http://i43.tinypic.com/2u57520.jpg
Printable View
What you could do is have someone else make the same dish as you and if theirs tastes good and yours doesn't then that means you didn't cook it properly to fit your preference. Which based on your preferences you make the dish poorly compared to the other person. SE presents numbers in their videos poorly in comparison to the actual release of the patch. So yes, my logic is valid.
LMAO
Ok, yea I'm done. The fact that you consider a rep response like that to be informative coupled with your inability to comprehend the difference between reasonable doubt and assumption has made me lose any modicum of confidence I had in your intellectual ability.
By all means, proceed to humiliate yourself :D
How is it circular? I didn't agree with you throwing out the dish. I simply gave an example for you to know when not to make certain dishes and when to let someone else make the dish for you. In this case I compared to the preview video to the patch. The preview video always translates poorly to the patch. The good smell of food does not always translate to poor tasting food. You're example was pretty poor to begin with, but it looks like I made it work in my favor.
Also I can say from your example don't throw away the dish whether it smells good or bad, just don't complain until you actually try it!
/thread
If it will alleviate OPs concerns, I see no problem with it. The only reason you people keep saying you are done, yet don't leave, and keep trying to insult me is because you can't argue what I'm saying. Go right ahead. It doesn't hurt my feelings and I also don't see where I'm embarrassing myself at all. Though throwing out random insults, which by the way is an admission of defeat in debate, is highly respectable and the sign of a true scholar. Yes?
It's circular because you are relying on the proposition that all SE videos, past or future, do not accurately represent damage (or whatever). You assume that that point is proven, which it can never be, and then use that to base your argument on. That is the very definition of circular logic.