Do you want Wyverns fighting alongside your dragoon?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hollow

I'm pleased to see that after that giant post, someone has undestood absolutely nothing. I expected it.
I wasn't talking about stats, damage etc.; I was talking about charisma and uniqueness ... things actual DRG completely lacks.
An armor nobody will use and a Jump attack in a lore without dragon enemies ... this things should make DRG a good DD choice when SAM or DRK will be implemented?
DRG has always be one of my fav classes with THF, Gambler and BLU ... but in this game is miles away from a good, characterized class.

---

A lore without dragon enemies? You must have missed the entire Dragoon questline then...
And in that case, you may show yourself out of the thread now.

Oh yeah, smart players don't use AF aside from WHM pieces because most of it sucks ass and is easily replaced by melded gear, GC, or especially DL gear.
More that shows you have no clue what you're talking about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Yucie

A lore without dragon enemies? You must have missed the entire Dragoon questline then...
And in that case, you may show yourself out of the thread now.

Oh yeah, smart players don't use AF aside from WHM pieces because most of it sucks ass and is easily replaced by melded gear, GC, or especially DL gear.
More that shows you have no clue what you're talking about.

---

Are you a complete @#@#? This is the last time I'll try to explain something so simple ...

I said, the armor alone can't bring uniqueness to the class since nobody use it ... and the job itself has poor, characterized abilities and the strongest WS seems a SAM WS ...

Plus ... the Dragoon questline? With who I'm I talking about these things? So should I feel comfortable about DRG role since in his quest dragons exist? (They aren't even dragons in the first place, they're wyverns ...)
There are no dragons actually in this world ... there are cyclops, marlboro, ants, iron golems, buffaloes ... but not a single dragon.

Now, since in the new gameplay videos they're showing us a dragon, I think they've understood this fact ... still, I'd like to see if DRG will be more effective against them, compared to other DDs ... if not, well .... ù_ù

well you can have a chocobo to your side *eek*...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mizukage

each wyvern will have a different job:

---

All I see are three dragon-like critters. One attacks with electricity, one with poison and the last with acid. The mighty Chocobo laughs at them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hollow

Are you a complete @#@#? This is the last time I'll try to explain something so simple ...

I said, the armor alone can't bring uniqueness to the class since nobody use it ... and the job itself has poor, characterized abilities and the strongest WS seems a SAM WS ...

Plus ... the Dragoon questline? With who I'm I talking about these things? So should I feel comfortable about DRG role since in his quest dragons exist? (They aren't even dragons in the first place, they're wyverns ...)
There are no dragons actually in this world ... there are cyclops, marlboro, ants, iron golems, buffaloes ... but not a single dragon.

Now, since in the new gameplay videos they're showing us a dragon, I think they've understood this fact ... still, I'd like to see if DRG will be more effective against them, compared to other DDs ... if not, well .... ù_ù

---

I do agree with you about Dragoon should be a more Dragon Killer knight. Anything to make them shine against Dragon kinds is a plus, but; Yucie has a valid point about the Dragoon Quest line.

There are also Drakes found in numerous places. Don't get me wrong, a Drake is a term used to describe (particular types of) dragon or similar draconic creatures, in this case a Drake is a wingless dragon.. Another argument you bring up is your opinion about Chaos Thrust. Chaos Thrust is actually a Lancer ability and all we might know is that Lancer might be a class needed to unlock Samurai, but this is speculation.

i would rather Dragoon be wanted to beat dragons because the style of play fits fighting dragons rather than some dragon specific buff then it becomes a wasted trait etc for anything but dragons.

Yes please to wyvern familiar.

It's the only reason I don't play dragoon in this game, I liked the wyvern pet alot.

That and the purple armor. I don't like the darknight look they have.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Antanias

No times infinity.

---

I noticed I hadn't responded to this thread.

Then I read the second post in this thread and realized I didn't have to after reading the content and amount of likes it garnered.

I'll make sure to put a green arrow on it though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ramsey

Gareth and Kain are the only two "traditional" Dragoons to appear in the main series, they define the archetype, and they both fit it. On top of that though, Freya and Kihmari both fit the archetype on most counts as well. And none of them have constant companion wyverns or dragons.

---

This. I wish Hyrist was here so he could post his old signature. A picture of Kain with the caption "I didn't need a wyvern to become the symbol for all Dragoons. Why do you?".

Don't bog down Dragoons a second time just because of a pet, please.