Please remove the option to close own threads.

[Raxiaz]

Where did I say I denied being hypocritical? Point that part out to me, please.

And pointing out that you were ignorant of it doesn't change the fact that you are ignorant of it and shouldn't have made a comment on something that you know little to nothing about, just your own experiences with both users. It would have avoided this whole debate.

The way you worded it is clearly provoking the user and you are thus "trolling." It doesn't matter how you view it on the Internet, it matters how others view it.

[Karbuncle]

Where did I say I denied being hypocritical? Point that part out to me, please.

Teehee! I was hoping you'd ask that

You are interpreting it wrong.

Right here ^^! I read this as you Implying my assumption on your hypocrisy was wrong. IF you did not deny being hypocritical I fail to see why you would tell me that interpreting your post as "Flame bait", hence "uncalled for" was "Interpreting it wrong", Implying it was not Flame Bait/Uncalled For, hence you werent being hypocritical.

Am i reading too far into it? I bet its the excuse I'll get. But i dont think i am.

And pointing out that you were ignorant of it doesn't change the fact that you are ignorant of it and shouldn't have made a comment on something that you know little to nothing about, just your own experiences with both users. It would have avoided this whole debate.

I'm sorry? I commented on the facts i had at hand. 1) Korpg psots, 2) Katz Blocks him for quoting/responding to him. I'm filled in enough on what i saw to type what i did. While i am ignorant to the preamble to this, It does not change the fact that from the facts i had at my disposal, It looked for all intents and purposes Katz blocked Korpg for Quoting/Responding to him. An Absurd act in my eyes.

The way you worded it is clearly provoking the user and you are thus "trolling." It doesn't matter how you view it on the Internet, it matters how others view it.

I call bubcus, See this is the exact reason why users should not be able to lock threads. I had no intentions on "flamming" him or "Trolling" him. My intention was to point out the absurdity of blocking someone for responding to them.

Do my methods leave room for improvement? Yah, I don't deny this one bit. Looking back i honestly believe i could have acted better. However, Even if i went back and changed it my actions have already happened and what i did can not be taken back. So no matter how much i want to go back and change it, I can't. I'm stuck with the choices i made. Its a sad truth, no amount of regret will change it.

So no, My intents weren't trolling in any way, Only to maybe point out to him that his actions were absurd/extreme and he shouldn't block someone for responding to him.

Edit: In Honor of Kens post, I will end the argument here. Rax get your last post it and I promise I won't respond on this anymore. I admitted to my wrongs, and he's right. We're talking in circles. I know what i did wrong and i could have gone about it differently, But i honestly feel nothing would have changed.

I'd be called a troll no matter how i said it, because again, People don't understand the difference between trolling, and disagreeing, or pointing out absurd actions. To them its all the same.

[Raxiaz]

Teehee! I was hoping you'd ask that



Right here ^^! I read this as you Implying my assumption on your hypocrisy was wrong. IF you did not deny being hypocritical I fail to see why you would tell me that interpreting your post as "Flame bait", hence "uncalled for" was "Interpreting it wrong", Implying it was not Flame Bait/Uncalled For, hence you werent being hypocritical.

Am i reading too far into it? I bet its the excuse I'll get. But i dont think i am.



I'm sorry? I commented on the facts i had at hand. 1) Korpg psots, 2) Katz Blocks him for quoting/responding to him. I'm filled in enough on what i saw to type what i did. While i am ignorant to the preamble to this, It does not change the fact that from the facts i had at my disposal, It looked for all intents and purposes Katz blocked Korpg for Quoting/Responding to him. An Absurd act in my eyes.




I call bubcus, See this is the exact reason why users should not be able to lock threads. I had no intentions on "flamming" him or "Trolling" him. My intention was to point out the absurdity of blocking someone for responding to them.

Do my methods leave room for improvement? Yah, I don't deny this one bit. Looking back i honestly believe i could have acted better. However, Even if i went back and changed it my actions have already happened and what i did can not be taken back. So no matter how much i want to go back and change it, I can't. I'm stuck with the choices i made. Its a sad truth, no amount of regret will change it.

So no, My intents weren't trolling in any way, Only to maybe point out to him that his actions were absurd/extreme and he shouldn't block someone for responding to him.

Edit: In Honor of Kens post, I will end the argument here. Rax get your last post it and I promise I won't respond on this anymore. I admitted to my wrongs, and he's right. We're talking in circles. I know what i did wrong and i could have gone about it differently, But i honestly feel nothing would have changed.

I'd be called a troll no matter how i said it, because again, People don't understand the difference between trolling, and disagreeing, or pointing out absurd actions. To them its all the same.

LIKE'd. Yeah, I LIKE'd a post going against me.

"You are interpreting it wrong." was a statement on your interpretations of Korpg's/Kat's relation to each other. I did not intend for that to be a statement on your interpretations of my posts.