Haste and You... A guide to the misinformed.

[Naturebeckles]

Just fyi, <stpt> and <stal> will allow you to target a blinking christmas tree, without any problems, even without blinkmenot.

I've never seen <stal>, so i'm going to have to try that and see how it works. And I'm serious about that since you're the only person who hasn't talked to me like I'm a complete idiot.

[rog]

I've never seen <stal>, so i'm going to have to try that and see how it works. And I'm serious about that since you're the only person who hasn't talked to me like I'm a complete idiot.

At least not in this thread.

[Naturebeckles]

At least not in this thread.

Well, right. That's what I meant.

[Greatguardian]

I've never seen <stal>, so i'm going to have to try that and see how it works. And I'm serious about that since you're the only person who hasn't talked to me like I'm a complete idiot.

<stpt> will create a blue arrow on your party list, allowing you to choose members for the target of a spell by scrolling up and down the party list itself with the arrow keys, starting at the person whom you were originally targetting.

<stal> is the same thing, but allows the arrow to move up and down into the entire Alliance list rather than being confined to your party.

Neither of these are affected by blinking, because you are not targeting a player. You are targeting their name on your party list. They were added in a patch a few years ago, and I've recommended them to every mage I've met since then. Unfortunately, most people are just too lazy to switch, and that does make them bad mages.

[Cream_Soda]

I've never seen <stal>, so i'm going to have to try that and see how it works. And I'm serious about that since you're the only person who hasn't talked to me like I'm a complete idiot.

yes you have

I've mentioned it more than once prior to his post and other people have mentioned it as well.

Unless you're just a huge selective reader.

[rog]

Unless you're just a huge selective reader.

That would seem to be the case.

Well, right. That's what I meant.

It's ok, because i was definitely thinking it when i made the post.

[Naturebeckles]

yes you have

I've mentioned it more than once prior to his post and other people have mentioned it as well.

Unless you're just a huge selective reader.

I meant before this thread and I largely ignore you because just like to hear yourself talk.