While we're Trading spells....

[Supersun]

Cirein-croin?

[Greatguardian]

Bubbly Bernie?

[Supersun]

I thought he was immune

[Greatguardian]

Is he really?

[Supersun]

Wouldn't surprise me

[Urteil]

Since WHM is getting Addle in return for us getting Raise II,
and PLD got Phalanx without giving us anything,
Why not give us Enlight and Endark. DRKs don't need anything in return :P

================
F u.

[Covenant]

On the subject of enspells 2. How about increasing the secondary nature of the spells, to be MaB for magic spell of the same element. For example, rather tha. Simply lowering resistance, it allowed redmages and opportunity to magic crit a spell of the same element. So swing enthunder 2 on quadavs makes sense...allow thunder to crit. Rather than doing something to earth damage.

Enspell 3 sounds like fun, but I think most people would want a minimum of 50-100 pt damage per swing, easily making RDM over powered. Your talking about an additonal 1k~5k of damage for the cost of 100mp or so...if that.

On the subject of enlighten and endark. I'm in all favor for it...as well as allowing tier 2 of those spells.

[Supersun]

Your talking about an additonal 1k~5k of damage for the cost of 100mp or so...if that.

You know Wars can do that much like every 10 secs for 0 MP.

It'd certainly be possible to make enspells hit for 100 per swing and still be balanced, there would just have to be some less then favorable restrictions.

[Kristal]

No need for Enspell III. I think Enspell II would be more desirable if SE gave it normal enspell damage on additional hits.