Dark Knight Fixes, Ever going to happen?

[Crimson_Slasher]

Agreed with Dart. I personally get a lot of use from scarlet dilerium, and frankly, even if i didnt get much use for it in my regular daily drk use, id rather have a bad JA with very situational use than no ja at all, because lets face it, everyone knows if we got NOTHING that level cap update, everyone would whine about that. "WAAAAAH why does <job> get a new trait and we get nothing?!".

With that said id still like to see some fixes yes, but im certainly not going to look at someone offering me a raw steak instead of cooked, slap it from their hands and start a scene, i am going to either take it home and make it into something i CAN use, or im going to politely decline. Im a grumpy melee rdm, but i can say personally, i am glad to have that JA.

[Creelo]

Well okay, so here it is, the big question.


I see you posted about horns and regen, mechanical toys.


Or is SE content with the broken state we are in?

If by "horns" you mean the Gjallarhorn thread I started, I'll let you know (or remind you, w/e), that the dev team really didn't say jack shit about actually giving Gjallarhorn a buff it deserves in Camate's post, just that it would be further enhanced through ToM trials. Too bad we all already expected that Gjallarhorn (along with every other Relic/Mythic/Empy) would be enhanced through ToM eventually again. X.x

The actual post...

While I can't give the specifics just yet, there is no need to worry as you will be able to enhance your Gjallarhorn further via Trial of the Magians. This goes for other relic weapons as well.

I will pass your enhancement ideas on to the development team so they can consider them as well^^

[Urteil]

Thunder III incoming, the wait to 99 was worth it!



I wish Camate would come in here and tell us that they sincerely don't care, I'd like for the final nail to be slammed into the coffin.


There has been little no dev response in the DRK thread ever.

[Hextitan]

They did. They said they'll revamp old two-hours before this thread was created, and which is what this thread is about.

Uh....no it's not. 2 hours were mentioned later but the thread itself is about DRK in general.

Did you start reading the thread on page 3 or something? I don't see how anyone could read the beginning of the thread and think "this is supposed to be about 2 hours specifically".

[Cljader1]

They did. They said they'll revamp old two-hours before this thread was created, and which is what this thread is about.

Not sure if he does read.

[Arcon]

Did you start reading the thread on page 3 or something? I don't see how anyone could read the beginning of the thread and think "this is supposed to be about 2 hours specifically".

Touche. It only became about BW on page 2, although it was mentioned in the first reply. There was at least one other thread in which people were bitching about it, which is why I asked what was so bad about it. Right now Urteil is still bitching about absolutely everything and Cljader1 is just trying to hold on to the last bits and pieces of his dignity. I'm still waiting for an honest response. Sorry if I helped derail this thread, although honestly, I don't see how it could have ended up any other way, with or without the BW discussion.

Not sure if he does read.

You were the first person to mention BW in this thread, in your first post on on the first page as the first reply. Maybe that's where I got the idea from? Looks like I'm reading for the both of us, professor. If you wanna bitch about me, point out my mistakes, like Hextitan did, then I might admit to it. Otherwise it just makes you look even more retarded. Yes, even more.

[Cljader1]

Touche. It only became about BW on page 2, although it was mentioned in the first reply. There was at least one other thread in which people were bitching about it, which is why I asked what was so bad about it. Right now Urteil is still bitching about absolutely everything and Cljader1 is just trying to hold on to the last bits and pieces of his dignity. I'm still waiting for an honest response. Sorry if I helped derail this thread, although honestly, I don't see how it could have ended up any other way, with or without the BW discussion.



You were the first person to mention BW in this thread, in your first post on on the first page as the first reply. Maybe that's where I got the idea from? Looks like I'm reading for the both of us, professor. If you wanna bitch about me, point out my mistakes, like Hextitan did, then I might admit to it. Otherwise it just makes you look even more retarded. Yes, even more.

Oh my this idiot cant read, I listed about several spells and abilities in my first post..this thread is about dark knight fixes...GTFO the drk thread!

[Arcon]

Oh my this idiot cant read, I listed about several spells and abilities in my first post..this thread is about dark knight fixes...GTFO the drk thread!

Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, "Rain Man", look retarded, act retarded, not retarded. Count toothpicks to your cards. Autistic, sure. Not retarded. You know Tom Hanks, "Forrest Gump". Slow, yes. Retarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain't retarded. Peter Sellers, "Being There". Infantile, yes. Retarded, no. You went full retard, man. Never go full retard.

[Urteil]

Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, "Rain Man", look retarded, act retarded, not retarded. Count toothpicks to your cards. Autistic, sure. Not retarded. You know Tom Hanks, "Forrest Gump". Slow, yes. Retarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain't retarded. Peter Sellers, "Being There". Infantile, yes. Retarded, no. You went full retard, man. Never go full retard.

I posted, just to say that I +1'd your post.

[Cljader1]

Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, "Rain Man", look retarded, act retarded, not retarded. Count toothpicks to your cards. Autistic, sure. Not retarded. You know Tom Hanks, "Forrest Gump". Slow, yes. Retarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won a ping-pong competition. That ain't retarded. Peter Sellers, "Being There". Infantile, yes. Retarded, no. You went full retard, man. Never go full retard.

Enough of your derails, learn how to read my post before my name come crawling out your mouth