Post Screenshots of your Warrior

[Leonlionheart]

All of those arguments were posted before most augments were known, other than Adaberk.

Obviously with Crit damage heca +1 hands, it would be better.

STR+4 earring is better, yes.

I'm not big on gil, that's why I don't have anything better than Spiral. And lazy. And don't play anymore.

Obviously now that Rancor Collar is known, it's better.

Congratulations on having a Mars ring, N sash, and Armada hauberk, I don't have them so I can't test.

Attack on my set from body/ring/belt/earring = 30 (including skill from AF3+2 body)
Attack on your set from body/ring/belt/earring = 34
Your set has 2% more DA and 4 more attack, at the cost of 2% less Set Proc rate(set proc isn't really a big deal). The difference in gil is, nearly 40mil. Not to mention however many millions spent on tatters.

Your set will more than likely win, assuming you do indeed have that 6 STP and 3% DA.

With 4~5 STP and 2% DA my argument against it stands though so you need perfect augs and NEED an HQ(not easy to get).

Shoot for your set, but my set is definitely the next best option.

If you want to hear me say it, then yes: I agree with you. You're set is completely optimal as far as I can tell. (I still don't think I'll recommend AV items to people though)