Cultural Lotting Changes, now with no risk of being closed

[Korpg]

Im not against linkshell distribution as the bolder underlined statement shows. I just dont operate it.

It wasn't the bolded underlined, it was the second bolded statement.

Still a statement of slander.

[katz]

as you have all said you all signed up to the linkshell leaders rules. so the linkshell leaders should have the rights to do what they want, people will just leave if its a bad shell

Clarified for the purpose of making you understand it better.

create malicious insinuations towards another. And you think by asking this isnt insinuation

[katz]

I dont care to continue this line of thread. Subject closed.

[Korpg]

as you have all said you all signed up to the linkshell leaders rules. so the linkshell leaders should have the rights to do what they want, people will just leave if its a bad shell

Clarified for the purpose of making you understand it better.

Logic:

1. As we all said means We = everyone but you. You do not agree with our methods, so you are excluded from the group of we. There are 2 groups now, we and you. You are one who is excluded from we, and we are everyone but you.

2. We accepted linkshell leaders rules, meaning everyone but you excepted linkshell leaders rule.

3. Linkshell rules is not SE ToS.

4. We who accepted linkshell leaders rules means we accepted an alternative set of rules.

5. You do not accept linkshell leaders rules, therefore you don't accept alternative set of rules.

6. People who steal from linkshells did so by not obeying alternative set of rules. Therefore, they have accepted linkshell rules before.

7. People who steal are bad.

8. You have never accepted linkshell rules, so you have never stole before. Therefore you are not bad.

9. People who have accepted linkshell rules and stolen from linkshells are not you, since you never accepted linkshell rules.

10. Since you are not we, we have accepted rules, and we have stolen (by this logic) then that must mean we are bad, since we are not you, and there are only two groups of people. You never stole because you never accepted rules, so therefore we have stolen, and there are only two groups of people; we and you, we are bad because we have stolen from linkshells.

You just called everyone bad by logic. Slander!

[Korpg]

create malicious insinuations towards another. And you think by asking this isnt insinuation

Malicious: a form of lie used to defame or slander another.

Since I did not lie by logic, I did not create malicious insinuations towards anyone.

[Korpg]

I dont care to continue this line of thread. Subject closed.

See you tomorrow.

[katz]

Logic:

1. As we all said means We = everyone but you. You do not agree with our methods, so you are excluded from the group of we. There are 2 groups now, we and you. You are one who is excluded from we, and we are everyone but you.
TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT AGAIN!!!!!!!!This doesnt mean I dont agree it means I never signed up to those linkshells who set up rules.
2. We accepted linkshell leaders rules, meaning everyone but you excepted linkshell leaders rule.
I ACCEPT LINKSHELL RULES APPLY AND HAVE EVEN PREVIOUSLY STATED I FOLLOW PARTY LEADER RULES.

3. Linkshell rules is not SE ToS. AND I HAVE STATED THEY CAN SET RULES AND PUBLISH THEM

4. We who accepted linkshell leaders rules means we accepted an alternative set of rules.

5. You do not accept linkshell leaders rules, therefore you don't accept alternative set of rules. MADE UP THAT I DONT ACCEPT LINKSHELL LEADER RULES BECAUSE I DO ACCEPT THEM

6. People who steal from linkshells did so by not obeying alternative set of rules. Therefore, they have accepted linkshell rules before.

7. People who steal are bad.

8. You have never accepted linkshell rules, so you have never stole before. Therefore you are not bad. WTF

9. People who have accepted linkshell rules and stolen from linkshells are not you, since you never accepted linkshell rules.

10. Since you are not we, we have accepted rules, and we have stolen (by this logic) then that must mean we are bad, since we are not you, and there are only two groups of people. You never stole because you never accepted rules, so therefore we have stolen, and there are only two groups of people; we and you, we are bad because we have stolen from linkshells.

You just called everyone bad by logic. Slander!

OMG HOW CAN YOU TWIST SO MUCH TO BE SO WRONG AND NOT AT ALL WHAT I BELIEVE

[Korpg]

OMG HOW CAN YOU TWIST SO MUCH TO BE SO WRONG AND NOT AT ALL WHAT I BELIEVE

I don't know, I'm just stating things by your rules.

Nobody has slandered you, but you have accused us all of slandering you.

I'm playing by your rules now. That way, you have nothing to complain about.

[katz]

I havent accused everyone and there are still plenty of slanderous statements in this thread.

[Korpg]

I havent accused everyone and there are still plenty of slanderous statements in this thread.

1. As we all said means We = everyone but you. You do not agree with our methods, so you are excluded from the group of we. There are 2 groups now, we and you. You are one who is excluded from we, and we are everyone but you.

Yes, you have accused everyone. Since everyone is every single living being except you, you have accused everyone. Logic dictates it.