Originally Posted by
O-Deka-K
I work with random numbers all the time. I have to read reports on random numbers and determine if they follow given percentages "correctly" or not. That being said, 100 samples is not even close to being a significant sample size. At an 83% success rate, I would not be surprised at all if you get 65 successes or 95 successes. If you want to compare 81% to 83% for accuracy, then I'd say that you would need over ten thousand samples (each), and that's still on the low side. I'm completely serious. And no, I don't expect anyone to do this.
The deviation is greater than you think, and yes, it annoys me too.