3.2 PvP: Feast Game Mode Discussion Thread.

Is it just me or did it get worse for healers after the update? I feel like WARs deal more damage? NINs and MCNs can finish me literally in 2 seconds.. I used to heal much better while it was more susceptible to interrupts (before the update).

The damage increase for DPS (and possibly WAR?) is too high for heals to catch up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Februs

You know, it's funny but some of the most successful matches I've ever had are the ones in which I play Paladin in a completely offensive manner as well. Most people have a full blown panic attack when they see a Pld running anything other than a steady stream of Shield Bashes.

I do agree that both Drk and War should get a slight offensive boost though, to make up for what they that lack in defensive. In my opinion, War's are essentially working as they should. Some of the most horrifying groups to play against are ones with War's, especially if they've got a Nin running as Dps. Drk's, on the other hand, are falling behind. Personally, I'd still like to see Tar Pit turned into an area denial that binds/heavies as well as DoT's the player who stands in it. .

---

I bet, Paladins have a very overlooked burst, I just meant that their PVP abilities are more in tune with Protecting the healers/range but once those are blown, I see no reason not to jump into the frontlines and take a opponent out; they have the HP/ CDs to handle it. My post was more about DRK being brought up to Warriors utility/Offense than anything, I agree with tar pit needing a boost, I'd love to see it as the anti-Sacred Prism, a 4 second bind, a dot tick, and if we're wishing here, a 10% damage taken debuff for any opponents within the aoe, the Heavy moved to Carnal Chill. Changes like that might make me lvl a DRK xD.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Neuflune

. If they're poking one job's CC, they should poke similar CC in other jobs. Otherwise they should leave it alone and just adjust potencies/ticks if the problem was burst DPS.

---

More or less, especially in relation to the interrupt changes, the CCs that come from a BLM/WHM is far too powerful to leave alone, espesically when the counterlay to that is either stun lock (which leaves only paladin to be the reliable one) silence (scarcely available in the game) or having two dps stay on them the entire time to push that damage threshold (where it's essentially meta defining, esp with a WHM/BLM combo). My point is that bind isn;t any less detrimental than sleep, and adjustments to CC duration is needed in general if they're doing away with their weaknesses (which are typically associated with cast times or a relatively long cooldown)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Iagainsti

I bet, Paladins have a very overlooked burst...

---

Even then, a paladin really would not be solo killing anyone unless the other healer was extremely bad. They have to choose between dpsing or using a stun (that isn't their PvP skill) due to shield bash being a weaponskill. It's overlooked, but it's not anything to write home about either, unless you're a nocturnal AST.

Of course, DRK has a very short lived burst that's easily exhausted by their mana pool, on top of having very few influential skills compared to the other two tanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jubei

Is it just me or did it get worse for healers after the update? I feel like WARs deal more damage? NINs and MCNs can finish me literally in 2 seconds.. I used to heal much better while it was more susceptible to interrupts (before the update).

The damage increase for DPS (and possibly WAR?) is too high for heals to catch up.

---

Going to chalk it up to random crits. Most people don't realize the explosive gameplay during DPS-buff time is intended and healers aren't meant to keep everyone alive forever HPS-wise. Also a lot of DPS not understanding the match-up against other DPS (like MCH+DRG should be outbursting MNK+BLM so you don't fight them head-on). If any DPS gets lucky, especially the already bursty ones (and WAR as a result, too), you'll eat streak crits and there's nothing you can do about it.

That said, I find the difference between non-crit and high-crit a bit too ludicrous and abilities like Between The Eyes really shouldn't crit for how much damage they already do and how easy they are to pull off (just like how Barrage>Empyreal doesn't crit).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RiceisNice

Even then, a paladin really would not be solo killing anyone unless the other healer was extremely bad. They have to choose between dpsing or using a stun (that isn't their PvP skill) due to shield bash being a weaponskill. It's overlooked, but it's not anything to write home about either, unless you're a nocturnal AST. Of course, DRK has a very short lived burst that's easily exhausted by their mana pool, on top of having very few influential skills compared to the other two tanks.

---

Not necessarily. Iagainsti is correct that Pld burst is quite overlooked. I solo other players as Pld all the time. It's very doable provided you have your full burst available.

The problem is that Pld's have to actively choose if using their full burst is worth it, because several of the abilities used in their full burst rotation have double utility. Spirit's Within, for example, can be used as part of the Pld burst or saved for silencing the Healer/Caster. Further, as you said, they can't maintain that burst while keeping the target locked down, like War's can; so, again, they have a choice to make between one or the other. All in all, though, they have do have the Dps to solo down a target, especially squishy ones like ranged players, if they're using their kit properly. By themselves, they'll never outpace direct heals (though, the same could be said for almost any other job in the game), but they can definitely solo targets, including the healer. They just have to be aware that if they chose to fight like this then they are ignoring half their support and defensive utility in favour of Dps. In Feast, that's an unwise decision (unless you happen to have a stellar team), but in FL or 8 vs 8 there's really no reason for a Pld not to be scoring kills.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RiceisNice

Even then, a paladin really would not be solo killing anyone unless the other healer was extremely bad..

---

I have personally seen a Paladin drop Divine Veil, pop FoF, and drop a monk from 100-0 before a healer could do anything, granted he had 6 medal stacks, but that's just good strat on the Pally's part.

Checked the combat log after the match, FoF, Combo'd into Royal Authority and weaved in FS, GS, and SW with the coup de grace Mercy Stroke. Well played Tortuga imo.

Ideally for SMN I'd like for it to get Tri-disaster to be restored to 12 sec bind. And I find the nerf to their skills inadequate, the complaining has always been "the SMN burst happens too fast and is too easy to execute", which was answered with a senseless nerf to Painflare, Energey Drain and Deathflare. Like, have you ever seen the burst of a DRG, a MCH or a BRD? All 3 have pretty much (when played by people who actually know how to play these) a burst which is not only even more potent but, for DRG, even longer. The only advantage of the SMN burst being that it could be executed every 60 sec (if not halted by a MNK...). Now I dislike being paired with SMNs in 4vs 4 because I find their killing capabilities unreliable. The solution to their burst was imo to simply extend the pvp cooldown of Tri-Disaster to say, 90 sec and give a shared 3-5 sec GCD to all Aetherflow skills (while respecting the normal CD of each). This would have put SMN on a fairer burst page.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Iagainsti

I have personally seen a Paladin drop Divine Veil, pop FoF, and drop a monk from 100-0 before a healer could do anything, granted he had 6 medal stacks, but that's just good strat on the Pally's part.

Checked the combat log after the match, FoF, Combo'd into Royal Authority and weaved in FS, GS, and SW with the coup de grace Mercy Stroke. Well played Tortuga imo.

---

That's 6 stacks though, you're literally looking at a 90% damage taken penalty and I'd be surprised if that monk could survive any form of burst from a non-healer, especially if full swing was factored into that (though I'm not sure if you meant he did it before or after RA). I get what you're trying to point out, but I don't feel thats a good example of how capable a paladin burst is; again my point is that it's not particularly anything to write home about when talking relatively, especially when they can't do both stuns and burst combos through RA at the same time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Iagainsti

Hence, the "granted" in my original post. I'm not looking to debate, I'm just saying Paladins can and have a 7.5 second burst when the situation unfolds, and no one expects it when it drops you. That poor Monk didn't see it coming.

---

Well, I mean if you're at 6 stacks as a dps, you should be expecting to drop like a brick regardless of who the attacker is (excluding healers). Tank or not, tank stance or not, you'd have to be expecting some serious damage coming your way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NoelNoel

the complaining has always been "the SMN burst happens too fast and is too easy to execute", which was answered with a senseless nerf to Painflare, Energey Drain and Deathflare.

---

More accurately, it was a lot of damage relative to what was needed behind it and the weaknesses behind it. For BRd/MCH, they were cast times as well as a ranged penalty. For melee, it's the equviliant of sticking their hands in a blender. For BLM, they have no burst on the go. SMN has none of this, on top of a lower effective cooldown.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NoelNoel

Like, have you ever seen the burst of a DRG, a MCH or a BRD? All 3 have pretty much (when played by people who actually know how to play these) a burst which is not only even more potent but, for DRG, even longer.

---

The bolded statement really has no meaning when you're talking class balance. And even then, in the hands of a capable SMN can still be just as powerful, if not moreso than those job's because of the AoE damage (which is an utter nightmare for nocturnal AST)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NoelNoel

The only advantage of the SMN burst being that it could be executed every 60 sec (if not halted by a MNK...).

---

They also have CCs that are independent of aetherflow or being in melee range. Tri-bind is was a very powerful lockdown and no one would realistically waste purify on it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NoelNoel

Now I dislike being paired with SMNs in 4vs 4 because I find their killing capabilities unreliable. The solution to their burst was imo to simply extend the pvp cooldown of Tri-Disaster to say, 90 sec and give a shared 3-5 sec GCD to all Aetherflow skills (while respecting the normal CD of each). This would have put SMN on a fairer burst page.

---

That's actually worse of a nerf to SMN than what they got now, I'm not sure on your intentions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RiceisNice

That's 6 stacks though, you're literally looking at a 90% damage taken penalty and I'd be surprised if that monk could survive any form of burst from a non-healer.

---

Hence, the "granted" in my original post. I'm not looking to debate, I'm just saying Paladins can and have a 7.5 second burst when the situation unfolds, and no one expects it when it drops you. That poor Monk didn't see it coming.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RiceisNice

That's actually worse of a nerf to SMN than what they got now, I'm not sure on your intentions.

---

In all regards it would be better. The SMN burst is basically tri > fester > painflare > ED > deathflare, now that 3 of the skills in the combo have been significantly nerfed, how can you fail to see that restoring the potency and simply having the burst take a few more seconds to fully execute (and thus a few more sceonds for the enemy to react, since people complained about not being able to react fast enough against a SMN burst) would be better for dps...? That's not even counting on the fact Focalization negates another chunk of that burst. The only issue I see with my suggestion is that it also gives more time to a MNK to stop said burst. If the possible MNK actually wants to attack a SMN with def buff. If I had to play SMN again curently I would probably skip ED and try to simply deal a more steady damage amount because the old burst won't work so well anymore.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RiceisNice

Tri-bind is was a very powerful lockdown and no one would realistically waste purify on it

---

You just assume that as ranged. As melee I purify a 12 sec bind if I see my healer can't help me simply because the next one will only be 6 sec and that SMNs hardly spend their time doing a bind lock.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RiceisNice

The bolded statement really has no meaning when you're talking class balance. And even then, in the hands of a capable SMN can still be just as powerful, if not moreso than those job's because of the AoE damage (which is an utter nightmare for nocturnal AST)

---

That I won't deny, but the noct AST VS SMN is another issue. Let's not forget most of them never even bother using Focalization or Collective Unconscious. Hell, most of them think they can just spam Aspected Benefic and save a whole party with just that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RiceisNice

More accurately, it was a lot of damage relative to what was needed behind it and the weaknesses behind it. For BRd/MCH, they were cast times as well as a ranged penalty. For melee, it's the equviliant of sticking their hands in a blender. For BLM, they have no burst on the go. SMN has none of this, on top of a lower effective cooldown.

---

Never felt like I was putting my hands in a blender when attacking a SMN as melee... Hell, as DRG even if the SMN has def buff and focuses on me I have enough time to wreck them (if they don't get healed of course). The only issue was/is when a SMN and someone else focuses on you, but that can be said of any DPS duo who does that. SMN needs little skill to perform well DPS wise, what I'm saying is that the changes they got were mostly inadequate, imo.