after winning their first few games. Now you have to make the stadium (server) bigger to accommodate the larger number of fans (logins). But you couldn't have known until after it happened that you would need that many. Yes, you can use region population data to make an educated guess, but that's just it- a guess. -
08-26-2013, 12:18 PMAzurusohhhh nonono i dont see much wrong with the points you raise, so dont assume, you know what they say about assuming. I throw the label around for people who think it is ok to have an EA like this "because wow was bad" or some other mmo was bad. I waited for this game to come around for 3 years so im plenty invested and to watch SE piss away their rare chance at a second impression is quite disappointing.Quote:
Originally Posted by ispano
And it is even more disappointing to see people patting them on the back like there isnt so much in this industry to learn from. fact remains that far more people are pissed than pleased this EA and that does not bode well for this game as history has shown so many times. This is why I find it infuriating when people use the same tired excuses, cause honestly there has not been a truely "successful" MMO, to use that term loosely since WoW.
Every MMO after has had varying degrees of "success" but there are far more failures and the ones that enjoyed some "success", ended up going f2p in 6 months and found that their success was fleeting at best. Maybe I am being a tad irrational but you know what? watching the same dismal scene of a potentially great game commit suicide is getting really old after 10 years. So I am sorry If i hurt your or anyone else's feelings but this industry has a way of bringing out the worst in people...