If you want to view a Reddit page that answers your question, you can always try the cache. In the ... menu next to a Google link, a lot of the time they have a cached version of the page from the pre-blackout days.
Printable View
If you want to view a Reddit page that answers your question, you can always try the cache. In the ... menu next to a Google link, a lot of the time they have a cached version of the page from the pre-blackout days.
Excep you are also making a decision for others. You aren't giving them the option to boycott be closing a sub reddit that affects reddit income and has a chance of forcing changes.
You as a consumer want to force other consumers to abide by your will.
And you said you don't even use the site, so why do you even care?
So if we found out SE was severely underpaying their GM team but were still within a legal threshold. In other words, they were being incredibly cheap but not doing anything illegal, and the GM team decided to go on strike. You'd side with SE in this hypothetical? After all, a full GM strike would be a massive inconvenience for the majority of users while only benefiting a small minority moderation team.
Reddit's CEO is playing on this exact mindset that the masses won't care that actually managing and moderating reddit will become significantly worse because they just want to poke around on the website. It isn't selfish whatsoever. The mod teams are essentially unpaid workers and are trying to protest a change which makes their job harder for no benefit to anyone else, users included, but to make a rich man richer.
These aren't paid positions, they are volunteer positions. Collective bargaining for employees has nothing to do with volunteer moderating an internet forum. They can decide not to volunteer and move on.
Edit: In general though yes I would side with SE. Those GMs knew the hourly wage offered when they accepted employment. The marketplace solution if a request for a raise is denied is to find a higher paying job and leave, and if SE thought they had enough value they could counter. If the pay was vastly under market they'd probably also have a hard time keeping the role filled.
I thought reddit had started booting mods and opening subs? I thought I saw one that was reopened a mod posted "We were told if not open today we would be replaced."
People being jerks to you aside: I suppose we could always start a competing FFXIV subreddit. That would likely have the official one open up immediately. Something we've seen the last couple of weeks, if people hadn't already seen it, is the FFXIV Reddit and the Discord are run by petty tyrants drunk on power.
Right now, they're lording over people and abusing that power.
But if they saw a credible rival rising, they'd fear that they will lose their monopoly on FFXIV discussion forum power and probably instantly reopen the Reddit to prevent a competitor from cutting in and making them obsolete.
EDIT:
He is kinda right about this, though:
When you're fighting the good fight, you can't start by alienating the people you need on your side to win it. Make your movement toxic enough, and it will be easy for "the powers that be" to put it down, as they'll have the support of the general public in doing so. It's why terrorism and such seldom works, since unless people already REALLY hate the people in power to the point they're willing to die to depose them anyway, they don't support things that actively harm themselves to do so. It's why there's a limit to how long strikes can go on, not just from the business/employer side, but also the employee side, as eventually the customers, who you need on your side to effect changes, will start to ignore the strike lines if they become too onerous to their lives.
It is true that you have to confront power sometimes, and those in power don't tend to just change because they're asked, but if you're actively alienating other people, then they're more likely to reflexively take the side of those in power. Especially if the topic isn't something of universal good and evil and is rather something arcane and technical. Most people don't know what API tools are, much less any of the nuance around the conversation. They just see a bunch of mods have heavy handed shut down discussion and are getting salty the longer it lasts.
What you see:
"I laughed at you like a stereotypical schoolyard bully mocking peers who use too many words in their sentences. I have proven my superiority to you by implying derision of your ideas. If I imply that you are inferior to me, I do not have to actually address anything that you say."
What I see:
"I have verified that I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about by immediately backing off from a discussion and fleeing with my tail tucked between my legs, since I am incapable of responding with any actual substance. To preserve my fragile ego, I will attempt to make the other person seem stupid for contradicting me."
This is what happens when you try to get your everything from a single source.
wikis
teamcraft
data dump and timer tracking sites
in-game chat
god forbid, here
Even if you insist on a reddit-like format, a bunch of options like lemmy, kbin, mastadon, and squabbles are all hitting the gas and ramping up operations in light of this drama.
The Reddit moderators are not the ones who came up with guides, tips, and discussions that were used to help the community. The players did. It's just that some of those discussions happen to be on Reddit, which isn't a website that the moderators own or created themselves, so I don't see your point. Even though I don't think a WoWhead-style website will ever come to this game because it's too old now, I would definitely donate to help get that started since it's what this game desperately needs.
There's always this talk about the protest accomplishing anything via hurting reddit's pocket book but it's like you forget the bottom line. In this specific situation this is unnecessary. Given time reddit as a company is going to suffer from the consequences of its actions here. You can just sit back and wait for it to happen.
Why are you so determined to be antagonistic? Do the subreddit moderators feel the need to throw their weight around that much?
It's also pretty ironic that you're sitting here discussing how people's impatience with the reddit blackout is going to cause the internet to enter into an age of corporate-controlled dystopia, when the reality is most people are willing to let nature take its course with reddit and move on. You're the one that's like it's going to be the end of the world, so you're more likely to be addicted to it than the people you're calling out. You just can't handle the thought of the old status quo changing. Most of us will adapt once it's all over, which is why you're the one acting like it's a life or death fight, when it really isn't.
Best case people will just flock to other sites we all know and cherish. Doubt Reddit will change much. Let it go broke. But the status quo will probably continue.
I sent a message to the mods and got an auto reply back that they will open on June 19th after which they will conduct a vote on whether the blackout should continue. Imo, it's very selfish to hold other people's content hostage. The art, the guides, the conversations and advice that were posted there belong to the people who posted them and not the mods. For the mods to hold all that content hostage, which was neither produced nor belongs to them, without the explicit permission of the posters is not right regardless of the cause.
If posters want to remove or self-censor their content from reddit, that would be one thing, but blocking access to other posters' content is completely wrong and immoral.
Whatever will you do without the ART and the content of reddit ? oh my god, I wonder how people live their every day life without REDDIT, it's like blood going through your veins, you need it to be able to go on in life
The ART !!!! The ART !!!! My catgirl pictures !!! It's IMMORAL !!
The unofficial ff14 discord mods being a bunch of power trippers who abuse their power while letting their friends bully and break their own rules? I'm shocked!
It's the principle of the matter. Reddit's API changes are overblown. Don't like the app or website? Just stop going there, or go there less often. But taking control of people's content without their permission is wrong.
Also, it's funny that you talk as if the people against blackouts are the ones that use reddit the most, when in fact they're the ones that use it the least because they couldn't care less about API changes and 3rd party apps.
It isn't a moderator's job to come up with content; it is to moderate – delete spam and rule-breaking content so what remains is the useful on-topic stuff that people want to see.
I can't say I fully understand the current issues myself, but apparently the changes are going to make it more difficult to keep on top of the amount of spam coming in.
I don't know who the mods are and I can't read their minds, but I find it hard to believe that every moderator on every subreddit is suddenly delighting in keeping people out of the information they have worked hard to keep organised.
r/AskHistorians had a lovely write-up here with a follow-up here. I'm neither a prolific contributor nor reader, so I don't pretend to have experience with Reddit-particular quirks. To summarize what has been presented, however:
1. Effective moderation, especially of larger subreddits, relies on a wide range of tools that rely on the API and are unavailable via Reddit. Identifying posts that violate the rules, automating functionality, and moderating while away from a desktop all would be made far more difficult or impossible with the changes at the current price point. In Reddit's own app, moderators cannot see which posts have been reported by users as requiring moderation, cannot see removed posts by their peers for review (and revert, if required), cannot see what actions are required. Moderation becomes limited to when a moderator happens to be physically sitting at their desk instead of being able to receive automatic notification and pop in whenever and wherever an issue arises.
2. Any user with visual impairments cannot use the Reddit mobile app well or at all. This one is particularly close to home to me due to working with programs for the disabled for some time in college, and it's thus one that sticks out to me. Reddit hasn't cared about accessibility in the last nine years, presumably because they haven't been large enough of a user base to be monetizeable and turn a profit. This is a gap currently filled only by third-party apps, and it is a gap that will be forced open again when those apps are removed. Supposedly, Reddit has promised they will review accessibility features in the future, but...
3. Reddit has regularly made promises of new features to replace much of what is being destroyed, but is closing off free access to the API in advance of these new features. They have been offered compromises such as a phased implementation as replacement Reddit alternatives become available; these compromises have been rejected by Reddit. They've promised new moderator features that have yet to materialize in the last eight years, requested to combat hate speech and disinformation as well as ordinary ToS violations. They've rolled back promises about features implemented as "opt-in" that were later made required. It seems a decade of broken promises has created an air of mistrust that would make compromise difficult even if both sides were amenable.
From what I've seen, it appears that this is a pretty big straw, but it's the last in a larger pile that's been building for some time.
10 characters outside HB tags
I believe the motivation is much more about forcibly-drawing attention to the issue, and attempting to wield "grassroots" power to try to effect change via defiance.
Indeed, Reddit is quite skilled at hurting its own pocketbook; it does not need much assistance in that endeavor. And it would take much longer than days or weeks to effect any serious revenue consequences, as people would need to stop participating in addictive and compulsive Reddit microtransactions (they will not), and advertisers would need to be convinced to pull out (which usually takes more than a brief firestorm, assuming it's not something that renders a property instantly-radioactive, like antisemitic statements).
I suspect that most involved are well-aware of that.
There is no proof of this. It is also a perplexing attitude which seems to suggest that complacency and capitulation is the path to victory, because of something like, "everything will just work out if you relax, and the bad actors will inevitably receive karmic punishment"... which I think most of history demonstrates to the contrary.
In fact, the opposite is likely to occur — people know this, and so they are attempting to apply the pressure necessary to force change while they feel that they still can, and in a situation where they suspect that complacency will otherwise prevail... as it has on, for example, Twitter.
I cannot parse much meaning from this question. To the best of my perception, no one is "determined to be antagonistic".
A series of steps and negotiations were taken to attempt to resolve this situation over the course of many long months, if not years. Most of these actions were invisible to the greater public because they took place as private negotiations between app creators, moderators, and the Reddit administration.
As the deadline to the change approached, Reddit's previously ambiguous — or even outright-misleading — comments and assurances slowly began to sharpen more clearly into the opposite of what people wanted to hear. It seems reasonable to assume that this occurred because Reddit's owners and operators knew that being too honest about their plans, too soon, would prove disadvantageous to their long-term goals.
When it finally became clear — very shortly before deadline — that the negotiations and discussions were largely a farce, those poised to be negatively affected by it scrambled to organise a different response, now that "peaceful resolution" seemed to have been taken off the table.
This is very similar to what occurs when talks break down between a business and its unionised workers, and the pattern was similar: rather than a sudden eruption of arbitrary psychopathy, what you are witnessing is instead the result of prolonged behind-doors negotiations finally spilling into public attention once it became clear that further discussion would not produce results satisfactory nor acceptable to both affected parties.
This also seems like a mischaracterisation — to assume that moderators attempting to preserve their ability to function and maintain the environments that they passionately care about are merely 'showing off' or 'throwing their power around'.
It seems obvious to me that such an idea is an oversimplification, based on the simple fact that such blackouts rarely ever occur. If moderators were interested in demonstrating petty power, they would regularly perform such stunts — especially given the general community fascination with insulting and antagonising Reddit moderators.
Instead, when subreddits have been hijacked or suddenly shut down in the past, the community has usually successfully-rallied to overthrow and oust one particular bad actor, and then return back to a normal state in the hands of new moderators that once again attempt to serve the needs of the community.
Furthermore, the moderators gain no specific personal benefit from this protest, and stand to gain nearly no personal compensation even if Reddit is forced to capitulate on the changes; they are essentially fighting for nothing other than the hope of preserving their access to tools that allow them to do their work on the site.
You are essentially complaining that unpaid volunteers are demonstrably upset that their ability to do their unpaid volunteer work is about to become significantly more onerous, and twisting it into a mischaracterisation of them as some sort of petty feudal warlords that are flexing power out of a simple joy in cruelty (or something).
In fact, it is ironic that a suspicious majority of the subreddits that did not partake in the blackouts are connected to a small cadre of moderators who are known to staff sometimes hundreds of the most popular subreddits and act with a will that somewhat resembles a mafia, and likely have personal reasons for quietly enabling Reddit's corporate actions.
In which case, one could say that the moderators who are doing what you personally want are also "throwing their weight around" — but in a direction that you personally approve of.
This is mischaracterised. I implied that it was symptomatic of a general trend in human behavior that will likely end at such an endpoint, and is in fact rapidly-accelerating towards it with each passing year.
I still believe that is correct, although attributing it to any single specific incident or example would, indeed, be an oversimplification — like most historical outcomes.
On what evidence do you base this claim?
It seems far more likely to me that most people are focused on the here-and-now only, and so long as the faucet of content scroll continues to entertain them, they will happily behave like a benumbed version of the "This Is Fine" Dog.
This is a mischaracterisation and exaggeration. At no point did I imply any eschatological consequences to Reddit becoming an even more corporatised and user-unfriendly dark-pattern data-gathering advertising-controlled hell-hole.
All I asserted was that it was another brick paving the road for a lower-quality user experience for essentially everyone on the Internet, as more and more companies begin to grow more and more aggressive in their control and monetisation tactics, even if it may not seem immediately obvious in the moment.
This is a mischaracterisation. My contact with Reddit each day is limited, and I find such systems to generally be a poor use of time that insidiously saps mental productivity away from more concretely-enriching tasks and activities.
Clearly, at the least, I am not reliant enough upon Reddit to feel compelled to make threads on the FFXIV General Forum begging people to begin brainstorming strikebreaking methods.
The "blackout" has been, at most, mildly inconvenient to me, but since I've simply shifted where I spend those 10-15 minutes per day, I feel no significant overall loss, and no significant overall concern about the potential duration of the protest.
Nonetheless, the situation is still an emblematic example of the threats and issues facing modern-day users, customers, and consumers as tensions between corporate goals and individual usability and freedoms continue to heat up, so I have taken an interest in its details.
This is both an ad hominem and a mischaracterisation.
Firstly, the preexisting "status quo" at Reddit was already relatively low-quality and in constant decline, so to suggest that I have an investment in it is misleading.
Secondly, my concern is not with whether or not a given "status quo" changes; it is with the specific changes occurring, and the specific consequences that will result from that.
You are flatly-incorrect in attempting to characterise my response as being born merely from "resistance to change", and you are also obscuring the concerns at play by trying to characterise the situation as merely "the status quo is changing" — a statement which, in and of itself, contains as much information and meaning as a handful of air.
For example, if the microstate of Malta somehow became an invincible nuclear superpower and conquered the world tomorrow, and it was thereafter decreed that all other citizens of Earth were now the property and slaves of Malta, this would by definition be a significant change to "the status quo".
However, to reduce your probable objections to that situation as "not being able to handle the status quo changing" would fail to properly-acknowledge the actual reasons that you might be concerned about it.
I cannot speak for others, but I have never intended to characterise the dramatic decline in quality and usability of a single social media site as "a life or death fight".
However, I also believe in the seemingly-obvious nuance that a topic does not have to involve literal physiological survival in order to be worth discussing, arguing about, and — if deemed necessary and appropriate — fighting for.
Frankly, the fact that you use hyperbolic speech such as "adapting once it's all over", as if you are enduring an ecological collapse of some sort, itself seems curiously-exaggerated; the most likely outcome of the entire situation, in the short-term, is that the protest will be broken by a corporation with far more power, time, money, and influence than any volunteers, and everyone will rubberband back to upvoting pictures of Y'shtola smoking in a thong, and purge from their minds the traumatic dark times when Reddit didn't work for a few weeks.
I could, in turn, suggest that you yourself stop considering it "a life or death matter" that you can't browse a subreddit for a few weeks while some people far more invested in the situation than you (ie, the moderation teams of Reddit) are attempting to preserve not just what has become a hobby and a minor way-of-life for them, but also the quality of the experience for everyone else who uses the content that they keep clean and moderated.
In the short term, you can see only that you are being inconvenienced — not that it's an attempt to prevent worse consequences in the longer term.
That you state on one hand that "everyone's ready to move on", and on the other seem so agitated about being locked out of a subreddit, suggests that your assertions may be inaccurate.
Ultimately, I suppose it's simply a fundamental difference in philosophy here — some people think that if a fight doesn't immediately seem to favor you, then you should just roll over and let it happen. Other people think that standing your ground, even if the odds are against you, is worth it — for any number of reasons, which can vary from individual to individual.
The blackouts are based on the latter principle, and have nothing to do with "petty power" or "throwing tantrums" or whatever common and misleading characterisations are being effectively-used to turn public sentiment against protesters.
Wow. I came to the forum wondering if I could find out why information regarding the game has been blocked off regarding Reddit when you google something you don't understand about the game, and I'm seeing the reason why. Some very juvenile responses to this post.
Go call the cops on them.
From what I've seen, the community was polled ahead of this and a large majority chose in favor of going dark. There should be a poll up at some point today where you have the opportunity to vote for staying closed longer or opening back up. If anyone's looking for island sanctuary updates, look up the Overseas Casuals discord. It's the same group that put out the reddit threads for the IS workshop, so you can get your daily workshop schedule set or check out the fortuneteller recommendations if you just want to visit once a week.
I will honestly admit that I've been a whole lot more productive and less stressed in the last week since I haven't been on Reddit arguing with strangers.
Y'all are welcome to join the Tumblr XIV community in the meantime. We're weirdos, and we aren't attached to Google search at the hip like Reddit, but we're friendly.
It's looking rather obvious there'll be no budging, so if the subs going dark want to do more than piss into the wind they're going to have to nut up and take concrete action. That means immediately going scorched earth on their subs, leaving behind nothing but some links to alternate communities on other services. Anything else, is nothing but reddit waiting out the clock and forgetting this hiccup a week later. Sure, the site will probably do a rollback, but this way at least there's an attempt to jumpstart the exodus. All we're seeing right now is an "I can fix her" arc, as she passes out while smoking crack in the bathroom and sets the house on fire.
https://medium.com/yardcouch-com/the...s-cb0da61aca56Quote:
Keep in mind that it all started with the CEO being greedy and effectively shutting down third party readers.
Reddit mods will ban anyone they want for any reason they want, then mute you for protesting the ban, no accountability, no one to answer to..in recent years reddit has gained a reputation as the direct antithesis of free speech. The mods need a reality check. They do not own and did not create the content they are locking off for others. I hope they all get removed.Quote:
. They also banned anyone who spoke out against this censorship. Mods became power-hungry dictators, erasing anyone who dared to challenge them.
Reddit is losing money
Quote:
It’s hard to anticipate the total amount of money Reddit will save and earn after implementing charges for high-usage, third-party apps. But Huffman says the “pure infrastructure costs” of supporting these apps costs Reddit about $10 million each year.
Companies or organisations that cant pay for themselves usually wind up closed.Quote:
Experts also pointed to the significance of Reddit showing a way to charge AI companies that have historically used Reddit data at no cost to develop large-scale and for-profit AI models.
Have never needed to go to Reddit for anything. Take a break, do something else.