Dipper doesn't just have TH. She has ALL the thf Job Abilities...
and i don't even think you know what circumstantial evidence means. Been watching too many cop drama's, might need to wiki that term.
The fact that pets have jobs is easily tested.
Some job traits are not as obvious as others, but even the subtle ones can be inferred. And the blatantly obvious ones are concretely testable.
Gilfinder for instance. Or Crit damage bonus.
AND even if all these things were "circumstantial evidence" it still wouldn't matter. The very nature of circumstantial evidence is that it does not stand alone. But that does not make it worthless. Circumstantial evidence is often compiled in law to form "Corroborating evidence" which can be solidly used to reach an accurate conclusion.
And for your next statement. "Only if the player has their main job set as thf."
You are merely stating the way things work now. Thats hardly a reason to keep them the way they are now.
And also the way things are now does not concretely imply SE's intent. Its possible SE never considered this issue because dipper is a monster and monsters like a kindred thf dont get climbing TH. It could alredy be set up that way in the code. We know the game mechanics work differently for players than they do for monsters. And until recently pets were treated as monsters not players (this has been a blurred line lately where pets are starting to get the worst of both worlds).
Anyway, This forum exists so players can feed input to the developers. Dipper is a thf and i feel should get the true full strength Treasure hunter of a thf. And as such i have made this thread to point out this discrepancy to the Dev team.
I am really not interested in why YOU think they didn't. (i doubt anyone is interested) It's off topic and pointless. If you don't like the idea, then JUST SAY "i dont like it" AND if u actually have a reason why you don't like it, then SAY THE REASON.
Example: "i think it would take away from thfs feeling special"
Then we can actually have a conversation about the points of contention you bring up. However babbling out circular logic like "Its obvious SE nvr intended for it to work that way because it doesnt work that way" is annoying.

Reply With Quote


ipper_Yuly