Originally Posted by
Iscah
While you've put a lot of thought into this and it all sounds reasonable, I have to be mean and blunt here.
You seem to be putting yourself forward as moderator, and I don't feel like it's a good idea.
Maybe I'm overreacting, but it gives me a bad gut feeling.
You know you have controversial views compared to many of the posters here. You seem to think you're "free of bias", yet so many arguments come from what others perceive as your bias in the opposite direction, and it feels to me like the least pleasant parts of forum discussions happen when you stick to an idea regardless of everyone else disagreeing with you - and then you say "let's agree to disagree".
Saying that doesn't automatically make someone fair and balanced. It can be used to just shut down a debate when they don't want to change their position.
As a general principle, it doesn't seem right to put someone with controversial, opposite-to-mainstream views about a subject in charge of the debate about that subject.
Moderators aren't quite the same thing as directing the course of discussion, but I feel like they need to be impartial, not pushing a strong opinion one way or the other.