I'm trying to understand a lot of the things said by the reps in this thread, but there is a chain of logic I simply cannot follow. From what I've read, it sounds like they think DRK is too powerful because of desperate blows:
So they're going to nerf desperate blows while boosting last resort by exactly the same amount so... no nerf is really accomplished:This is a topic that has been discussed in several threads, particularly one about dark knight being too powerful. As was commented during VanaFest, we feel dark knight is becoming powerful
But this makes it so that DRK becomes a new viable option for a SJ:•Current
•Desperate Blows +25%
•Post-adjustment
•Desperate Blows +10% (*Value with 5 merit points)
•Last Resort +15%
But since this change will have no effect on one-handers:Simply put, this adjustment will allow you to gain this effect in the case you use dark knight as your support job.
Then all of this is moot. There is only one job that seriously gains from using drk as a SJ, and that's samurai. Samurai is still a better SJ than drk because hasso can be on full time so you never lose the haste, plus the various TP benefits and seigan if stuff takes a turn for the worse. So forgive my ignorance if this is not the case, but this whole chain of logic looks like it is designed only to give SAM the ability to reach the same amount of JA haste that DRK can reach. And even then, it still probably won't be used over /war or /dnc.
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making it so there's more SJ diversity! And this change might just be one step towards making drk a more viable SJ with other changes on the horizon. But the whole reason people sub sam is it gives them massive boosts if they use a 2h weapon. Don't you think there should be SJ options that give you almost comparable boosts regardless of how many hands you use to hold your weapon? Also, I think it would be better to start with the jobs that people almost never sub (like cor, brd, pup, rng, drg, blu, bst, smn, mnk), not one that people situationally sub like drk.


Reply With Quote






