Originally Posted by
Risvertasashi
So the question is, then, how do we decide priority?
If you're going to say "FCs because members"... well what about people paying newbies to join up into an FC with them so they can buy a house? So then, should we up the minimum member count to something like 50+ active and separate service accounts, just to ensure proper utilization of large properties?
Of course, the same people that are complaining would probably still complain, since their FCs are probably not very big....
And if it's a small FC the argument doesn't work, because tenants+friends list access gives similar (and perhaps in cases greater) shared utilization.