First you claimed you didn't ask the requirement to cut in half, then asked the alex requirement to be 1/3 of it is now, some logic lol.
You asked the requirement to cut MORE THAN HALF basically, it's the longest requirement for the majority.
This is incorrect, I've been asking mythic NOT to change requirement BEFORE I have one. Even if I never want to work for one, I still don't want it to change. I don't just create a character with Mythic in inv at lv 1, there's a pretty long period of time I have no Mythic too, and I'm perfectly fine with not being 1% if I don't work for it.
As stated before, everyone have their own opinion toward what makes the game more fun. IMO, MMORPG with social hierarchy is more interesting than MMORPG without. Even if I ended up on the lower end of hierarchy, I'd still play a game with social hierarchy and just be happy to be on the lower end. Whether I'm 1% of player or 99% of player, the game is still more interesting with hard to obtain epic items. I picked FFXI as my main MMORPG, because having social hierarchy made the game interesting to me. If I want a game without epic item, I'd just play other games.
I see nothing "selfish" about asking FFXI to be FFXI, a game I loved. Why'd I pop on a forum and ask dev to change FFXI into another game I don't like? It does not hurt anyone's benefit by asking dev to keep this game the way it is because I liked how it was. If you don't like what makes FFXI FFXI, play FFXIV.
What are you talking about, lol. COR has empy, and current weapon that's on top isn't legendary. Whoever goes through the entire process of making a Mythic for a COR do it for a COR. RNG with no access isn't relevant. You said you want every job to have reasonable goal to pursue, which I fully agree on, and it's been my main point entire time. But cutting mythic requirement by half does not provide a reasonable goal, it devalues the goal. If you really care about certain job needs a reasonable goal, you should ask the dev to make 4th legendary with same requirement as relic, not devalue current goal.
I didn't assume you don't know the requirement, and idc whether you're making 3 mythic or 90 mythics and what you've gone through while making them, it's irrelevant to the topic.
It's not I ignored half of what you have said, it's you simply don't agree with my POV and vice versa. Fine. I said my opinion about Mythic, if you can't accept it, then so be it.
Oh and btw:
Loled at this, majority of mythic's is as worthless as afterglow, and afterglow isn't complete zero improvement, just the improvement is small and requirement is above what majority of people can afford. By logic you'd want to ask afterglow requirement to reduce too. It makes no sense that you're ok with current afterglow requirement(900M for extra crit-rate after WS for entire pt), but not ok with current Mythic requirement (300~400M for what? -na more often or 60% more QD dmg in WKR or something similar) They're on same tier of worthlessness.
It seems to me that you want mythic requirement to reduce because you want yourself or your friend a mythic, less about what makes better game. Thus you can make above statement that makes zero sense....not ok with mythic because you want one, but ok with afterglow and just ask whoever want to be elite make afterglow because you don't want one.
I'm ok with afterglow, I want it, it's still improvement, hell probably more improvement than my Mythic, but I can't afford it, thus I'm not 1%. But I don't really care that I don't have it and would never ask dev to lower the requirement to suit my need, unlike you.


Reply With Quote