RIP Aurum Vale

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kahnom

Solo and Unsynced eh ?
I'll go stone vigil hm with my mnk,Can't wait to fight 2 last boss by myself.

---

You can already do this. If your party wipes, or they just sit out. So long as you evade all the skills you can easily solo. I use to do it pretty frequently on WAR, and people were like omg your LEET. I'm like um I'm just dodging its no big deal. L2Dodge.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Twilite

Pretty sure the mobs are of the aggro types that will aggro anyway.

---

Aggro-able mobs do not aggro on something more than 10 levels higher than them, usually. So this is why I assume that they will nullify this aspect in the unsynced dungeons.

...so we can do a lv15 dungeon as a lv50 - ilvl130? lol...

Isnt that game breaking and far to easy?
I mean.. those new players wont learn how to play there class effektive.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Adire

If you go into ARR content with fewer than the required amount of people, yes, you will be unsynced.

Edit: Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/ffxiv/comme...iew_at_nantes/

Edit again: It actually only says level sync, but hopefully they'll unsync ilvl too. If not, it'll still be fun to wreck the wretched place with level 50 abilities.

---

BEST NEWS IVE HEARD ABOUT HEAVENSWARD

caps

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AsahinaMyLove

...so we can do a lv15 dungeon as a lv50 - ilvl130? lol...

Isnt that game breaking and far to easy?
I mean.. those new players wont learn how to play there class effektive.

---

Somehow I don't think that's going to apply to say lv15-38.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AsahinaMyLove

...so we can do a lv15 dungeon as a lv50 - ilvl130? lol...

Isnt that game breaking and far to easy?
I mean.. those new players wont learn how to play there class effektive.

---

Does not know how the system works?

You will still be syncing if you queue by any of the methods avalible today. You only unsync if you intentionally queue with at least one lessnmember than the standard amount, with the intent of running the dungeon in a non standard manner.
It does not affect queuing in like normal or duty roulettes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CGMidlander

If you go into AV solo, you'll probably still get your butt handed to you unless you're a healer or SMN. lol

Stuff just hits way too hard in this game.

---

Thats what my R15 Healer / attacker Chocobo is for If he can't heal me through that, then I'll be having a bucket o wings for dinner tonight :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AsahinaMyLove

...so we can do a lv15 dungeon as a lv50 - ilvl130? lol..

---

If you queue with less than the required amount for it in 3.0, you can do that level 15 dungeon at level 60 with Ilvl 180.

If I read the translation right, this will go for raids and trials, too.

I'm actually kinda sad that they will be doing this. Sure it sounds kidna cool at first, but ....I think its pretty disappointing for the game. Just my opinion.

Pretty soon the whole game will be soloable. /INB4 solo coils

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VoltaAsura

/INB4 solo coils

---

People are already beating T13 with 6 people...Imagine when we are level 60 and have 180+ item levels.

I hope we get Aurum Vale Hard. Hell, I hope we get Aurum Vale Extreme. I really like that place in a Brayflox "Oh, we have large rooms we can wander around in instead of following linear paths" kind of way.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NovaLevossida

I hope we get Aurum Vale Hard. Hell, I hope we get Aurum Vale Extreme. I really like that place in a Brayflox "Oh, we have large rooms we can wander around in instead of following linear paths" kind of way.

---

Unfortunately they more than likely won't do this - a dev have commented on this in the past before. Any dungeon from 1.0 will not get a hard mode in 2.0/3.0. Has something to do with the dungeon layout?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VoltaAsura

Unfortunately they more than likely won't do this - a dev have commented on this in the past before. Any dungeon from 1.0 will not get a hard mode in 2.0/3.0. Has something to do with the dungeon layout?

---

Thats too bad. DD looks like it has a lot more to it. Some areas that looked far more interesting than the original.

Q: What was the reasoning behind implementing Wanderers' Palace (Hard) and Amdapor Keep (Hard) over hard versions of, say, Dzemael Darkhold and the Aurum Vale?


A: When we were making FFXIV: ARR we redesigned the regulations for making dungeons to account for the new battle system and cameras; however, this didn't apply to dungeons designed for 1.0. As the FFXIV: ARR storyline would connect to the story from 1.0, we shortened these 1.0 dungeons as much as possible and made adjustments to fit the regulations of FFXIV: ARR, which is what you see with Dzemael Darkhold and the Aurum Vale. However, there are limitations to what we can do, and in the event that we wanted to add a hard mode, it would require roughly the same amount of resources as creating a brand-new dungeon. For this reason, we do not have any plans to make hard modes for the dungeons originally designed for 1.0.

http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...rd#post2718786

Hm. I don't have any issues with particular dungeons, but RIP fate-leveling if I can solo a level 15 dungeon at level 30.